| Literature DB >> 26807726 |
Ewa Kosior-Jarecka1, Urszula Łukasik1, Dominika Wróbel-Dudzińska1, Janusz Kocki2, Joanna Bartosińska3, Agnieszka Witczak4, Grażyna Chodorowska3, Jerzy Mosiewicz4, Tomasz Żarnowski1.
Abstract
AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of polymorphisms of the eNOS gene on the clinical status of patients with normal and high tension glaucoma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26807726 PMCID: PMC4726562 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147540
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Frequency of allelic variants of polymorphisms of the eNOS gene in NTG and HTG patients.
| TT | GG | GT | p value | G allele | T allele | p value | |
| 13(8.6%) | 57(37.5%) | 82(53.9%) | 0,009 | 196(64.5%) | 108(35.5%) | 0,022 | |
| 8(8.2%) | 55(56.7%) | 34(35.1%) | 144(74.2%) | 50(25.8%) | |||
| TT | CT | p value | C allele | T allele | p value | ||
| 56(36.4%) | 20(13.0%) | 78(50.6%) | 0,330 | 118(38.3%) | 190(61.7%) | 0,165 | |
| 49(45.4%) | 11(10.2%) | 48(44.4%) | 70(32.7%) | 146(67.3%) | |||
Frequency of allelic variants of polymorphisms of the eNOS gene in female and male patients.
| 9(8.6%) | 41(39.4%) | 55(52.8%) | 0.88 | 73 (34,7%) | 137(65,3%) | 0.71 | |
| 4(8.7%) | 16(34.8%) | 26(56.5%) | 34(37%) | 58(63) | |||
| 5 (7.5%) | 39(58.2%) | 23(34.3%) | 0.89 | 125(59,5%) | 85(40,5%) | 0.23 | |
| 3(10.3%) | 16(55.2%) | 10(34.5%) | 64(66,6%) | 32(33,4%) | |||
| 37(35.2%) | 17(16.2%) | 51(48.6%) | 0.24 | 33(24,7%) | 101(75,3 | 0.66 | |
| 19(39.6%) | 3(6.2%) | 26(54.2%) | 16(27,6%) | 42(72,4%) | |||
| 30(44.8%) | 7(10.4%) | 30(44.8%) | 0.89 | 90(67,1%) | 44(32,9%) | 0.78 | |
| 13(50.0%) | 3(11.5%) | 10(38.5%) | 36 (69,2%) | 16(30.8%) | |||
Association of the polymorphic variants studied in NTG and HTG patients.
| rs 2070744 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs 1799983 | NTG | HTG | |||||
| TT | CC | TC | TT | CC | TC | ||
| TT | 0 | 4(2.7%) | 9(6.0%) | 0 | 2(2.2%) | 4(4.4%) | |
| GG | 30(20%) | 5(3.3%) | 21(14%) | 32(35.2%) | 2(2.2%) | 19(20.9%) | |
| GT | 24(16%) | 11(7.3%) | 46(30.7%) | 9(9.9%) | 7(7.7%) | 16(17.6%) | |
| p = 0.08 | p = 0.1 | ||||||
Maximum IOP according to the allelic variants of two polymorphisms.
| IOP (mmHg) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs 1799983 | rs 2070744 | |||||
| TT | GG | GT | TT | CC | TC | |
| 18.4 | 17.3 | 17.1 | 17.3 | 17.8 | 17.3 | |
| 26.7 | 24.6 | 24.5 | 24.1 | 26.8 | 25.1 | |
| F = 13.25; p = 0.000000 | F = 12.31; p = 0.000000 | |||||
Staging of glaucoma in the two groups according to mean deviation.
| MD | 0-6db | 6-12dB | 12-20dB | Over 20dB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.8% | 20.6% | 18.4% | 9.2% | |
| 33.3% | 18.7% | 24.0% | 24.0% | |
| p = 0.0022, OR = 2.42 | ||||
Relation of observed progression to allelic variants of the polymorphisms studied.
| TT | GG | GT | TT | CC | TC | |
| Progression | 6(36%) | 11 (61%) | 33 (77%) | 19 (54%) | 6 (54%) | 28(47%) |
| TT | GG | GT | TT | CC | TC | |
| Progression | 7 (46%) | 10 (40%) | 3(50%) | 10(29%) | 9(45%) | 11(22%) |
Relation between local glaucoma risk factors and polymorphic variants in NTG patients.
| rs 1799983 | rs 2070744 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG | GT | TT | TT | TC | CC | |
| 17% (3) | 11% (7) | 7% (1) | 11.4% (4) | 13.7% (7) | 9% (1) | |
| 66.7% (12) | 65.6% (40) | 50% (7) | 60% (21) | 66% (31) | 63.6% (7) | |
| 17% (3) | 21%(13) | 21% (3) | 23% (8) | 22% (11) | 0% (0) | |
Mean blood pressure indices in patients with the allelic variants studied.
| rs 1799983 | rs 2070744 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG | GT | TT | ANOVA | TT | TC | CC | ANOVA | |
| 128.7 | 133.7 | 119.3 | F = 1.23 p = 0.3 | 129.6 | 131.7 | 129.3 | F = 0.09 p = 0.9 | |
| 80.3 | 75.8 | 67.2 | F = 2.95 p = 0.06 | 78.4 | 79.9 | 64.9 | F = 7,35 p = 0.002 | |
| 113.2 | 110.8 | 105.7 | F = 0.40 p = 0.6 | 113.3 | 110.4 | 106.6 | F = 0.49 p = 0.62 | |
| 68.6 | 64.0 | 53.8 | F = 3.43 p = 0.04 | 66.9 | 66.4 | 57.2 | F = 2.39 p = 0.1 | |