Literature DB >> 26428202

Simple versus reinforced cruroplasty in patients submitted to concomitant laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective evaluation in a bariatric center of excellence.

Sara Ruscio1, Mohamed Abdelgawad1,2, Danilo Badiali3, Olga Iorio1, Mario Rizzello1, Giuseppe Cavallaro1, Carola Severi3, Gianfranco Silecchia4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Crural closure in addition to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) represents a valuable option for the synchronous management of morbid obesity and hiatal defects, providing good outcomes in terms of weight loss and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms control. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the reinforced cruroplasty during LSG compared with a concurrent group of simple cruroplasty.
METHODS: The study groups included 96 morbidly obese patients who underwent simultaneous LSG and cruroplasty. Group A: 48 patients with hiatal areal defect <4 cm(2) and normal pillars (simple posterior cruroplasty); group B: 48 patients with hiatal areal defect >4 and <8 cm(2) with weakness of the right pillar (on-lay synthetic absorbable mesh-reinforced cruroplasty). Upper GI symptoms were assessed by Roma III standard questionnaire. Endoscopy, imaging, esophageal 24-h pH monitoring and HR manometry were performed in cases of persistent or recurrent symptoms after surgery.
RESULTS: Mortality rate was nil. The conversion rate to open was 1 %. Intra-operative diagnosis of hiatal hernia occured in 41 patients (42.7 %). Mesh-related complications were none. Perioperative complications occurred in four patients (4.1 %). After 19- to 21-month follow-up, GERD symptom remission occurred in 89 % of patients. GERD symptoms were detected postoperatively in eight patients: six in group A (five symptomatic and radiological recurrences and one persistent) and two in group B (one persistent and one de novo GERD) (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The synthetic absorbable mesh offers an effective option for crural repair during LSG with no clinical recurrences at 19 months. The midterm results of this prospective comparative study evaluating two different technical options for cruroplasty confirm that the simultaneous procedures are safe and cruroplasty is effective in mild-to-moderate GERD control .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bio-A absorbable mesh; Cruroplasty; GERD; Hiatal hernia; Morbid obesity; Sleeve gastrectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26428202     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4487-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  28 in total

1.  Combining laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair with sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Ankit D Patel; Edward Lin; Nathaniel W Lytle; Juan P Toro; Jahnavi Srinivasan; Arvinpal Singh; John F Sweeney; S Scott Davis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; M Fox; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino; W Schwizer; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  Simultaneous sleeve gastrectomy and hiatus hernia repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kamal K Mahawar; William R J Carr; Neil Jennings; Shlok Balupuri; Peter K Small
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Modified sequential therapy regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a systematic review.

Authors:  Angelo Zullo; Vincenzo De Francesco; Cesare Hassan; Lorenzo Ridola; Alessandro Repici; Vincenzo Bruzzese; Dino Vaira
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 4.088

5.  Laparoscopic repair of very large hiatus hernia with sutures versus absorbable mesh versus nonabsorbable mesh: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David I Watson; Sarah K Thompson; Peter G Devitt; Lorelle Smith; Simon D Woods; Ahmad Aly; Susan Gan; Philip A Game; Glyn G Jamieson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Body mass index and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Douglas A Corley; Ai Kubo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Constantine T Frantzides; Atul K Madan; Mark A Carlson; George P Stavropoulos
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-06

8.  Comparison of objective outcomes following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus laparoscopic gastric bypass in the morbidly obese with heartburn.

Authors:  E J Patterson; D G Davis; Y Khajanchee; L L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity.

Authors:  Girish Anand; Philip O Katz
Journal:  Rev Gastroenterol Disord       Date:  2008

10.  Long-term results of hiatal hernia mesh repair and antireflux laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  E Soricelli; N Basso; A Genco; M Cipriano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  20 in total

1.  Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy-5-Year Follow-Up Study in an Eastern European Emerging Bariatric Center.

Authors:  Radu Mircea Neagoe; Mircea Mureșan; Șerban Bancu; Ionuț Balmos; Vasile Băișan; Septimiu Voidăzan; Daniela Sala
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Mid-term safety profile evaluation of Bio-A absorbable synthetic mesh as cruroplasty reinforcement.

Authors:  Angelo Iossa; Gianfranco Silecchia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Hiatal Hernia, GERD, and Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Complex Interplay.

Authors:  Antonio Iannelli; Arnaud Sans; Francesco Martini; Antonella Santonicola; Paola Iovino; Luigi Angrisani
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: overview of pathogenesis and risk factors.

Authors:  Angelo Iossa; Mohamed Abdelgawad; Brad Michael Watkins; Gianfranco Silecchia
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Perioperative hemorrhagic complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: four-year experience of a bariatric center of excellence.

Authors:  Francesco De Angelis; Mohamed Abdelgawad; Mario Rizzello; Consalvo Mattia; Gianfranco Silecchia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Short-term outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy conversion to R-Y gastric bypass: multi-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Cristian Eugeniu Boru; Francesco Greco; Piero Giustacchini; Marco Raffaelli; Gianfranco Silecchia
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Intra-thoracic Sleeve Migration (ITSM): an Underreported Phenomenon After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Alan A Saber; Saeed Shoar; Mousa Khoursheed
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Management of Complications and Outcomes After Revisional Bariatric Surgery: 3-Year Experience at a Bariatric Center of Excellence.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelgawad; Francesco De Angelis; Angelo Iossa; Mario Rizzello; Giuseppe Cavallaro; Gianfranco Silecchia
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  The Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Flavia Carvalho Silveira; Christina Poa-Li; Matthew Pergamo; Akash Gujral; Sindhura Kolli; George A Fielding; Christine J Ren-Fielding; Bradley F Schwack
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Weight Regain and Diabetes Evolution After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Cohort Study with over 5 Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  D Capoccia; A Guida; F Coccia; G Guarisco; M Testa; F Leonetti; G Silecchia
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.