| Literature DB >> 26807266 |
Chang-Dae Jeong1, Lovelia L Mamuad1, Jong Youl Ko2, Ha Guyn Sung3, Keun Kyu Park4, Yoo Kyung Lee5, Sang-Suk Lee1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of adding Korean rice wine residue (RWR) in total mixed ration (TMR) on in vitro ruminal fermentation and growth performance of growing Hanwoo steers.Entities:
Keywords: By-products; Hanwoo steers; In vitro; Korean rice wine residue
Year: 2016 PMID: 26807266 PMCID: PMC4722661 DOI: 10.1186/s40781-016-0084-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Technol ISSN: 2055-0391
Composition, nutrient content and feed cost of total mixed ration containing Korean rice wine residue (RWR) at different inclusion rates for Hanwoo steers at growing stage
| Parameters | Treatments | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Con | T1 | T2 | |
| Feed composition(% of DM) | |||
| Oat hay | 41.32 | 38.17 | 36.26 |
| Timothy hay | 14.75 | 13.63 | 13.79 |
| Alfalfa hay | 4.77 | 4.41 | 4.46 |
| Wheat grain | 4.78 | 3.19 | 3.23 |
| Corn | 18.34 | 15.72 | 15.91 |
| Corn gluten feed | 3.34 | 3.12 | 3.16 |
| Lupine | 6.63 | 6.13 | 6.20 |
| Brewers grain | 4.13 | 3.82 | 0.00 |
| Salt | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| Limestone | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.54 |
| RWRa | 0.00 | 10.03 | 15.19 |
| Molasses | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Vitamin-mineral mix | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.50 |
| Nutrient content (% of DM) | |||
| Crude protein (CP) | 14.62 | 15.52 | 15.56 |
| Ether extract (EE) | 3.93 | 3.60 | 3.22 |
| Ash | 9.60 | 10.10 | 9.65 |
| Crude fiber (CF) | 18.58 | 24.17 | 24.39 |
| Nitrogen free extract (NFE) | 53.27 | 46.61 | 47.17 |
| Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) | 49.13 | 61.67 | 59.91 |
| Acid detergent fiber (ADF) | 34.94 | 36.03 | 34.78 |
| Total digestible nutrient (TDN)b | 66.12 | 65.40 | 66.22 |
aKorean rice wine residue; bTDN = 88.936-(0.653*ADF)
Control (Con: 0 % RWR + TMR), Treatment 1 (T1: 10 % RWR + TMR), Treatment 2 (T2: 15 % RWR + TMR)
In vitro rumen fermentation parameters as affected by the addition of Korean rice wine residue (RWR)
| Parameters | Incubation | Con | T1 | T2 | SEM |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| time (h) | All | C vs T | |||||
| Total gas (ml) | 0 | 62.67 | 65.00 | 64.33 | 1.181 | 0.460 | 0.248 |
| 12 | 104.00 | 100.67 | 101.33 | 1.264 | 0.312 | 0.149 | |
| 24 | 122.00 | 120.67 | 121.00 | 1.953 | 0.884 | 0.643 | |
| 48 | 150.33 | 155.00 | 166.33 | 10.630 | 0.608 | 0.479 | |
| pH | 0 | 6.60 | 6.62 | 6.64 | 0.014 | 0.163 | 0.101 |
| 12 | 6.43a | 6.38ab | 6.28c | 0.033 | 0.046 | 0.049 | |
| 24 | 6.23 | 6.27 | 6.30 | 0.050 | 0.655 | 0.411 | |
| 48 | 6.18 | 6.18 | 6.16 | 0.044 | 0.949 | 0.876 | |
| Ammonia Nitrogen (mM) | 0 | 3.39 | 3.41 | 3.44 | 0.490 | 0.998 | 0.956 |
| 12 | 5.77a | 5.26a | 3.65b | 0.281 | 0.029 | 0.031 | |
| 24 | 7.65 | 6.09 | 6.19 | 0.887 | 0.598 | 0.340 | |
| 48 | 13.54 | 11.25 | 12.56 | 1.362 | 0.586 | 0.408 | |
Values are shown as mean. Means for the same period (0 h, 12 h, 24 h, or 48 h) marked with the same letters (a > b > c) did not differ significantly within treatments (P < 0.05), as determined by Duncan's multiple range test. SEM is the standard error mean. C vs T is the comparison between control and treatments. Control (Con: 0 % RWR + TMR), Treatment 1 (T1: 10 % RWR + TMR), Treatment 2 (T2: 15 % RWR + TMR)
In vitro volatile fatty acid concentration as affected by the addition of Korean rice wine residue (RWR)
| Parameters | Incubation time (h) | Con | T1 | T2 | SEM |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | C vs T | ||||||
| Acetate | 0 | 23.88 | 23.56 | 23.57 | 0.163 | 0.075 | 0.081 |
| (mM) | 12 | 31.74a | 28.52ab | 26.64b | 1.348 | 0.101 | 0.050 |
| 24 | 38.05a | 36.04ab | 32.54b | 1.310 | 0.075 | 0.067 | |
| 48 | 41.81 | 41.21 | 40.77 | 0.361 | 0.387 | 0.224 | |
| Propionate | 0 | 5.09 | 5.10 | 5.24 | 0.059 | 0.238 | 0.199 |
| (mM) | 12 | 13.87 | 11.06 | 9.79 | 1.238 | 0.169 | 0.080 |
| 24 | 18.44a | 16.49a | 12.60b | 0.558 | 0.017 | 0.016 | |
| 48 | 20.64 | 19.14 | 19.92 | 0.574 | 0.297 | 0.191 | |
| Butyrate | 0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| (mM) | 12 | 8.51a | 7.38ab | 5.71b | 0.568 | 0.062 | 0.051 |
| 24 | 8.83b | 10.82b | 15.64a | 1.060 | 0.015 | 0.021 | |
| 48 | 11.74 | 12.12 | 15.28 | 1.735 | 0.404 | 0.430 | |
| Total VFA | 0 | 28.97 | 28.67 | 28.81 | 0.087 | 0.269 | 0.236 |
| (mM) | 12 | 54.13 | 46.96 | 42.15 | 2.699 | 0.068 | 0.017 |
| 24 | 69.95a | 63.35b | 60.78b | 1.569 | 0.014 | 0.030 | |
| 48 | 74.19 | 72.47 | 75.98 | 2.379 | 0.578 | 0.761 | |
| A:P | 0 | 4.69a | 4.62ab | 4.50b | 0.025 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| 12 | 2.33 | 2.64 | 2.73 | 0.155 | 0.243 | 0.302 | |
| 24 | 2.32 | 2.21 | 2.59 | 0.105 | 0.126 | 0.057 | |
| 48 | 2.03 | 2.15 | 2.05 | 0.052 | 0.409 | 0.330 |
Values are shown as mean. Means for the same period (0 h, 12 h, 24 h, or 48 h) marked with the same letters (a > b > c) did not differ significantly within treatments (P < 0.05), as determined by Duncan's multiple range test. SEM is the standard error mean. C vs T is the comparison between control and treatments. Control (Con: 0 % RWR + TMR), Treatment 1 (T1: 10 % RWR + TMR), Treatment 2 (T2: 15 % RWR + TMR)
Growth performance and blood profiles of Hanwoo steers fed with or without Korean rice wine residue
| Parameters | Con | T1 | T2 | SEM |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | C vs T | |||||
| Growth performance | ||||||
| Total gain (kg) | 153.33b | 168.00a | 160.83ab | 2.816 | 0.013 | 0.009 |
| ADG (kg/d) | 1.00b | 1.09a | 1.04ab | 0.018 | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Feed intake | 9.81 | 9.70 | 9.90 | 0.105 | 0.04 | 0.845 |
| Feed efficiency | 0.102 | 0.112 | 0.105 | 0.002 | 0.053 | 0.082 |
| Blood profiles | ||||||
| Ethanol (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 3.68 | 3.66 | 3.87 | 0.088 | 0.202 | 0.45 |
| AST/SGOT (U/L) | 66.78 | 59 | 59.89 | 3.406 | 0.246 | 0.099 |
| ALT/SGPT (U/L) | 26.89 | 23.89 | 24.00 | 1.673 | 0.374 | 0.165 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 63.00 | 60.56 | 69.56 | 3.044 | 0.124 | 0.591 |
| T. Chol (mg/dL) | 114.22 | 110 | 123.33 | 6.248 | 0.358 | 0.764 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 26.11 | 25.44 | 30.44 | 2.571 | 0.356 | 0.572 |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 17.33 | 14.89 | 18.44 | 1.202 | 0.124 | 0.655 |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 99.33b | 96.56b | 108.44a | 5.804 | 0.369 | 0.675 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.80b | 0.80b | 0.97a | 0.047 | 0.028 | 0.178 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 14.14b | 16.47a | 11.04c | 0.755 | 0 | 0.679 |
| Total protein (g/dL) | 6.39ab | 6.19b | 6.61a | 0.107 | 0.04 | 0.935 |
Values are shown as mean. Means for the same period (0 h, 12 h, 24 h, or 48 h) marked with the same letters (a > b > c) did not differ significantly within treatments (P < 0.05), as determined by Duncan's multiple range test. SEM is the standard error mean. C vs T is the comparison between control and treatments. Control (Con: 0 % RWR + TMR), Treatment 1 (T1: 10 % RWR + TMR), Treatment 2 (T2: 15 % RWR + TMR)