| Literature DB >> 26805879 |
Soyoung Park1, Sunhye Shin2, Yeseo Lim3, Jae Hoon Shin4, Je Kyung Seong5,6,7, Sung Nim Han8,9.
Abstract
Korean pine nut oil (PNO) has been reported to influence weight gain and lipid metabolism. We examined whether PNO replacement in a high-fat diet (HFD) can ameliorate HFD-induced hepatic steatosis. Five-week-old male C57BL mice were fed control diets containing 10% of the energy from fat from PNO or soybean oil (SBO) (PC, SC) or HFDs with 45% of the energy from fat, with 10% from PNO or SBO and 35% from lard (PHFD, SHFD), for 12 weeks. Body weight gain and amount of white adipose tissue were lower in PHFD (10% and 18% lower, respectively) compared with SHFD. Hepatic triacylglycerol (TG) level was significantly lower in PHFD than the SHFD (26% lower). PNO consumption upregulated hepatic ACADL mRNA levels. The hepatic PPARG mRNA level was lower in the PC than in the SC. Expression of the sirtuin (SIRT) 3 protein in white adipose tissue was down-regulated in the SHFD and restored in the PHFD to the level in the lean control mice. SIRT 3 was reported to be upregulated under conditions of caloric restriction (CR) and plays a role in regulating mitochondrial function. PNO consumption resulted in lower body fat and hepatic TG accumulation in HFD-induced obesity, which seemed to be associated with the CR-mimetic response.Entities:
Keywords: SIRT3; hepatic steatosis; high-fat diet; obesity; pine nut oil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26805879 PMCID: PMC4728670 DOI: 10.3390/nu8010059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Composition of the experimental diets 1.
| Control Diet (g) (10% of the kcal from Fat) | High-Fat Diet (g) (45% of the kcal from Fat) | |
|---|---|---|
| 10% Oil | 10% Oil + 35% Lard | |
| Casein | 200 | 200 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| Sucrose | 350 | 172.8 |
| Cornstarch | 315 | 72.8 |
| Dyetrose | 35 | 100 |
| PNO 2 or SBO | 45 | 45 |
| Lard | 0 | 157.5 |
| t-Butylhydroquinone | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Cellulose | 50 | 50 |
| Mineral Mix 3 | 35 | 35 |
| Vitamin Mix 4 | 10 | 10 |
| Choline Bitartrate | 2 | 2 |
| Total | 1045.0 | 848.1 |
| kcal/g diet | 3.69 | 4.64 |
1 Resource: Dyets, Inc, Bethlehem, PA, USA. 2 PNO was a gift from the Dubio Co., Ltd. 3 Thirty-five grams of mineral mix (Dyets, #210099) provides 1.0 g of sodium, 1.6 g of chloride, 0.5 g of magnesium, 0.33 g of sulfur, 59 mg of manganese, 45 mg of iron, 29 mg of zinc, 6 mg of copper, 2 mg of chromium, 1.6 mg of molybdenum, 0.16 mg of selenium, 0.9 mg of fluoride, 0.2 mg of iodine and 3.99 g of sucrose. 4 Ten grams of vitamin mix (Dyets, #300050) provides 4000 IU vitamin A, 1000 IU vitamin D3, 50 IU vitamin E, 30 mg of niacin, 16 mg of pantothenic acid, 7 mg of vitamin B6, 6 mg of vitamin B1, 6 mg of vitamin B2, 2 mg of folic acid, 0.5 mg of menadione, 0.2 mg of biotin, 10 µg of vitamin B12 and 9.78 g of sucrose.
Fatty acid composition of the experimental diets (% of fatty acids) 1.
| SBO | PNO | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Diet (SC) | High-Fat Diet (SHFD) | Control Diet (PC) | High-Fat Diet (PHFD) | |
| Myristic acid (C14:0) | ND | 0.9 | ND | 0.9 |
| Palmitic acid (C16:0) | 11.9 | 18.9 | 7.0 | 17.8 |
| Stearic acid (C18:0) | 4.8 | 11.1 | 3.6 | 10.7 |
| Total saturated fatty acid | 16.7 | 30.9 | 10.6 | 29.4 |
| Palmitoleic acid (C16:1, Δ9) | ND | 1.4 | ND | 1.4 |
| Oleic acid (C18:1, Δ9) | 21.1 | 34.7 | 27.4 | 36.0 |
| Total monounsaturated fatty acid | 21.1 | 36.1 | 27.4 | 37.4 |
| Linoleic acid (C18:2, Δ9, 12) | 54.9 | 30.3 | 47.2 | 28.6 |
| α-linolenic acid (C18:3, Δ9, 12, 15) | 7.4 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 1.3 |
| Pinolenic acid (C18:3, Δ5, 9, 12) | ND | ND | 14.0 | 3.3 |
| Total polyunsaturated fatty acid | 62.3 | 33.1 | 62.0 | 33.2 |
ND, not detected; 1 Fatty acid composition was determined by a gas chromatographic method.
Primer sequences used in real-time PCR quantitative analysis.
| Gene | Function | Forward Primer (5′–3′) | Reverse Primer (5′–3′) |
|---|---|---|---|
| fatty liver indicator | TTGCTCAGCTCTGGGGCT | GGCAAGTGGTCTCCAGTGTG | |
| transcription factor promoting fatty acid oxidation | GCAGTGGAAGAATCGGACCT | CAACCCGCCTTTTGTCATAC | |
| mitochondrial β-oxidation | GATGTTCTTCGTCTGGCTTGA | CTTATCGTGGTGGTGGGTGT | |
| mitochondrial β-oxidation | TCGCAATATAGGGCATGACA | ACTTGGGAAGAGCAAGCGTA | |
| mitochondrial β-oxidation | CCCTTTGAACACTTGCTGCT | GCCCAGGTCTCTGTGGATAA | |
| peroxisomal β-oxidation | GTCAAAGGCATCCACCAAAG | GAGGGGAACATCATCACAGG | |
| microsomal ω-oxidation | CAGAAAGGAGGGAAGATGGAG | CATGGTCTCCAAAATCCAAGG | |
| anti-oxidative defense | TTAGAGCAGGCAGCAATCTGT | GCGTGACTTTGGGTCTTTTG | |
| anti-oxidative defense | CAGGTCACTGTGCCCTTACCA | CACTACGTTCCAGGATCCCAA | |
| transcription factor promoting adipogenesis | CAGCAGGTTGTCTTGGATGTC | AGCCCTTTGGTGACTTTATGG | |
| GTCTCCACCACTTCGGGTTT | CGACTACATCCGCTTCTTGC | ||
| GCGGTGTGAAAACGAACTTT | CTGTCTGGGCATAACGGTCT | ||
| TTCCCTTTAGCCCTTGTTCC | TGACCAGACTTCCTCCAACC | ||
| fatty acid transport | GAACTCATTGCGGACCACTT | CATCCAGAAAGGGAAGGACAT | |
| fatty acid transport | CCAAGCTATTGCGACATGATT | TCTCAATGTCCGAGACTTTTCA | |
| endogenous control | GGAGAAACCTGCCAAGTA | AAGAGTGGGAGTTGCTGTTG |
Ahsg/fetuin-A, alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein; Ppara, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha; Cpt1a, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1a; Acadl, long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase; Acox1, acyl-CoA oxidase 1; Cyp4a10, cytochrome P450 family 4 subfamily a polypeptide 10; Hadha, hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase alpha subunit; Sod2, superoxide dismutase 2; Ucp2, uncoupling protein 2; Pparg, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma; Srebf1, sterol regulatory element-binding transcription factor 1; Fasn, fatty acid synthase; Slc25a1, solute carrier family 25 member 1; Fabp1, fatty acid binding protein 1; Cd36, cluster of differentiation 36; Gapdh, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Body weights, energy intakes, and adipose tissue weights.
| SC ( | PC ( | SHFD ( | PHFD ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fat Amount | Oil Type | Interaction | |||||
| Body weight at 0 week (g) | 17.3 ± 0.5 | 16.7 ± 0.4 | 17.0 ± 0.4 | 17.0 ± 0.3 | 0.97 | 0.56 | 0.50 |
| Body weight at 12 weeks (g) | 32.8 ± 1.0 ab | 30.5 ± 0.6 a | 38.5 ± 1.4 c | 34.6 ± 1.4 b | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.49 |
| Weight gain (g) | 15.5 ± 0.8 ab | 13.8 ± 0.6 a | 21.5 ± 1.1 c | 17.5 ± 1.3 b | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.32 |
| Average daily food intake (g/day) | 3.20 ± 0.06 b | 3.20 ± 0.03 b | 2.82 ± 0.05 a | 2.76 ± 0.04 a | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.48 |
| Average daily energy intake (kcal/day) 1 | 11.8 ± 0.2 a | 11.8 ± 0.1 a | 13.1 ± 0.2 b | 12.8 ± 0.2 b | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.43 |
| Total white adipose tissue (g) 2 | 3.1 ± 0.2 b | 2.2 ± 0.2 a | 5.3 ± 0.4 d | 4.4 ± 0.4 c | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.95 |
| Epididymal (g) | 1.3 ± 0.1 b | 0.9 ± 0.1 a | 2.2 ± 0.2 c | 1.9 ± 0.2 c | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Retroperitoneal and perirenal (g) | 0.60 ± 0.04 b | 0.41 ± 0.05 a | 0.99 ± 0.06 c | 0.84 ± 0.08 c | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.79 |
| Abdominal subcutaneous (g) | 1.2 ± 0.1 a | 0.9 ± 0.1 a | 2.1 ± 0.2 c | 1.7 ± 0.2 b | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.52 |
Values are presented as the mean ± SE. Two-way ANOVA was used to determine the significant effects of the fat amount and oil type and was followed by a LSD post-hoc test. Means in a row without a common superscript are significantly different (p < 0.05). 1 Average daily energy intake (kcal/day) = Average daily food intake (g/day) × Energy per g diet (kcal/g diet); 2 WAT weight is the sum of the weights of the epididymal, abdominal subcutaneous, and retroperitoneal-perirenal depots.
Serum lipid and leptin levels.
| SC ( | PC ( | SHFD ( | PHFD ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fat Amount | Oil Type | Interaction | |||||
| Serum triacylglycerol (mg/dL) | 116.0 ± 8.4 | 133.5 ± 10.4 | 163.0 ± 33.8 | 118.1 ± 16.1 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.13 |
| Serum cholesterol (mg/dL) | 282.8 ± 10.5 | 250.2 ± 15.7 | 284.7 ± 22.1 | 258.1 ± 16.2 | 0.77 | 0.09 | 0.86 |
| Serum NEFA (mmol/L) | 1.09 ± 0.08 | 1.35 ± 0.08 | 1.71 ± 0.40 | 1.62 ± 0.29 | 0.09 | 0.73 | 0.50 |
| Serum leptin (ng/mL) | 19.9 ± 2.8 ab | 12.6 ± 2.0 a | 43.3 ± 6.8 c | 29.2 ± 4.5 b | <0.01 | 0.02 | 0.46 |
Values are presented as the mean ± SE. Two-way ANOVA was used to determine the significant effects of the fat amount and oil type and was followed by a LSD post-hoc test. Means in a row without a common superscript are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Liver weight and liver lipid levels (a) liver weight; (b) liver triacylglycerol (TG); (c) liver cholesterol; (d) representative photomicrographs of liver sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (×200), and (e) representative photomicrographs of liver sections stained with Oil red O (×200). Values are the mean ± SE (SC, n = 10; PC, n = 11; SHFD, n = 11; PHFD, n = 11). Two-way ANOVA was used to determine the effects of the fat amount and oil type and was followed by a LSD post-hoc test. Labeled means without a common superscript represent a significant difference at p < 0.05. Student’s t test was used for comparison between the PC and SC groups or the PHFD and SHFD groups if the interaction was significant. * indicates a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 2Hepatic fetuin-A mRNA and serum fetuin-A levels (a) hepatic fetuin-A mRNA level; (b) serum fetuin-A level; (c) correlation between hepatic fetuin-A mRNA and Acadl mRNA levels. The serum fetuin-A level was measured by ELISA (SC, n = 10; PC, n = 11; SHFD, n = 11; PHFD, n = 11). The mRNA level was determined by a real-time PCR method (n = 6 per group). Values are the mean ± SE. Two-way ANOVA was used to determine the effects of the fat amount and oil type and was followed by a LSD post-hoc test. Labeled means without a common superscript represent a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Expression of hepatic genes involved in fatty acid oxidation, oxidative stress, and lipogenic pathways (a) hepatic mRNA levels of genes involved in fatty acid oxidation and oxidative stress and (b) hepatic mRNA levels of genes involved in lipogenic pathways. The mRNA level was determined by a real-time PCR method. Values are the mean ± SE (n = 6 per group). Two-way ANOVA was used to determine the effects of the fat amount and oil type and was followed by a LSD post-hoc test. Labeled means without a common superscript represent a significant difference at p < 0.05. Student’s t test was used for comparison between the PC and SC groups or the PHFD and SHFD groups if the interaction was significant. * indicates a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 4SIRT3 protein expression in white adipose tissue. Epididymal adipose tissue protein (50 μg) was used for western blot analysis. A representative image is presented. The intensity of the SIRT3 band was densitometrically measured and normalized to the level of β-Actin. Values are the mean ± SE (SC, n = 5; PC, n = 5; SHFD, n = 6; PHFD, n = 6). Two-way ANOVA was used to determine the effects of the fat amount and oil type and was followed by a LSD post-hoc test. Labeled means without a common superscript represent a significant difference at p < 0.05.
NAFLD activity scores of mice fed control diets or HFDs containing SBO or PNO.
| SC ( | PC ( | SHFD ( | PHFD ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fat Amount | Oil Type | Interaction | |||||
| Steatosis | 1.00 ± 0.26 | 0.71 ± 0.29 | 1.00 ± 0.31 | 0.86 ± 0.26 | 0.80 | 0.46 | 0.80 |
| Ballooning | 0.50 ± 0.34 | 0.57 ± 0.37 | 1.00 ± 0.38 | 0.86 ± 0.34 | 0.29 | 0.92 | 0.77 |
| Inflammation | 0.50 ± 0.22 | 0.14 ± 0.14 | 0.29 ± 0.18 | 0.14 ± 0.14 | 0.54 | 0.16 | 0.54 |
| NAFLD activity score (NAS) | 2.00 ± 0.52 | 1.43 ± 0.48 | 2.29 ± 0.64 | 1.86 ± 0.63 | 0.54 | 0.40 | 0.90 |
Hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) staining was used for evaluation of steatosis, degeneration of hepatocyte, and inflammation and accumulation of fat droplet was also confirmed by oil red O staining. Steatosis, hepatocellular ballooning, and lobular inflammation were graded as described previously [45] with modification. The degree of steatosis was graded using on a scale: grade 0, minimal; grade 1, moderate; grade 2, severe. Hepatocellular ballooning graded using on a scale: grade 0, minimal; grade 1, a few balloon cells; grade 2, many/prominent balloon cells. Lobular inflammation was graded on a scale: grade 0, fewer than two foci per ×20 field; grade 1, two to four foci per ×20 field; grade 2, more than four foci per ×20 field. For the NAFLD activity score (NAS), grades of steatosis, hepatocellular ballooning, and lobular inflammation were combined, ranging from 0 to 6.