Antti Silvoniemi1,2, Mueez U Din3, Sami Suilamo4,5, Tony Shepherd3,4, Heikki Minn3,4. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Turku University Hospital, P.O. BOX 52, 20521, Turku, Finland. anmisi@utu.fi. 2. Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, P.O. BOX 52, 20521, Turku, Finland. anmisi@utu.fi. 3. Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, P.O. BOX 52, 20521, Turku, Finland. 4. Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, P.O. BOX 52, 20521, Turku, Finland. 5. Department of Medical Physics, Turku University Hospital, P.O. BOX 52, 20521, Turku, Finland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Delineation of gross tumour volume in 3D is a critical step in the radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Static [18F]-FDG PET/CT imaging has been suggested as a method to improve the reproducibility of tumour delineation, but it suffers from low specificity. We undertook this pilot study in which dynamic features in time-activity curves (TACs) of [18F]-FDG PET/CT images were applied to help the discrimination of tumour from inflammation and adjacent normal tissue. METHODS: Five patients with OPC underwent dynamic [18F]-FDG PET/CT imaging in treatment position. Voxel-by-voxel analysis was performed to evaluate seven dynamic features developed with the knowledge of differences in glucose metabolism in different tissue types and visual inspection of TACs. The Gaussian mixture model and K-means algorithms were used to evaluate the performance of the dynamic features in discriminating tumour voxels compared to the performance of standardized uptake values obtained from static imaging. RESULTS: Some dynamic features showed a trend towards discrimination of different metabolic areas but lack of consistency means that clinical application is not recommended based on these results alone. CONCLUSIONS: Impact of inflammatory tissue remains a problem for volume delineation in RT of OPC, but a simple dynamic imaging protocol proved practicable and enabled simple data analysis techniques that show promise for complementing the information in static uptake values.
PURPOSE: Delineation of gross tumour volume in 3D is a critical step in the radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Static [18F]-FDG PET/CT imaging has been suggested as a method to improve the reproducibility of tumour delineation, but it suffers from low specificity. We undertook this pilot study in which dynamic features in time-activity curves (TACs) of [18F]-FDG PET/CT images were applied to help the discrimination of tumour from inflammation and adjacent normal tissue. METHODS: Five patients with OPC underwent dynamic [18F]-FDG PET/CT imaging in treatment position. Voxel-by-voxel analysis was performed to evaluate seven dynamic features developed with the knowledge of differences in glucose metabolism in different tissue types and visual inspection of TACs. The Gaussian mixture model and K-means algorithms were used to evaluate the performance of the dynamic features in discriminating tumour voxels compared to the performance of standardized uptake values obtained from static imaging. RESULTS: Some dynamic features showed a trend towards discrimination of different metabolic areas but lack of consistency means that clinical application is not recommended based on these results alone. CONCLUSIONS: Impact of inflammatory tissue remains a problem for volume delineation in RT of OPC, but a simple dynamic imaging protocol proved practicable and enabled simple data analysis techniques that show promise for complementing the information in static uptake values.
Authors: Zhen Ma; João Manuel R S Tavares; Renato Natal Jorge; T Mascarenhas Journal: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin Date: 2010 Impact factor: 1.763
Authors: Mark Muzi; Finbarr O'Sullivan; David A Mankoff; Robert K Doot; Larry A Pierce; Brenda F Kurland; Hannah M Linden; Paul E Kinahan Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-07-21 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Eric R Carlson; Josh Schaefferkoetter; David Townsend; J Michael McCoy; Paul D Campbell; Misty Long Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 1.895
Authors: Anil K Chaturvedi; Eric A Engels; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Brenda Y Hernandez; Weihong Xiao; Esther Kim; Bo Jiang; Marc T Goodman; Maria Sibug-Saber; Wendy Cozen; Lihua Liu; Charles F Lynch; Nicolas Wentzensen; Richard C Jordan; Sean Altekruse; William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Maura L Gillison Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Per Attner; Juan Du; Anders Näsman; Lalle Hammarstedt; Torbjörn Ramqvist; Johan Lindholm; Linda Marklund; Tina Dalianis; Eva Munck-Wikland Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 7.396