| Literature DB >> 26808043 |
Kathryn Elizabeth Lancaster1,2, Kimberly A Powers1, Thandie Lungu3, Pearson Mmodzi3, Mina C Hosseinipour3,2, Katy Chadwick4, Vivian F Go5, Brian W Pence1, Irving F Hoffman3,2, William C Miller1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The HIV care continuum among female sex workers (FSW), a key population, has not been well characterized, especially within the generalized epidemics of sub-Saharan Africa. This was the first study to characterize the HIV care continuum among FSW in Lilongwe, Malawi.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26808043 PMCID: PMC4726447 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147662
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Sociodemographics and sex work characteristics of female sex workers in Lilongwe, Malawi, July-September 2014.
| Total Population (n = 200) | HIV seronegative (n = 62) | HIV seropositive (n = 138) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | (%) | n | (%) | n | (%) | |
| Age (years) | ||||||
| 18–24 | 101 | (51) | 44 | (71) | 57 | (41) |
| 25–29 | 54 | (27) | 10 | (16) | 44 | (32) |
| ≥30 | 45 | (22) | 8 | (13) | 37 | (27) |
| Nationality | ||||||
| Malawian | 195 | (98) | 62 | (100) | 133 | (96) |
| Other | 5 | (2) | 0 | (0) | 5 | (4) |
| Education | ||||||
| Never attended school | 15 | (7) | 5 | (8) | 10 | (7) |
| Some primary | 117 | (59) | 36 | (58) | 81 | (59) |
| Completed primary | 20 | (10) | 3 | (5) | 17 | (12) |
| Some secondary | 44 | (22) | 15 | (24) | 29 | (21) |
| Completed secondary | 4 | (2) | 3 | (5) | 1 | (1) |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Never married | 28 | (14) | 13 | (21) | 15 | (11) |
| Married (legal or traditional) or co-habitating | 9 | (4) | 3 | (5) | 6 | (4) |
| Separated, divorced, or widowed | 162 | (81) | 45 | (73) | 117 | (85) |
| Housing | ||||||
| Private house | 27 | (13) | 10 | (16) | 17 | (12) |
| Bar or Bottle shop | 115 | (58) | 35 | (57) | 80 | (58) |
| Guesthouse or hotel | 58 | (29) | 17 | (27) | 41 | (30) |
| Number of pregnancies | ||||||
| 0 | 15 | (7) | 4 | (6) | 11 | (8) |
| 1 | 56 | (28) | 19 | (31) | 37 | (27) |
| ≥2 | 129 | (65) | 39 | (63) | 90 | (65) |
| Duration of sex work (years) | ||||||
| <1.0 | 25 | (12) | 10 | (16) | 15 | (11) |
| 1.0–1.9 | 39 | (20) | 15 | (24) | 24 | (17) |
| 2.0–2.9 | 34 | (17) | 12 | (19) | 22 | (16) |
| ≥3.0 | 100 | (50) | 23 | (37) | 77 | (56) |
| Location for soliciting clients | ||||||
| Bar or bottle shop | 181 | (91) | 57 | (92) | 124 | (90) |
| Other | 19 | (9) | 5 | (8) | 14 | (10) |
| Number of clients per week | ||||||
| <10 | 43 | (21) | 16 | (27) | 27 | (20) |
| 10–19 | 45 | (23) | 12 | (19) | 33 | (24) |
| 20–29 | 52 | (26) | 19 | (31) | 33 | (24) |
| ≥30 | 58 | (29) | 14 | (23) | 44 | (32) |
| Condom use with clients in past 7 days | ||||||
| Inconsistent | 49 | (24) | 13 | (21) | 36 | (26) |
| Consistent | 151 | (76) | 49 | (79) | 102 | (74) |
*Missing data due to not knowing or refused to answer: marital status: n = 1; number of years exchanging sex for money: n = 2; number of clients in past 7 days: n = 2
**Inconsistent includes FSW who responded “never”, “rarely”, “sometimes”, or “most times”; Consistent includes FSW who responded “always”.
HIV testing history, CD4 count, and VL at the time of cross-sectional survey by new and previous HIV diagnosis for female sex workers, (n = 138).
| New HIV diagnosis (n = 27) | Previous HIV diagnosis (n = 111) | |
|---|---|---|
| Median (Interquartile Range) | Median (Interquartile Range) | |
| Time since last HIV test (months) | 11 (3–17) | 14 (4–44) |
| CD4 count, cells/mm3 | 464 (276–632) | 528 (355–747) |
| Viral load, copies/ml | 44, 846 (5,981–202,395) | 0 (0–31,295) |
*Among those who report previously testing negative among new HIV diagnoses
Fig 1HIV Care Continuum among HIV-infected female sex workers, Lilongwe, Malawi (n = 138).
1A) Among all HIV-infected FSW; 1B) Among FSW achieving prior step. For Fig 1A, 69% (95/138) of all HIV-infected FSW had a history of care. Fifty-two percent (72/138) of all HIV-infected FSW reported current ART use and 45% (62/138) of all HIV-infected FSW were virally suppressed. For Fig 1B, 80% (111/138) of all HIV-infected FSW were previously diagnosed. While 86% (95/111) of FSW previously diagnosed had a history of HIV care. Seventy-six percent (72/95) of FSW with a history of HIV care reported current ART use. Eighty-six percent (62/72) of FSW reporting current ART use were virally suppressed.
Associations of demographic and transmission risk behaviors with HIV care continuum outcomes (previously HIV diagnosed, history of HIV care, and current ART use) among HIV-infected female sex workers in Lilongwe, Malawi.
| Previously HIV diagnosed (n = 138) | History of HIV care (n = 111) | Current ART use (n = 96) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | PR (95% CI) | APR | PR (95% CI) | APR | PR (95% CI) | APR |
| Age (years) | ||||||
| 18–24 | 0.89 (0.40, 2.01) | 0.74 (0.30, 1.84) | 0.91 (0.78, 1.07) | 0.99 (0.86, 1.14) | 0.90 (0.67, 1.17) | 0.98 (0.74, 1.31) |
| 25–29 | 0.84 (0.35, 2.02) | 0.81 (0.34, 1.91) | 0.87 (0.72, 1.04) | 0.89 (0.73, 1.08) | 0.88 (0.67, 1.17) | 0.93 (0.70, 1.23) |
| ≥30 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Duration of sex work (years) | ||||||
| <1.0 | 1.58 (0.60, 4.19) | 1.81 (0.62, 5.33) | 1.02 (0.83, 1.25) | 1.02 (0.83, 1.12) | 0.78 (0.49, 1.25) | 0.81 (0.49, 1.33) |
| 1.0–1.9 | 1.73 (0.78, 3.83) | 2.04 (0.85, 4.94) | 0.79 (0.58, 1.09) | 0.84 (0.63, 1.12) | 0.82 (0.56, 1.20) | 0.91 (0.62, 1.33) |
| 2.0–2.9 | 0.81 (0.25, 2.58) | 0.91 (0.28, 2.88) | 0.95 (0.76, 1.17) | 0.93 (0.75, 1.15) | 0.87 (0.62, 1.21) | 0.87 (0.60, 1.24) |
| ≥3.0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Number of clients per week | ||||||
| ≤19 | 0.64 (0.31, 1.33) | 0.67 (0.33, 1.36) | 1.13 (0.98, 1.31) | 1.12 (0.96, 1.30) | 1.11 (0.89, 1.39) | 1.10 (0.88, 1.38) |
| ≥20 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Condom use | ||||||
| Inconsistent | 1.42 (0.70, 2.86) | 1.65 (0.79, 3.47) | 0.94 (0.77, 1.14) | 0.90 (0.75, 1.01) | 1.12 (0.88, 1.43) | 1.08 (0.84, 1.38) |
| Consistent | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
PR: Prevalence Ratio; APR: Adjusted Prevalence Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval
*Adjusted for all other variables in table
**Inconsistent includes FSW who responded “never”, “rarely”, “sometimes”, or “most times”; Consistent includes FSW who responded “always”.