INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Female stress urinary incontinence is highly prevalent, and synthetic midurethral sling placement is the most common type of anti-incontinence surgery performed in the USA. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with surgery used to treated vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement for stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: We identified women who underwent anti-incontinence procedures from January 2002 through December 2012. Patients with vaginal mesh exposure undergoing surgical repair after midurethral sling placement were compared with a control group without mesh exposure in a 1:3 ratio. Patients with ObTape sling placement (Mentor Corporation) were excluded. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between clinical risk factors and vaginal mesh exposure. RESULTS: Overall, 2,123 patients underwent primary sling placement, with 27 (1.3 %) having vaginal mesh exposure necessitating surgical repair. Patients with mesh exposure were more likely to have undergone previous bariatric surgery (P = 0.008), hemoglobin <13 g/dL (P = 0.006), premenopausal status (P = 0.008), age <50 years (P = 0.001), and the retropubic approach to sling placement (P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis identified these risk factors: previous bariatric surgery (odds ratio [OR], 7.0; 95 % CI, 1.1-61.4), retropubic approach (OR, 5.7; 95 % CI, 1.1-107.0), preoperative hemoglobin <13 g/dL (OR, 2.8; 95 % CI, 1.1-7.5), and premenopausal status (OR, 2.6; 95 % CI, 1.0-7.3). Among postmenopausal patients, those with mesh exposure were significantly more likely to receive preoperative estrogen therapy (OR, 12.4; 95 % CI, 2.7-57.8). CONCLUSIONS: Previous bariatric surgery, retropubic approach, premenopausal status, and lower preoperative hemoglobin were associated with a significantly increased risk of surgery for vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement. Recognizing these factors can improve preoperative patient counseling.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Female stress urinary incontinence is highly prevalent, and synthetic midurethral sling placement is the most common type of anti-incontinence surgery performed in the USA. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with surgery used to treated vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement for stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: We identified women who underwent anti-incontinence procedures from January 2002 through December 2012. Patients with vaginal mesh exposure undergoing surgical repair after midurethral sling placement were compared with a control group without mesh exposure in a 1:3 ratio. Patients with ObTape sling placement (Mentor Corporation) were excluded. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between clinical risk factors and vaginal mesh exposure. RESULTS: Overall, 2,123 patients underwent primary sling placement, with 27 (1.3 %) having vaginal mesh exposure necessitating surgical repair. Patients with mesh exposure were more likely to have undergone previous bariatric surgery (P = 0.008), hemoglobin <13 g/dL (P = 0.006), premenopausal status (P = 0.008), age <50 years (P = 0.001), and the retropubic approach to sling placement (P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis identified these risk factors: previous bariatric surgery (odds ratio [OR], 7.0; 95 % CI, 1.1-61.4), retropubic approach (OR, 5.7; 95 % CI, 1.1-107.0), preoperative hemoglobin <13 g/dL (OR, 2.8; 95 % CI, 1.1-7.5), and premenopausal status (OR, 2.6; 95 % CI, 1.0-7.3). Among postmenopausal patients, those with mesh exposure were significantly more likely to receive preoperative estrogen therapy (OR, 12.4; 95 % CI, 2.7-57.8). CONCLUSIONS: Previous bariatric surgery, retropubic approach, premenopausal status, and lower preoperative hemoglobin were associated with a significantly increased risk of surgery for vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement. Recognizing these factors can improve preoperative patient counseling.
Authors: Joye K Lowman; Patrick J Woodman; Patrick A Nosti; Richard C Bump; Colin L Terry; Douglass S Hale Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-04-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Larry T Sirls; Gregory P McLennan; Kim A Killinger; Judith A Boura; Melissa Fischer; Pradeep Nagaraju; Kenneth Peters Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2013 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: Jennifer M Wu; Catherine A Matthews; Mitchell M Conover; Virginia Pate; Michele Jonsson Funk Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Jennifer M Wu; Camille P Vaughan; Patricia S Goode; David T Redden; Kathryn L Burgio; Holly E Richter; Alayne D Markland Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Alkan Çubuk; Akif Erbin; Metin Savun; Ali Ayrancı; Burak Üçpınar; Fatih Yanaral; Ömer Sarılar; Şeref Basal; Mehmet Fatih Akbulut Journal: Turk J Urol Date: 2018-12-21
Authors: Eoin MacCraith; Eoghan M Cunnane; Michael Joyce; James C Forde; Fergal J O'Brien; Niall F Davis Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Jacek Kociszewski; Wojciech Majkusiak; Andrzej Pomian; Paweł Tomasik; Edyta Horosz; Andrzej Kuszka; Ewa Barcz Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2016-11-23 Impact factor: 3.411