Literature DB >> 26815231

Influence of implant design on the method of failure for three implants designed for use in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: the dynamic hip screw (DHS), DHS blade and X-BOLT.

F O'Neill1,2, T McGloughlin3, B Lenehan4, F Condon5, J C Coffey6, M Walsh7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The dynamic hip screw (DHS) has been widely adopted as the implant of choice in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. There have been attempts over the years to improve on the DHS lag screw design in order to reduce failure in the form of "cut out". The purpose of this study was to investigate how two new design variations of the DHS, the DHS blade and the X-BOLT, behave within bone, and if these design modifications do indeed improve the fixation achieved and lead to a reduction in failure due to cut out.
METHODS: "Pushout" tests were chosen as the means of investigating the failure modes and patterns for these implants that lead to cut out. These pushout studies were performed in artificial bone substrate in the form of polyurethane foam blocks and in cadaveric femoral heads.
RESULTS: The results demonstrated that each individual implant produces its own specific distinct force-displacement curve or pattern of failure, and that despite the very different implant designs and methods of fixation, all of the implants tested reached very similar peak forces in each of the test materials used.
CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that implant design only influences the pattern of failure, and that the peak forces reached by each implant are determined by the quality of the bone or test material into which they are placed. However, altering the force-displacement curve or pattern of failure may be enough to improve the fixation achieved and to provide an increased resistance to cut out.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DHS; DHS blade; Intertrochanteric fractures; X-BOLT

Year:  2013        PMID: 26815231     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-013-0257-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  10 in total

Review 1.  Unstable trochanteric femoral fractures: extramedullary or intramedullary fixation. Review of literature.

Authors:  I B Schipper; R K Marti; Chr van der Werken
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  The AO dynamic hip screw and the Pugh sliding nail in femoral head fixation.

Authors:  R H Richards; G Evans; J Egan; J R Shearer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-09

3.  Sliding hip screw fixation of trochanteric hip fractures: outcome of 1024 procedures.

Authors:  N Chirodian; Barbara Arch; Martyn J Parker
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  A biomechanical evaluation of the Gamma nail.

Authors:  S F Rosenblum; J D Zuckerman; F J Kummer; B S Tam
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-05

Review 5.  The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures--a review article.

Authors:  E T James; G A Hunter
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation.

Authors:  T R Davis; J L Sher; A Horsman; M Simpson; B B Porter; R G Checketts
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-01

7.  Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques.

Authors:  Arash Aminian; Fan Gao; Wasyl W Fedoriw; Li-Qun Zhang; David M Kalainov; Bradley R Merk
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  [Rotational instability of trochanteric femoral fractures secured with the dynamic hip screw. A radiologic analysis].

Authors:  A Lustenberger; J Bekic; R Ganz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip.

Authors:  M R Baumgaertner; S L Curtin; D M Lindskog; J M Keggi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Compressive properties of commercially available polyurethane foams as mechanical models for osteoporotic human cancellous bone.

Authors:  Purvi S D Patel; Duncan E T Shepherd; David W L Hukins
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Beyond the pedicle screw-a patent review.

Authors:  Esther P de Kater; Aimée Sakes; Erik Edström; Adrian Elmi-Terander; Gerald Kraan; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.721

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.