| Literature DB >> 26805562 |
Carol A Mathews1, Soo Uhm2, Joanne Chan3, Michael Gause3, John Franklin3, Julian Plumadore3, Sandra J Stark3, Wendy Yu3, Ofilio Vigil2, Mark Salazar3, Kevin L Delucchi2, Eduardo Vega3.
Abstract
Hoarding Disorder (HD) is associated with substantial distress, impairment, and individual and societal costs. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) tailored to HD is the best-studied form of treatment and can be led by mental health professionals or by non-professionals (peers) with specific training. No previous study has directly compared outcomes for therapist-led and peer-led groups, and none have examined the effectiveness of these groups in a real-world setting. We used retrospective data to compare psychologist-led CBT groups (G-CBT) to groups led by peer facilitators using the Buried in Treasures workbooks (G-BiT) in individuals who sought treatment for HD from the Mental Health Association of San Francisco. The primary outcome was change in Hoarding Severity Scale scores. Approximate costs per participant were also examined. Both G-CBT and G-BiT showed improvement consistent with previous reports (22% improvement overall). After controlling for baseline group characteristics, there were no significant differences in outcomes between G-CBT and G-BiT. For G-CBT, where additional outcome data were available, functional impairment and severity of hoarding symptoms improved to a similar degree as compared to previous G-CBT studies, while hoarding-related cognition improved to a lesser degree (also consistent with previous studies). G-BiT cost approximately $100 less per participant than did G-CBT.Entities:
Keywords: Cognitive behavioral therapy; Outcome; Peer facilitation; Support group
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26805562 PMCID: PMC6020681 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychiatry Res ISSN: 0165-1781 Impact factor: 3.222