Literature DB >> 26815862

Anatomic Reconstruction of Malunited Chopart Joint Injuries.

Stefan Rammelt1,2, Hans Zwipp3, Wolfgang Schneiders3, Jan Heineck3.   

Abstract

Fractures and dislocations at the mid-tarsal (Chopart) joint are frequently overlooked or misinterpreted at first presentation. Inadequate joint reduction and stabilization almost invariably lead to painful malunions or nonunions, residual instability, and deformity. Because of the central position and the essential function of the mid-tarsal joint, malunions lead to a considerable impairment of global foot function and the rapid development of posttraumatic arthritis. While secondary anatomical reconstruction with joint preservation would be desirable in order to restore normal foot function, it is amenable only if no symptomatic arthritis or avascular necrosis is present. Over a course of 6 years, eight patients have been treated with secondary correction, joint realignment, and internal fixation. In four of these cases, nonunions of the tarsal navicular were debrided and bone-grafted; in the remaining cases, a corrective osteotomy at the navicular or cuboid was carried out. At 2 years followup, all but one patient were satisfied with the result. One patient underwent fusion of the talonavicular joint for avascular necrosis and collapse of the navicular. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) improved significantly from 38.8 preoperatively to 80.8 at follow-up. However, the majority of malunited mid-tarsal fracture-dislocations will require corrective fusion of the affected joint(s) with axial realignment because of manifest posttraumatic arthritis at the time of patient presentation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chopart joint; Correction; Dislocation; Fracture; Malunion; Mid-tarsal joint; Nonunion

Year:  2010        PMID: 26815862     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-010-1036-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  22 in total

1.  [The Chopart dislocation. A frequently underestimated injury and its sequelae. A clinical study].

Authors:  A Kotter; J Wieberneit; W Braun; A Rüter
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Hindfoot motion after isolated and combined arthrodeses: measurements in anatomic specimens.

Authors:  N Wülker; C Stukenborg; K M Savory; D Alfke
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  Functional outcome and gait analysis after triple or double arthrodesis.

Authors:  A D Beischer; J W Brodsky; F E Pollo; J Peereboom
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 4.  Total dislocations of the navicular: are they ever isolated injuries?

Authors:  M S Dhillon; O N Nagi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-09

5.  Motion of the hindfoot after simulated arthrodesis.

Authors:  D J Astion; J T Deland; J C Otis; S Kenneally
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  [Arthrodesis of the talonavicular joint].

Authors:  S Rammelt; R K Marti; H Zwipp
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Displaced intra-articular fractures of the tarsal navicular.

Authors:  B J Sangeorzan; S K Benirschke; V Mosca; K A Mayo; S T Hansen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Chondrocyte viability after intra-articular calcaneal fractures in humans.

Authors:  Scott T Ball; Kyle Jadin; R Todd Allen; Alexandra K Schwartz; Robert L Sah; Michael E Brage
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.827

9.  Talonavicular arthrodesis for isolated arthrosis: 9.5-year results and gait analysis.

Authors:  G R Fogel; Y Katoh; J A Rand; E Y Chao
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct

Review 10.  [Posttraumatic deformity correction at the foot].

Authors:  H Zwipp; S Rammelt
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 0.942

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Injuries of the midfoot].

Authors:  S Ochman; J Evers; M J Raschke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Injuries to the Chopart joint complex: a current review.

Authors:  Halah Kutaish; R Stern; L Drittenbass; M Assal
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-17

Review 3.  [Reconstructions after inveterated fractures and dislocations of the foot].

Authors:  H Zwipp
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  [Joint-preserving correction of Chopart joint malunions].

Authors:  S Rammelt; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  [Reconstructions after inveterated fractures and dislocations of the foot].

Authors:  H Zwipp
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.087

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.