Literature DB >> 26807358

Patient specific guides for total knee arthroplasty are ready for primetime.

Martijn Gm Schotanus1, Bert Boonen1, Nanne P Kort1.   

Abstract

AIM: To present the radiological results of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with use of patient specific matched guides (PSG) from different manufacturer in patients suffering from severe osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
METHODS: This study describes the results of 57 knees operated with 4 different PSG systems and a group operated with conventional instrumentation (n = 60) by a single surgeon. The PSG systems were compared with each other and subdivided into cut- and pin PSG. The biomechanical axis [hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA)], varus/valgus of the femur [frontal femoral component (FFC)] and tibia (frontal tibial component) component, flexion/extension of the femur [flexion/extension of the femur component (LFC)] and posterior slope of the tibia [lateral tibial component (LTC)] component were evaluated on long-leg standing and lateral X-rays. A percentage of > 3(°) deviation was seen as an outlier.
RESULTS: The inter class correlation coefficient (ICC) revealed that radiographic measurements between both assessors were reliable (ICC > 0.8). Fisher exact test was used to test differences of proportions. The percentage of outliers of the HKA-axis was comparable between both the PSG and conventional groups (12.28% vs 18.33%, P < 0.424) and the cut- and pin PSG groups (14.3% vs 10.3%, P < 1.00). The percentage of outliers of the FFC (0% vs 18.33%, P < 0.000), LFC (15.78% vs 58.33%, P < 0.000) and LTC (15.78% vs 41.67%, P < 0.033) were significant different in favour of the PSG group. There were no significant differences regarding the outliers between the individual PSG systems and the PSG group subdivided into cut- and pin PSG.
CONCLUSION: PSG for TKA show significant less outliers compared to the conventional technique. These single surgeon results suggest that PSG are ready for primetime.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alignment; Conventional instruments; Cutting guides; Patient matched instruments; Patient specific matched guides; Pin guides; Single surgeon; Total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2016        PMID: 26807358      PMCID: PMC4716573          DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i1.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthop        ISSN: 2218-5836


  32 in total

1.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement.

Authors:  R S Jeffery; R W Morris; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

2.  Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai Bauwens; Gerrit Matthes; Michael Wich; Florian Gebhard; Beate Hanson; Axel Ekkernkamp; Dirk Stengel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  A review of rapid prototyped surgical guides for patient-specific total knee replacement.

Authors:  S P Krishnan; A Dawood; R Richards; J Henckel; A J Hart
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-11

4.  Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement.

Authors:  P A Lotke; M L Ecker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations.

Authors:  J H Bargren; J D Blaha; M A Freeman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Jeffrey H DeClaire; Keith R Berend; Bethany C Gulick; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Novel fast semi-automated software to segment cartilage for knee MR acquisitions.

Authors:  J Duryea; G Neumann; M H Brem; W Koh; F Noorbakhsh; R D Jackson; J Yu; C B Eaton; P Lang
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Patient-specific computed tomography based instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Andrzej Kotela; Ireneusz Kotela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Component alignment during total knee arthroplasty with use of standard or custom instrumentation: a randomized clinical trial using computed tomography for postoperative alignment measurement.

Authors:  Steven T Woolson; Alex H S Harris; David W Wagner; Nicholas J Giori
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Comparison of custom to standard TKA instrumentation with computed tomography.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Lindsay Arnott; Jia Li; Ronald Hopkins; Jamie Lewis; Sean Sutphen; Lisa Nicholson; Douglas Reader; Michael A McShane
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the accuracy of resected bone thickness based on patient-specific instrumentation during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazumasa Yamamura; Fumiaki Inori; Sadahiko Konishi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martijn G M Schotanus; Elke Thijs; Marion Heijmans; Rein Vos; Nanne P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A short-term radiological and clinical comparison between the bi-cruciate and cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty A retrospective case controlled study.

Authors:  S Kalaai; Y F L Bemelmans; M Scholtes; B Boonen; E H van Haaren; M G M Schotanus
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-04-26

4.  No radiological and clinical advantages with patient-specific positioning guides in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Justin A M J Van Leeuwen; Finnur Snorrason; Stephan M Röhrl
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.