| Literature DB >> 26811762 |
Fushi Ke1, Shijun You2, Weiyi He1, Tiansheng Liu1, Liette Vasseur3, Carl J Douglas2, Minsheng You1.
Abstract
Movement of individuals through events, such as storms or crop transportation, may affect survival and distribution of insect pests, as well as population genetic structure at a regional scale. Understanding what factors contribute to gene flow in pest populations remains very important for sustainable pest management. The diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) is an insect pest well known for its capacity of moving over short to long distances. Here, we used newly isolated microsatellite markers to analyze the genetic structure of nine populations across the Taiwan Strait of China (Taiwan and Fujian). A total of 12,152 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were initially identified from the P. xylostella transcriptome (~94 Mb), with an average of 129 SSRs per Mb. Nine SSRs were validated to be polymorphic markers, and eight were used for this population genetic study. Our results showed that the P. xylostella populations could be divided into distinct two clusters, which is likely due to the year-round airflows in this region. A pattern of isolation by distance among the local populations within Fujian was found, and may be related to vegetable transportation. Considering the complexity of the P. xylostella population genetic structure from local and regional to global levels, we propose that developing ecologically sound strategies for managing this pest will require knowledge of the link between behavioral and population ecology and its genetic structure.Entities:
Keywords: Air currents; diamondback moth; gene flow; genetic variation; simple sequence repeats
Year: 2015 PMID: 26811762 PMCID: PMC4717340 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1850
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Map showing geographic location of the Taiwan Strait (left) and sampling locations of Plutella xylostella used for this study. The inset in bottom left corner shows the life cycle of P. xylostella. (Photos by Tiansheng Liu).
Sampling locations, numbers, and collection date of the Plutella xylostella (Px) specimens from Fujian and Taiwan, in southeast of China
| Region | Sampling location | Geographic coordinates | Px number | Collection date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Fujian | Wuyishan | 27.70°N, 118.00°E | 16 | 2012.7 |
| Ningde | 27.13°N, 119.29°E | 35 | 2012.10 | |
| Fuzhou | 26.06°N, 119.21°E | 42 | 2011.8 | |
| Southern Fujian | Putian | 25.52°N, 118.80°E | 39 | 2013.10 |
| Quanzhou | 24.92°N, 118.52°E | 37 | 2013.12 | |
| Xiamen | 24.68°N, 118.14°E | 32 | 2014.1 | |
| Zhangzhou | 24.04°N, 117.82°E | 33 | 2013.12 | |
| Taiwan | Xinzhu | 24.91°N, 121.00°E | 22 | 2013.4 |
| Yunlin | 23.72°N, 120.42°E | 32 | 2013.4 |
Pairwise differentiation (F ST) among the Plutella xylostella populations sampled from different locations across the Taiwan Strait based on uncorrected (a) and corrected (b) allele frequencies
| Sampled locations | Putian | Zhangzhou | Fuzhou | Ningde | Quanzhou | Wuyishan | Xiamen | Xinzhu |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) Pairwise differentiation ( | ||||||||
| Zhangzhou | −0.007 | |||||||
| Fuzhou |
|
| ||||||
| Ningde |
|
|
| |||||
| Quanzhou |
| 0.011 |
|
| ||||
| Wuyishan |
|
| −0.003 |
|
| |||
| Xiamen |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Xinzhu | −0.012 | −0.005 |
|
| 0.011 | 0.020 |
| |
| Yunlin | −0.002 | 0.004 |
|
|
| 0.016 |
| −0.003 |
| (b) Pairwise differentiation ( | ||||||||
| Zhangzhou | −0.007 | |||||||
| Fuzhou |
|
| ||||||
| Ningde |
|
|
| |||||
| Quanzhou | 0.006 | 0.004 |
|
| ||||
| Wuyishan |
|
| −0.003 |
|
| |||
| Xiamen |
| 0.006 |
|
|
|
| ||
| Xinzhu | −0.012 | −0.004 |
|
| 0.005 | 0.025 |
| |
| Yunlin | −0.001 | 0.005 |
|
| 0.001 | 0.018 |
| −0.002 |
Numbers in bold italics indicate significant values at P < 0.001.
Characteristics of nine polymorphic SSRs developed in Plutella xylostella
| Polymorphic SSR | GenBank Accession No. | Motif | Primers (5′‐3′) |
| Observed size (bp) | Unigene /Position in the transcripts/Annotation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ATC |
F: GTTCGACATCGGCAGAATTT | 15 | 184–238 | Unigene34680_All/UTR |
|
|
| CCG |
F: TTTAGTGACGAGATGAGCGG | 12 | 135–177 | Unigene99000_All/CDS/Px013469 (unknown function) |
|
|
| TGG |
F: GTGCGTCAAATGTCTTGGTG | 9 | 150–174 | Unigene26450_All/UTR |
|
|
| AAC |
F: CAACAAACACAACGGCAATC | 8 | 221–290 | Unigene48948_All/CDS/Transcriptional activator cubitus interruptus |
|
|
| CCA |
F: TGGCTCCACTCCACAACATA | 6 | 219–234 | Unigene145643_All/ CDS/Microtubule‐associated protein futsch |
|
|
| CCA |
F: TACAACACCCAACATGCACC | 8 | 104–167 | Unigene56663_All/ CDS/Microtubule‐associated protein futsch |
|
|
| CGC |
F: TGCTTATAGCCTCGTAGCCG | 13 | 138–177 | Unigene113679_All/UTR |
|
|
| CTA |
F: CCTCATTTGTCCCATCATCC | 10 | 131–182 | Unigene169897_All/UTR |
|
|
| AAT |
F: TCGCCACGATATGTTCGATA | 7 | 153–171 | Unigene82431_All/UTR |
The annotation information is from DBM‐DB (Tang et al. 2014); UTR means untranslated regions; CDS denotes coding sequence. F and R indicate forward and reverse.
Analysis for the selective neutrality of the identified polymorphic SSR loci based on Ewens–Watterson Test using POPGENE
| Locus |
| OF | Mean | SE |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 576 | 0.32 | 0.37 | 0.02 | 0.19 | 0.75 |
|
| 576 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.82 |
|
| 576 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.03 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
|
| 576 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.61 |
|
| 576 | 0.44 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.51 |
|
| 576 | 0.59 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 0.79 |
|
| 576 | 0.64 | 0.48 | 0.03 | 0.23 | 0.87 |
|
| 576 | 0.59 | 0.40 | 0.02 | 0.20 | 0.75 |
|
| 576 | 0.23 | 0.32 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.67 |
These statistics were calculated using 1000 simulated samples.
The total number of alleles.
Observed sum of the square of allelic frequency.
Standard error of the mean.
Lower 95% confidence limit.
Upper 95% confidence limit.
Genetic diversity at eight microsatellite loci for the sampled Plutella xylostella populations across the Taiwan Strait
| Loci | Wuyishan | Ningde | Fuzhou | Putian | Quanzhou | Xiamen | Zhangzhou | Xinzhu | Yunlin | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.88 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.29 |
| 0.38 |
| 0.27 |
| 0.38 |
| 0.45 |
| 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.74 |
|
| 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.60 | 0.36 |
| 0.44 | 0.52 | 0.27 |
| 0.44 | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.41 | 0.46 |
|
| 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.51 |
| 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.55 |
| 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.72 |
|
| 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.41 |
| 0.57 |
| 0.44 |
| 0.42 |
| 0.36 |
| 0.56 | 0.60 |
|
| 0.31 | 0.42 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.26 |
| 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.28 |
| 0.39 | 0.44 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.31 | 0.38 |
|
| 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.22 |
| 0.31 |
| 0.27 | 0.36 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.25 |
|
|
| 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
|
| 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.64 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.53 |
| 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.77 |
| Mean | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.43 |
| 0.41 |
| 0.44 |
| 0.43 |
| 0.45 |
| 0.46 |
| 0.50 |
|
| Total alleles | 28 | 40 | 52 | 44 | 46 | 46 | 46 | 40 | 45 | |||||||||
| Allelic richness | 3.50 | 4.33 | 5.05 | 4.91 | 5.20 | 5.25 | 5.07 | 4.86 | 5.12 | |||||||||
| Specific alleles | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
H o denotes observed heterozygosity; H e refers to expected heterozygosity; H e in bold italic indicates a significant positive Fis value (heterozygote deficiency) with P < 0.05 based on 1440 randomizations.
Figure 2Population structure plot showing two distinct clusters of the Plutella xylostella populations sampled from nine different locations across the Taiwan Strait. Individuals are indicated by vertical bars with different colors to denote the membership of location‐associated populations.
Figure 3Neighbor‐joining tree based on 1000 bootstraps (A) and Principal Coordinates Analysis (B) of the Plutella xylostella populations sampled from different locations in Fujian and Taiwan. Two groups (K = 2) are intuitively clustered with colored triangles and diamonds to indicate the membership of location‐associated populations.
Figure 4Correlation analysis between the geographic distance (log) and genetic distance ( /(1−)) among the Plutella xylostella populations sampled from different locations in Fujian province (R 2 = 0.271; P = 0.028).
Mutation‐scaled population sizes (θ) and migration rates (M) among the Plutella xylostella populations sampled from Fuzhou, Putian, and Yunlin, estimated with Migrate
| Parameter | Location | Percentiles | Maximal posterior value | Median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From | To | 2.5% | 97.5% | |||
|
| Putian | 0.094 | 0.100 | 0.099 | 0.098 | |
|
| Fuzhou | 0.095 | 0.100 | 0.098 | 0.098 | |
|
| Yunlin | 0.094 | 0.100 | 0.098 | 0.098 | |
|
| Fuzhou | Putian | 34.000 | 82.667 | 59.000 | 59.667 |
|
| Yunlin | Putian | 30.000 | 76.667 | 53.667 | 54.333 |
|
| Putian | Fuzhou | 27.333 | 70.667 | 49.667 | 50.333 |
|
| Yunlin | Fuzhou | 18.667 | 62.667 | 41.000 | 41.667 |
|
| Putian | Yunlin | 49.333 | 100.667 | 75.000 | 75.667 |
|
| Fuzhou | Yunlin | 24.000 | 80.667 | 51.000 | 52.333 |