Literature DB >> 26805665

First experience with robotic spleen-saving, vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy in Singapore: a report of three consecutive cases.

Brian Kp Goh1,2, Jen-San Wong1, Chung-Yip Chan1, Peng-Chung Cheow1,2, London Lpj Ooi1,2,3, Alexander Yf Chung1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has increased worldwide due to the reported advantages associated with this minimally invasive procedure. However, widespread adoption is hindered by its technical complexity. Robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) was introduced to overcome this limitation, but worldwide experience with RDP is still lacking. There is presently evidence that RDP is associated with decreased conversion rate and increased splenic preservation as compared to LDP.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective study on our initial experience with robotic spleen-saving, vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SSVP-DP) between July 2013 and April 2014.
RESULTS: Three consecutive patients underwent attempted robotic SSVP-DP. The indications were a 2.1-cm indeterminate cystic neoplasm, 4.5-cm solid pseudopapillary neoplasm and 1.2-cm pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour. For all three patients, the procedure was completed without conversion, and the spleen, with its main vessels, was successfully conserved. The median total operation time, blood loss and postoperative stay were 350 (range 300-540) minutes, 200 (range 50-300) mL and 7 (range 6-14) days, respectively. Two patients had minor Clavien-Dindo Grade I complications (one Grade A pancreatic fistula and one postoperative ileus). One patient had a Clavien-Dindo Grade IIIa complication (Grade B pancreatic fistula requiring percutaneous drainage). All patients were well at the time of reporting after at least six months of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Our preliminary experience with robotic SSVP-DP confirmed the feasibility of the procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  da Vinci; laparoscopic; minimally invasive; pancreatectomy; robotic

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26805665      PMCID: PMC4993972          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2016020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  45 in total

1.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Current status of robotic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roberto Cirocchi; Stefano Partelli; Andrea Coratti; Jacopo Desiderio; Amilcare Parisi; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.279

3.  The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre.

Authors:  Murtaza Shakir; Brian A Boone; Patricio M Polanco; Mazen S Zenati; Melissa E Hogg; Allan Tsung; Haroon A Choudry; A James Moser; David L Bartlett; Herbert J Zeh; Amer H Zureikat
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Robot-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a single surgeon's experiences and proposal of clinical application.

Authors:  Ho Kyoung Hwang; Chang Moo Kang; Young Eun Chung; Kyung Ah Kim; Sung Hoon Choi; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Distal pancreatectomy: a single institution's experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches.

Authors:  Ser Yee Lee; Peter J Allen; Eran Sadot; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Validation of five contemporary prognostication systems for primary pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: results from a single institution experience with 61 surgically treated cases.

Authors:  Brian K P Goh; Pierce K H Chow; Yu-Meng Tan; Peng-Chung Cheow; Yaw-Fui A Chung; Khee-Chee Soo; Wai-Keong Wong; London L P J Ooi
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 1.872

7.  Impact of the introduction of laparoscopic wedge resection as a surgical option for suspected small/medium-sized gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach on perioperative and oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Brian K P Goh; Pierce K H Chow; Aik-Yong Chok; Weng-Hoong Chan; Yaw-Fui A Chung; Hock-Soo Ong; Wai-Keong Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors.

Authors:  M Gagner; A Pomp; M F Herrera
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Fabio Sbrana; Francesco Maria Bianco; Enrique Fernando Elli; Galaxy Shah; Pietro Addeo; Giuseppe Caravaglios; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Revisiting vascular patency after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels.

Authors:  Ho Kyoung Hwang; Young Eun Chung; Kyoung Ah Kim; Chang Moo Kang; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Surgical resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm by minimally invasive surgery-the robotic approach?

Authors:  Roxanne Y A Teo; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-02

2.  First experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Singapore.

Authors:  Tze-Yi Low; Ye-Xin Koh; Brian Kp Goh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 1.858

3.  Early experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery in Singapore: single-institution experience with 20 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Brian Kp Goh; Ser-Yee Lee; Chung-Yip Chan; Jen-San Wong; Peng-Chung Cheow; Alexander Yf Chung; London Lpj Ooi
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  Initial experience with minimally invasive extended pancreatectomies for locally advanced pancreatic malignancies: Report of six cases.

Authors:  Tze-Yi Low; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Comparative Efficacy of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single-Center Comparative Study.

Authors:  Peng Chen; Bin Zhou; Tao Wang; Xiao Hu; Yongqiang Ye; Weidong Guo
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.682

6.  Evolution of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies at a single institution.

Authors:  Brian K P Goh; Ser-Yee Lee; Juinn-Huar Kam; Hui Ling Soh; Peng-Chung Cheow; Pierce K H Chow; London L P J Ooi; Alexander Y F Chung; Chung-Yip Chan
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  Minimally-invasive versus open enucleation for pancreatic tumours: A propensity-score adjusted analysis.

Authors:  Tousif Kabir; Zoe Z X Tan; Nicholas Syn; Alexander Y F Chung; London L P J Ooi; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2019-08-30

8.  Short- and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open spleen-saving distal pancreatectomies.

Authors:  Madeline Chee; Chuan-Yaw Lee; Ser-Yee Lee; London L P J Ooi; Alexander Y F Chung; Chung-Yip Chan; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.