Literature DB >> 23797518

Exploring predictors of mesh exposure after vaginal prolapse repair.

Larry T Sirls1, Gregory P McLennan, Kim A Killinger, Judith A Boura, Melissa Fischer, Pradeep Nagaraju, Kenneth Peters.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical, demographic, and surgical factors that may be associated with mesh exposure after vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
METHODS: Records of women who underwent POP repair with Elevate or Prolift were retrospectively reviewed. Body mass index (BMI), prolapse grade, smoking history, diabetes, steroid and estrogen use, parity, compartment repaired, concurrent hysterectomy, operative time, postoperative pain, change in hemoglobin (ΔHgb) and other characteristics were evaluated for associations with mesh exposure.Categorical variables were examined using Pearson χ test where appropriate, or the Fisher exact test was used. The continuous variables were examined using Wilcoxon rank tests. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was completed to examine predictors of mesh exposure. All analyses used SAS for Windows version 9.2 (Cary, NC).
RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-five women underwent repair from 2006 to 2011. Vaginal mesh exposure was identified in 27 (8.1%) of the 335 women. Patients with exposure had longer median follow-up than the group with no exposure (357 vs 145 days; P = 0.0003). The median time to exposure was 96 days (15-1129 days). Mesh exposure was associated with lower BMI (25.2 ± 2.5 vs 27.4 ± 5.1; P = 0.020) and greater ΔHgb (-3.7 ± 1.7 mg/dL vs -2.5 ±1.3; P = 0.0011). Change in hemoglobin decreased over time (P = 0.0005). Exposure rates also decreased over time (17% in 2005 to 12% in 2006, then 5%-8% in 2006-2011) but were not statistically significant (P = 0.49).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, vaginal mesh exposure was only associated with ΔHgb and lower BMI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23797518     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e318298b381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  9 in total

Review 1.  Pelvic Prolapse Repair in the Era of Mesh.

Authors:  Natalie Gaines; Priyanka Gupta; Larry T Sirls
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Vaginal native tissue repair versus transvaginal mesh repair for apical prolapse: how utilizing different methods of analysis affects the estimated trade-off between reoperation for mesh exposure/erosion and reoperation for recurrent prolapse.

Authors:  Alexis A Dieter; Marcella G Willis-Gray; Alison C Weidner; Anthony G Visco; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Retrospective comparison between the Prolift and Elevate anterior vaginal mesh procedures: 18-month clinical outcome.

Authors:  Artur Rogowski; Przemyslaw Bienkowski; Dariusz Tarwacki; Monika Szafarowska; Jerzy Samochowiec; Halina Sienkiewicz-Jarosz; Malgorzata Jerzak; Wlodzimierz Baranowski
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Secondary surgery after vaginal prolapse repair with mesh is more common for stress incontinence and voiding dysfunction than for mesh problems or prolapse recurrence.

Authors:  Jamie M Bartley; Larry T Sirls; Kim A Killinger; Judith A Boura
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Vaginal mesh for prolapse: a long-term prospective study of 218 mesh kits from a single centre.

Authors:  Debjyoti Karmakar; Lynsey Hayward; Jackie Smalldridge; Sylvia Lin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Host-biomaterial interactions in mesh complications after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Roxanna E Abhari; Matthew L Izett-Kay; Hayley L Morris; Rufus Cartwright; Sarah J B Snelling
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Pain Scores and Exposure Rates after Polypropylene Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Jana D Illston; Jeffrey B Garris; Holly E Richter; Thomas L Wheeler
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.954

8.  Preoperative vaginal estrogen and midurethral sling exposure: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lauren A Cadish; Elizabeth H West; Jessica Sisto; Teresa Longoria; Judith D Bebchuk; Emily L Whitcomb
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Predictors of vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement: a case-control study.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; Sherif A El-Nashar; Daniel A Carranza Leon; Emanuel C Trabuco
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.894

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.