Vina N Slev1, Patriek Mistiaen2, H Roeline W Pasman3, Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw4, Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan5, Anneke L Francke6. 1. VU University Medical Center, Department of Public and Occupational Health, The EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: v.slev@vumc.nl. 2. NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research Utrecht, Netherlands. 3. VU University Medical Center, Department of Public and Occupational Health, The EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 4. VU University Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Psychology, The EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam, Netherlands. 5. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Psychology, The EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam, Netherlands. 6. VU University Medical Center, Department of Public and Occupational Health, The EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands; NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research Utrecht, Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: eHealth can be defined as information provision about illness or health care and/or support for patients and/or informal caregivers, using the computer or related technologies. eHealth interventions are increasingly being used in cancer care, e.g. to support patients and informal caregivers in managing symptoms and problems in daily life. OBJECTIVES: To synthesize evidence from systematic reviews on the effects of eHealth for cancer patients or their informal caregivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic meta-review, in the sense of a systematic review of reviews, was conducted. Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library. All steps in the review process were either performed by two reviewers independently or checked by a second reviewer. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: Ten systematic reviews were included. All reviews focused on the effects of eHealth for patients and none on effects for informal caregivers. Except for one review of high methodological quality, all reviews were of moderate methodological quality. Evidence was found for effects on perceived support, knowledge levels, and information competence of cancer patients. Indications of evidence were found for health status and healthcare participation. Findings were inconsistent for outcomes related to decision-making, psychological wellbeing, depression and anxiety, and quality of life. No evidence was found for effects on physical and functional wellbeing. CONCLUSION: There is evidence for positive effects of eHealth on perceived support, knowledge, and information competence of cancer patients. For effects on other outcomes in cancer patients, findings are mainly inconsistent or lacking. This meta-review did not find relevant reviews focusing on or including the effects of eHealth on informal caregivers, which seems a rather unexplored area.
BACKGROUND: eHealth can be defined as information provision about illness or health care and/or support for patients and/or informal caregivers, using the computer or related technologies. eHealth interventions are increasingly being used in cancer care, e.g. to support patients and informal caregivers in managing symptoms and problems in daily life. OBJECTIVES: To synthesize evidence from systematic reviews on the effects of eHealth for cancerpatients or their informal caregivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic meta-review, in the sense of a systematic review of reviews, was conducted. Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library. All steps in the review process were either performed by two reviewers independently or checked by a second reviewer. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: Ten systematic reviews were included. All reviews focused on the effects of eHealth for patients and none on effects for informal caregivers. Except for one review of high methodological quality, all reviews were of moderate methodological quality. Evidence was found for effects on perceived support, knowledge levels, and information competence of cancerpatients. Indications of evidence were found for health status and healthcare participation. Findings were inconsistent for outcomes related to decision-making, psychological wellbeing, depression and anxiety, and quality of life. No evidence was found for effects on physical and functional wellbeing. CONCLUSION: There is evidence for positive effects of eHealth on perceived support, knowledge, and information competence of cancerpatients. For effects on other outcomes in cancerpatients, findings are mainly inconsistent or lacking. This meta-review did not find relevant reviews focusing on or including the effects of eHealth on informal caregivers, which seems a rather unexplored area.
Authors: Karen L Syrjala; Jean C Yi; Samantha B Artherholt; Joan M Romano; Marie-Laure Crouch; Allison S Fiscalini; Mark T Hegel; Mary E D Flowers; Paul J Martin; Wendy M Leisenring Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2018-05-05 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: N Fridriksdottir; S Gunnarsdottir; S Zoëga; B Ingadottir; E J G Hafsteinsdottir Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Liza van Deursen; Anke Versluis; Rosalie van der Vaart; Lucille Standaar; Jeroen Struijs; Niels Chavannes; Jiska J Aardoom Journal: JMIR Cancer Date: 2022-06-14
Authors: Anna C Singleton; Rebecca Raeside; Karice K Hyun; Stephanie R Partridge; Gian Luca Di Tanna; Nashid Hafiz; Qiang Tu; Justin Tat-Ko; Stephanie Che Mun Sum; Kerry A Sherman; Elisabeth Elder; Julie Redfern Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Anouk S Schuit; Valesca van Zwieten; Karen Holtmaat; Pim Cuijpers; Simone E J Eerenstein; C René Leemans; Marije R Vergeer; Jens Voortman; Hakki Karagozoglu; Stijn van Weert; Mira Korte; Ruud Frambach; Margot Fleuren; Jan-Jaap Hendrickx; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 2.328