Literature DB >> 26805587

"Alert and Oriented × 3?" Correlates of Mini-Cog Performance in a Post/Nondelirious Intensive Care Unit Sample.

Mark W Ketterer1, Yathreb Alaali2, Lenar Yessayan2, Jeff Jennings2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment has been found to be a predictor of adverse medical outcomes, including nonadherence, recurrent medical crises resulting in early readmissions, and death.
OBJECTIVE: The Mini-Cog has been proposed for bedside/clinic cognitive testing. Its validity as a measure of central nervous system (CNS) impairment has never been tested against measures of CNS-medical history, CNS scans, selected laboratory findings, observed in-hospital nondelirious memory impairment, or collateral history from family.
METHODS: We observed Mini-Cog performance in 107 post/nondelirious medical intensive care unit patients and tested its association with age, CNS-medical history, CNS scans, selected laboratory findings, and behavioral history (in-hospital observation of memory problems and collateral history from family or significant others).
RESULTS: The overall Mini-Cog covaried with age, various measures of CNS impairment, abnormal laboratory findings, and measures of preadmission "forgetfulness" per family and by in-hospital staff observation. Unique variance in predicting overall Mini-Cog scores included age, positive CNS scan, and behavioral history. Of 91 patients found to be "alert and oriented × 3," 76% were impaired in immediate memory, short-term memory, or clock drawing.
CONCLUSIONS: The Mini-Cog appears to be a brief, yet valid, measure of CNS dysfunction that significantly enhances sensitivity of evaluation at the bedside. Failure to evaluate patients with a formal examination like the Mini-Cog appears to miss up to 76% of patients with moderate cognitive impairment.
Copyright © 2016 The Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26805587     DOI: 10.1016/j.psym.2015.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosomatics        ISSN: 0033-3182            Impact factor:   2.386


  1 in total

1.  Feasibility of a web-based neurocognitive battery for assessing cognitive function in critical illness survivors.

Authors:  Kimia Honarmand; Sabhyata Malik; Conor Wild; Laura E Gonzalez-Lara; Christopher W McIntyre; Adrian M Owen; Marat Slessarev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.