Literature DB >> 26812405

Working toward reducing postoperative fracture radiographs: a survey of Canadian surgeons.

Ted Tufescu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When fracture management includes operative fixation with a load-sharing construct in good-quality bone, screening for healing problems or hardware failure with radiographs in the first 6 postoperative weeks may be unnecessary. I sought to determine Canadian orthopedic surgeons' current protocol for early postoperative radiographs of stable, internally fixed fractures as well as their willingness to adopt a simplified protocol.
METHODS: Members of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association were surveyed electronically. Five examples of surgically treated fractures were chosen to represent the spectrum of load-sharing constructs. The survey collected demographic data and inquired about current postoperative radiograph protocols and consideration of a simplified protocol.
RESULTS: Of the 822 emailed invitations to complete the survey, 400 were opened and 243 surveys were completed. Most participants (91%) practised in Canada and managed some trauma (91%), but were not trauma specialists (82%). Surgeon experience was equally distributed. Sixty-six percent of respondents acquire immediate postoperative radiographs after femur and tibia intramedullary nails, and 62% repeat radiographs at 2-week follow-up. Fifty-one percent of respondents acquire immediate postoperative radiographs after forearm, humerus and ankle internal fixation, and 69% repeat radiographs at 2-week follow-up. Of the respondents who currently acquire radiographs, 33% would consider foregoing immediate postoperative radiographs after intramedullary nailing of femur and tibia fractures, while 25% would forego them at 2-week follow-up. Similarly, 58% would consider foregoing radiographs immediately after internal fixation of forearm, humerus and ankle fractures, while 24% would forego them at 2-week follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Many Canadian orthopedic surgeons do not acquire screening postoperative radiographs after stable fracture fixation, and many more are willing to adopt this practice. These findings support investigating the safety and cost-effectiveness of a simplified postoperative radiographic protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26812405      PMCID: PMC4734915          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.005715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  10 in total

1.  Compression-plate fixation in acute diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna.

Authors:  L D Anderson; D Sisk; R E Tooms; W I Park
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Compression-plate fixation of acute fractures of the diaphyses of the radius and ulna.

Authors:  M W Chapman; J E Gordon; A G Zissimos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Healing of closed femoral shaft fractures treated with the AO unreamed femoral nail. A comparative study with the AO reamed femoral nail.

Authors:  P A Reynders; P L Broos
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Early weight-bearing after statically locked reamed intramedullary nailing of comminuted femoral fractures: is it a safe procedure?

Authors:  M Arazi; T C Oğün; M N Oktar; R Memik; A Kutlu
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2001-04

5.  Loads acting in an intramedullary nail during fracture healing in the human femur.

Authors:  E Schneider; M C Michel; M Genge; K Zuber; R Ganz; S M Perren
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  A method of measuring the change in compression applied to living cortical bone.

Authors:  S M Perren; A Huggler; M Russenberger; F Straumann; M E Müller; M Allgöwer
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1969

7.  Immediate weight-bearing after treatment of a comminuted fracture of the femoral shaft with a statically locked intramedullary nail.

Authors:  R J Brumback; T R Toal; M S Murphy-Zane; V P Novak; S M Belkoff
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Plate osteosynthesis of diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna.

Authors:  R Hertel; M Pisan; S Lambert; F T Ballmer
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 9.  Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation.

Authors:  S M Perren
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Femoral shaft fractures treated by intramedullary nailing. A follow-up study focusing on problems related to the method.

Authors:  M Bråten; T Terjesen; I Rossvoll
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.586

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Is there a need for standardized postoperative radiographs after operative treatment of wrist or ankle fractures?

Authors:  Florian Oehme; Björn Christian Link; Herman Frima; Tim Schepers; Steven J Rhemrev; Reto Babst; Frank J P Beeres
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  The cost of screening radiographs after stable fracture fixation.

Authors:  Ted Tufescu
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Are Routine Radiographs Needed the Day After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Surgery for Distal Radius and Ankle Fractures: Study Protocol for a Prospective, Open Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Florian Oehme; Annika Rühle; Julia Mühlhäusser; Lana Fourie; Björn-Christian Link; Reto Babst; Frank Jp Beeres
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-08-16

4.  Routine early post-operative X-ray following internal fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures is unjustified: a quality improvement study.

Authors:  David Segal; Ezequiel Palmanovich; Ali Faour; Elad Marom; Viktor Feldman; Eyal Yaacobi; Omer Slevin; Benjamin Kish; Yaron S Brin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.