Literature DB >> 26809671

Management of Complications and Outcomes After Revisional Bariatric Surgery: 3-Year Experience at a Bariatric Center of Excellence.

Mohamed Abdelgawad1,2, Francesco De Angelis1, Angelo Iossa1, Mario Rizzello1, Giuseppe Cavallaro1, Gianfranco Silecchia3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) is increasingly common. A tailored decision-making process is advocated. In this retrospective study, we reviewed the RBS experience of a single center, analyzing perioperative complications to provide insight into management options and midterm outcomes.
METHODS: Records from November 2011 to March 2015 were reviewed from prospectively maintained database. Six hundred eighteen patients underwent laparoscopic bariatric procedures; of these, 81 (13.1 %) underwent RBS. Patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months (n = 77) were evaluated. Fifty-nine underwent revised laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and 18 underwent revised Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Indications for RBS were inadequate weight loss or weight regain in 42 cases (54.5 %) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), procedure-related complications, or technical failure in 35 cases (45.5 %).
RESULTS: There were no deaths or conversions to open surgery. After a mean follow-up of 22 months, body mass index (BMI) decreased from 40.9 ± 6.7 to 31.9 ± 4.8 kg/m(2), mean % excess weight loss (%EWL) was 58 ± 24.3 %, and 55.3 % of patients had resolution of comorbidities. Eight major complications (10.4 %) occurred: five leaks and three intra-abdominal hematomas. Non-surgical management succeeded in 50 % of complications.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that RBS is challenging; a complication rate of 10 % is expected. Major surgery can be avoided when devoted endoscopists and radiologists are available. Intensive follow-up after complications allows early diagnosis and treatment of unfavorable sequelae. RBS induced a mean %EWL of 58 % at 2 years and resolution of comorbidities in 50 % of cases. However, the durability of these effects remains questionable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Fistula; Laparoscopic surgery; Leak; Morbid obesity; Revisional bariatric surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26809671     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-016-2071-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  21 in total

1.  Laparoscopic revisional surgery after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Mario P Morales; Andrew A Wheeler; Archana Ramaswamy; J Stephen Scott; Roger A de la Torre
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.734

2.  Worthy or not? Six-year experience of revisional bariatric surgery from an Asian center of excellence.

Authors:  Anirudh Vij; Kirubakaran Malapan; Ching-Chung Tsai; Kuo-Chung Hung; Po-Chi Chang; Chih-Kun Huang
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.734

3.  Revisional vs. primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass--a case-matched analysis: less weight loss in revisions.

Authors:  Urs Zingg; Alexander McQuinn; Dennis DiValentino; Steven Kinsey-Trotman; Philip Game; David Watson
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  A two-decade spectrum of revisional bariatric surgery at a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Nesset; Michael L Kendrick; Scott G Houghton; Jane L Mai; Geoffrey B Thompson; Florencia G Que; Kristine M Thomsen; Dirk R Larson; Michael G Sarr
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.734

5.  Simple versus reinforced cruroplasty in patients submitted to concomitant laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective evaluation in a bariatric center of excellence.

Authors:  Sara Ruscio; Mohamed Abdelgawad; Danilo Badiali; Olga Iorio; Mario Rizzello; Giuseppe Cavallaro; Carola Severi; Gianfranco Silecchia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Revisional bariatric surgery: who, what, where, and when?

Authors:  John F Radtka; Frances J Puleo; Li Wang; Robert N Cooney
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 4.734

7.  High revision rates after laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty.

Authors:  Richard Marsk; Eduard Jonas; Helena Gartzios; Dag Stockeld; Lars Granström; Jacob Freedman
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 4.734

Review 8.  Gastric banding: conversion to sleeve, bypass, or DS.

Authors:  Michel Gagner; Andrew A Gumbs
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Weight loss outcome of revisional bariatric operations varies according to the primary procedure.

Authors:  Robert E Brolin; Ronald P Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revision procedure after restrictive bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Hugo Sanchez; Alfredo Cabrera; Karina Cabrera; Carlos Zerrweck; Maureen Mosti; Mauricio Sierra; Guillermo Dominguez; Miguel F Herrera
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 4.129

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: overview of pathogenesis and risk factors.

Authors:  Angelo Iossa; Mohamed Abdelgawad; Brad Michael Watkins; Gianfranco Silecchia
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Role of Robotic Surgery in Complex Revisional Bariatric Procedures.

Authors:  Yilon Lima Cheng; Enrique F Elli
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Perioperative hemorrhagic complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: four-year experience of a bariatric center of excellence.

Authors:  Francesco De Angelis; Mohamed Abdelgawad; Mario Rizzello; Consalvo Mattia; Gianfranco Silecchia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Long-term Metabolic Effects of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Danila Capoccia; Federica Coccia; Gloria Guarisco; Moira Testa; Roberta Rendina; Francesca Abbatini; Gianfranco Silecchia; Frida Leonetti
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Revisional Bariatric Surgery for Weight Regain and Refractory Complications in a Single MBSAQIP Accredited Center: What Are We Dealing with?

Authors:  Jeffrey Qiu; Peter W Lundberg; T Javier Birriel; Leonardo Claros; Jill Stoltzfus; Maher El Chaar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  Reoperative Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review of the Reasons for Surgery, Medical and Weight Loss Outcomes, Relevant Behavioral Factors.

Authors:  Ana Pinto-Bastos; Eva M Conceição; Paulo P P Machado
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Activation of the MAC1-ERK1/2-NOX2 Pathway Is Required for LPS-Induced Sustaining Reactive Microgliosis, Chronic Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Shih-Heng Chen; Shuangyu Han; Chih-Fen Hu; Ran Zhou; Yun Gao; Dezhen Tu; Huiming Gao; Jing Feng; Yubao Wang; Ru-Band Lu; Jau-Shyong Hong
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

8.  Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery in a Complex Patient Population.

Authors:  Katherine D Gray; Maureen D Moore; Adham Elmously; Omar Bellorin; Rasa Zarnegar; Gregory Dakin; Alfons Pomp; Cheguevara Afaneh
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Outcomes of primary sleeve gastrectomy versus conversion sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Jong Seob Park; Sang-Moon Han
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 1.859

Review 10.  The advantages and disadvantages of sleeve gastrectomy; clinical laboratory to bedside review.

Authors:  Milad Kheirvari; Nikta Dadkhah Nikroo; Habib Jaafarinejad; Marziye Farsimadan; Sahar Eshghjoo; Sara Hosseini; Taha Anbara
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-02-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.