Literature DB >> 10775694

Healing of closed femoral shaft fractures treated with the AO unreamed femoral nail. A comparative study with the AO reamed femoral nail.

P A Reynders1, P L Broos.   

Abstract

Out of a hundred and seven closed femoral fractures, fifty-three were treated with the unreamed femoral nail and fifty-four with the reamed femoral nail. There were four delayed unions in the Unreamed Femoral Nail group (UFN) and three in the Reamed Femoral Nail group (RFN). There were no cases of infection or malunion. Implant failure was the cause of implant conversion in one patient of the UFN group. Healing time of the femoral fractures was 19.2 weeks in the UFN group and 19.6 weeks in the RFN group. Due to the significant decrease in operating time with the UFN (70 min) in comparison with the RFN (125 min) and the possible risk of posttraumatic pulmonary oedema (ARDS) with reaming techniques, the authors recommend the UFN for the treatment of acute closed femoral shaft fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10775694     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(00)00005-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  9 in total

1.  Healing, nonunion, and re-operation after internal fixation of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Riikka E Koso; Cristina Terhoeve; R Grant Steen; Robert Zura
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of open and closed tibial fractures: a subgroup analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Deting Xue; Qiang Zheng; Hang Li; Shengjun Qian; Bo Zhang; Zhijun Pan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Working toward reducing postoperative fracture radiographs: a survey of Canadian surgeons.

Authors:  Ted Tufescu
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  The cost of screening radiographs after stable fracture fixation.

Authors:  Ted Tufescu
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Percutaneous antegrade nailing with reductor-T tape pin is effective and well tolerated in patients with ipsilateral multisegmental femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jianning Liu; Zhiyong Li; Guohui Xu; Rongling Wei; Xu Li; Xiangbei Qi
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Mechanical advantages of a truss-structure-based fracture fixation system--a novel fracture fixation device "PinFix".

Authors:  Tetsuya Arai; Michiro Yamamoto; Katsuyuki Iwatsuki; Tadahiro Natsume; Takaaki Shinohara; Masahiro Tatebe; Shigeru Kurimoto; Hideyuki Ota; Shuichi Kato; Hitoshi Hirata
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.131

7.  Clinical outcome of ream versus unream intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Farshid Bagheri; Seyed Reza Sharifi; Navid Reza Mirzadeh; Alireza Hootkani; Mohamad Hosein Ebrahimzadeh; Hami Ashraf
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 0.611

8.  Surgical factors contributing to nonunion in femoral shaft fracture following intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Yong-Gang Ma; Ge-Liang Hu; Wei Hu; Fan Liang
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2016-04-01

9.  Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femoral fractures: A meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A-Bing Li; Wei-Jiang Zhang; Wei-Jun Guo; Xin-Hua Wang; Hai-Ming Jin; You-Ming Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.