Kevin A Schafer1, Scott Tucker2, Timothy Griffith3, Saad Sheikh2, Thomas L Wickiewicz3, Danyal H Nawabi3, Carl W Imhauser2, Andrew D Pearle3. 1. Department of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA schafeke@rwjms.rutgers.edu. 2. Department of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA. 3. Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pivot-shift injury commonly results in combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)/medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury, yet the contribution of the components of the MCL complex to restraining multiplanar rotatory loads forming critical subcomponents of the pivot shift is not well understood. PURPOSE: To quantify the role of the MCL complex in restraining multiplanar rotatory loads. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A robotic manipulator was used to apply combined valgus and internal rotation torques in a simplified model of the pivot-shift examination in 12 cadaveric knees (49 ± 11 years). Tibiofemoral kinematics were recorded with the ACL intact. Loads borne by the superficial MCL (sMCL), posterior oblique ligament (POL), deep MCL (dMCL), and ACL were determined via the principle of superposition. RESULTS: The POL bore about 50% of the load carried by the ACL in response to the combined torques at 5° and 15° of flexion. The POL bore load during the internal rotation component of the combined torques, while the sMCL carried load during the valgus and internal rotation phases of the simulated pivot. Load in the dMCL was always <10% of the ACL in response to combined valgus and internal rotation torques. CONCLUSION: The POL provides complementary load bearing to the ACL near extension in response to combined torques, which capture key components of the pivot-shift examination. The sMCL resists the valgus component of the maneuver alone, a loading pattern unique from those of the POL and ACL. The dMCL is not loaded during clinical tests of rotational knee stability in the ACL-competent knee. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both the sMCL and POL work together with the ACL to resist combined moments, which form key components of the pivot-shift examination.
BACKGROUND: Pivot-shift injury commonly results in combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)/medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury, yet the contribution of the components of the MCL complex to restraining multiplanar rotatory loads forming critical subcomponents of the pivot shift is not well understood. PURPOSE: To quantify the role of the MCL complex in restraining multiplanar rotatory loads. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A robotic manipulator was used to apply combined valgus and internal rotation torques in a simplified model of the pivot-shift examination in 12 cadaveric knees (49 ± 11 years). Tibiofemoral kinematics were recorded with the ACL intact. Loads borne by the superficial MCL (sMCL), posterior oblique ligament (POL), deep MCL (dMCL), and ACL were determined via the principle of superposition. RESULTS: The POL bore about 50% of the load carried by the ACL in response to the combined torques at 5° and 15° of flexion. The POL bore load during the internal rotation component of the combined torques, while the sMCL carried load during the valgus and internal rotation phases of the simulated pivot. Load in the dMCL was always <10% of the ACL in response to combined valgus and internal rotation torques. CONCLUSION: The POL provides complementary load bearing to the ACL near extension in response to combined torques, which capture key components of the pivot-shift examination. The sMCL resists the valgus component of the maneuver alone, a loading pattern unique from those of the POL and ACL. The dMCL is not loaded during clinical tests of rotational knee stability in the ACL-competent knee. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both the sMCL and POL work together with the ACL to resist combined moments, which form key components of the pivot-shift examination.
Authors: Ahmet Erdemir; Thor F Besier; Jason P Halloran; Carl W Imhauser; Peter J Laz; Tina M Morrison; Kevin B Shelburne Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Guido Wierer; Danko Milinkovic; James R Robinson; Michael J Raschke; Andreas Weiler; Christian Fink; Mirco Herbort; Christoph Kittl Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2020-04-10 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Patricia M Lutz; Matthias J Feucht; Judith Wechselberger; Michael Rasper; Wolf Petersen; Klaus Wörtler; Andreas B Imhoff; Andrea Achtnich Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 4.342