Literature DB >> 2592390

Displaced intra-articular fractures of the tarsal navicular.

B J Sangeorzan1, S K Benirschke, V Mosca, K A Mayo, S T Hansen.   

Abstract

Between 1980 and 1987, twenty-one patients who had a displaced fracture of the body of the tarsal navicular were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. A classification system was devised on the basis of the direction of the fracture line, the pattern of disruption of the surrounding joints, and the direction of displacement of the foot. In a Type-1 injury, the fracture line is in the coronal plane and there is no angulation of the fore part of the foot. In a Type-2 fracture, the primary fracture line is dorsal-lateral to plantar-medial, and the major fragment and the fore part of the foot are displaced medially. In a Type-3 injury, there is a comminuted fracture in the sagittal plane of the body of the tarsal navicular, and the fore part of the foot is laterally displaced. Satisfactory reduction, which was defined as restoration of more than 60 per cent of the joint surface in the anteroposterior and lateral planes, was achieved in all Type-1 injuries, 67 per cent of the Type-2 fractures, and 50 per cent of the Type-3 fractures. Radiographic evidence of healing was seen at an average of 8.5 weeks after injury. At an average follow-up of forty-four months (range, twelve to 106 months), a good result was noted in fourteen patients (67 per cent); a fair result, in four (19 per cent); and a poor result, in three (14 per cent). Both the type of fracture and the accuracy of the operative reduction directly correlated with the final clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2592390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bone. Causality, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis].

Authors:  G M Ivanic; T Juranitsch; M S Myerson; H J Trnka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Management of Midfoot Fractures and Dislocations.

Authors:  Atif Ahmed; Edward Westrick
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-12

Review 3.  [Foot injuries in the polytraumatized patient].

Authors:  S Rammelt; A Biewener; R Grass; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  [Joint-preserving correction of Chopart joint malunions].

Authors:  S Rammelt; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  [Chopart dislocation--a simple diagnosis?].

Authors:  R Langenhan; G Kohler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Anatomic Reconstruction of Malunited Chopart Joint Injuries.

Authors:  Stefan Rammelt; Hans Zwipp; Wolfgang Schneiders; Jan Heineck
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  An isolated dorso-medial dislocation of navicular bone: A case report.

Authors:  Varun Kumar Singh; Abhishek Kashyap; Gauresh Vargaonkar; Ramesh Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-12-22

8.  Epidemiology of Navicular Injury at the NFL Combine and Their Impact on an Athlete's Prospective NFL Career.

Authors:  Bryan Vopat; Brendin R Beaulieu-Jones; Gregory Waryasz; Kevin J McHale; George Sanchez; Catherine A Logan; James M Whalen; Christopher W DiGiovanni; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-08-18

9.  Vascular foramina of navicular bone: a morphometric study.

Authors:  Vani Prathapamchandra; Praveena Ravichandran; Jayanthi Shanmugasundaram; Anbalagan Jayaraman; Rajasekar Sivaprakasam Salem
Journal:  Anat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-06-27

10.  The use of locking plates in complex midfoot fractures.

Authors:  E Bayley; N Duncan; A Taylor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.