Literature DB >> 2298790

Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation.

T R Davis1, J L Sher, A Horsman, M Simpson, B B Porter, R G Checketts.   

Abstract

In a prospective study we assessed the causes of mechanical failure in a series of 230 intertrochanteric femoral fractures which had been internally fixed with either a sliding hip screw or a Küntscher Y-nail. The overall rate of mechanical failure was 16.5%; cutting-out of the implant from the femoral head was the cause in three-quarters of the instances. Implants placed posteriorly in the femoral head cut out more often (27%) than those placed centrally (7%). The cut-out rate was also determined by the quality of the fracture reduction, but age, walking ability and bone density (assessed by the Singh grade and metacarpal indices) had no significant influence. We conclude that these fractures should be reduced as accurately as possible and it is imperative that the implant is placed centrally within the femoral head.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2298790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  76 in total

1.  Influence of implant design on the method of failure for three implants designed for use in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: the dynamic hip screw (DHS), DHS blade and X-BOLT.

Authors:  F O'Neill; T McGloughlin; B Lenehan; F Condon; J C Coffey; M Walsh
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 2.  [Biomechanics of implant augmentation].

Authors:  M Windolf
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  A new technique for lag screw placement in the dynamic hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric fractures: decreasing radiation time dramatically.

Authors:  Wei-Chao Sheng; Jia-Zhen Li; Sheng-Hua Chen; Shi-Zhen Zhong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Biomechanical analysis of the dynamic hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  C C Wu; C H Shih
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  A meta-analysis of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw in treating peritrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Ming Liu; Zhiming Yang; Fuxing Pei; Fuguo Huang; Shiqiang Chen; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Treatment of femoral subtrochanteric fractures with proximal lateral femur locking plates.

Authors:  Sun-Jun Hu; Shi-Min Zhang; Guang-Rong Yu
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.513

7.  Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Richard Stern; Anne Lübbeke; Domizio Suva; Hermes Miozzari; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Total hip replacement as primary treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Amarjit Singh Sidhu; Ajay Pal Singh; Arun Pal Singh; Sukhraj Singh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  [Manipulation of the step borer as cause of too shallow boring depth in the femoral neck with the gamma nail system].

Authors:  F Krug; D Baur; H Müller-Daniels; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Comparison of migration behavior between single and dual lag screw implants for intertrochanteric fracture fixation.

Authors:  George K Kouvidis; Mark B Sommers; Peter V Giannoudis; Pavlos G Katonis; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.