| Literature DB >> 26806972 |
Barakat Sayed El-Alfy1, Ayman M Ali1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical reconstruction of segmental skeletal defects represents a true challenge for the orthopedic surgeons. Recently, Masquelet et al. described a two-stage technique for reconstruction of bone defects, known as the induced membrane technique. The aim of this study is to assess the results of the induced membrane technique in the management of segmental skeletal defects resulting from debridement of bone infection.Entities:
Keywords: Bone defects; Bone diseases; bone cements; bone infection; induced membrane technique; infections; membranes
Year: 2015 PMID: 26806972 PMCID: PMC4705731 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.168757
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Orthop ISSN: 0019-5413 Impact factor: 1.251
Figure 1Peroperative photographs showing (a) All the infected and necrotic bones are excised down to a healthy bleeding surface. (b) The resultant defect is filled with bone cement. (c) In the second stage of surgery, the cement spacer is removed and the bone ends are further debrided. (d) The graft is harvested and divided into small chips. (e) The gap is filled with the cancellus bone graft. (f) The tube of the membrane is closed over the graft
Figure 2(a) Radiograph of thigh anteroposterior view after the first stage of surgery in 38-year-old male patient with infected non united fracture of the shaft femur (b) The radiograph after the second stage (c) During healing of the graft (d) After removal of the frame with good healing of the graft (e) The patient with good alignment and good range of knee movements
Figure 3(a) Radiograph of leg bones with ankle anteroposterior and lateral views of a 52-year-old male patient with infected non united pilon fracture with implant failure. (b) The radiograph after debridement and bone cement spacer. (c) The early postoperative radiograph after the second stage of surgery. (d) Radiograph 7 months after the second stage, the graft united up and down but failed to unite at its middle so, osteotomy of the fibula was decided. (e) After removal of the frame with good healing of the graft. (f) The patient with good alignment and stable limb
Data of the patients
Figure 4On the second look, the active biological chamber is evident with high vascularity and areas of new bone formation