Jos Bloemers1,2, Kim van Rooij1,2, Leo de Leede3, Henderik W Frijlink4, Hans P F Koppeschaar1, Berend Olivier2,5, Adriaan Tuiten1,6. 1. Emotional Brain B.V., Almere. 2. Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences and Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht University, Utrecht. 3. Exelion Bio-Pharmaceutical Consultancy B.V., Waddinxveen. 4. Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 6. Department of Psychopharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
AIM: The aim was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of two formulations of a combination drug product containing 0.5 mg testosterone and 50 mg sildenafil for female sexual interest/arousal disorder. The prototype (formulation 1) consists of a testosterone solution for sublingual administration and a sildenafil tablet that is administered 2.5 h later. The dual route/dual release fixed dose combination tablet (formulation 2) employs a sublingual and an oral route for systemic uptake. This tablet has an inner core of sildenafil with a polymeric time delay coating and an outer polymeric coating containing testosterone. It was designed to increase dosing practicality and decrease potential temporal non-adherence through circumventing the relatively complex temporal dosing scheme. METHODS: Twelve healthy premenopausal subjects received both formulations randomly on separate days. Blood was sampled frequently to determine the pharmacokinetics of free testosterone, total testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, sildenafil and N-desmethyl-sildenafil. RESULTS: Formulation 2 had a higher maximum concentration (Cmax ) for testosterone, 8.06 ng ml(-1) (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.84, 9.28) and higher area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), 7.69 ng ml(-1) h (95% CI 6.22, 9.16) than formulation 1, 5.66 ng ml(-1) (95% CI 4.63, 6.69) and 5.12 ng ml(-1) h (95% CI 4.51, 5.73), respectively. Formulation 2 had a lower Cmax for sildenafil, 173 ng ml(-1) (95% CI 126, 220) and a lower AUC, 476 ng ml(-1) h (95% CI 401, 551) than formulation 1, 268 ng ml(-1) (95% CI 188, 348) and 577 ng ml(-1) h (95% CI 462, 692), respectively. Formulation 2 released sildenafil after 2.75 h (95% CI 2.40, 3.10). CONCLUSIONS: The dual route/dual release fixed dose combination tablet fulfilled its design criteria and is considered suitable for further clinical testing. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Female sexual interest/arousal disorder (FSIAD) is a significant problem impacting psychological well-being, but the pharmacotherapeutic options for this problem are lacking. The combined, on-demand, sublingual administration of low dose sublingual testosterone and oral administration of sildenafil is a novel pharmacotherapeutic option under development for FSIAD. In proof-of-concept trials, these compounds were successfully administered via different dosage forms (sublingual and oral) at different time points (separated by 2.5 h) because of their markedly different pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profiles. For future larger scale studies and the clinical practice, this raises obvious adherence issues. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: A newly developed dual route/dual release fixed dose combination tablet containing testosterone and sildenafil mimics the pharmacokinetic profile of these components when they are administered as different dosage forms, 2.5 h apart. This combination tablet is a suitable final pharmaceutical drug product that will be used in future studies.
AIM: The aim was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of two formulations of a combination drug product containing 0.5 mg testosterone and 50 mg sildenafil for female sexual interest/arousal disorder. The prototype (formulation 1) consists of a testosterone solution for sublingual administration and a sildenafil tablet that is administered 2.5 h later. The dual route/dual release fixed dose combination tablet (formulation 2) employs a sublingual and an oral route for systemic uptake. This tablet has an inner core of sildenafil with a polymeric time delay coating and an outer polymeric coating containing testosterone. It was designed to increase dosing practicality and decrease potential temporal non-adherence through circumventing the relatively complex temporal dosing scheme. METHODS: Twelve healthy premenopausal subjects received both formulations randomly on separate days. Blood was sampled frequently to determine the pharmacokinetics of free testosterone, total testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, sildenafil and N-desmethyl-sildenafil. RESULTS: Formulation 2 had a higher maximum concentration (Cmax ) for testosterone, 8.06 ng ml(-1) (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.84, 9.28) and higher area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), 7.69 ng ml(-1) h (95% CI 6.22, 9.16) than formulation 1, 5.66 ng ml(-1) (95% CI 4.63, 6.69) and 5.12 ng ml(-1) h (95% CI 4.51, 5.73), respectively. Formulation 2 had a lower Cmax for sildenafil, 173 ng ml(-1) (95% CI 126, 220) and a lower AUC, 476 ng ml(-1) h (95% CI 401, 551) than formulation 1, 268 ng ml(-1) (95% CI 188, 348) and 577 ng ml(-1) h (95% CI 462, 692), respectively. Formulation 2 released sildenafil after 2.75 h (95% CI 2.40, 3.10). CONCLUSIONS: The dual route/dual release fixed dose combination tablet fulfilled its design criteria and is considered suitable for further clinical testing. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Female sexual interest/arousal disorder (FSIAD) is a significant problem impacting psychological well-being, but the pharmacotherapeutic options for this problem are lacking. The combined, on-demand, sublingual administration of low dose sublingual testosterone and oral administration of sildenafil is a novel pharmacotherapeutic option under development for FSIAD. In proof-of-concept trials, these compounds were successfully administered via different dosage forms (sublingual and oral) at different time points (separated by 2.5 h) because of their markedly different pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profiles. For future larger scale studies and the clinical practice, this raises obvious adherence issues. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: A newly developed dual route/dual release fixed dose combination tablet containing testosterone and sildenafil mimics the pharmacokinetic profile of these components when they are administered as different dosage forms, 2.5 h apart. This combination tablet is a suitable final pharmaceutical drug product that will be used in future studies.
Authors: Peter A Bos; Jack van Honk; Nick F Ramsey; Dan J Stein; Erno J Hermans Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2012-09-20 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Jeroen Gerritsen; Flip Van Der Made; Jos Bloemers; Diana Van Ham; Gunilla Kleiverda; Walter Everaerd; Berend Olivier; Roy Levin; Adriaan Tuiten Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2009-03-30 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Erno J Hermans; Peter Putman; Johanna M Baas; Nynke M Gecks; J Leon Kenemans; Jack van Honk Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2007-09-27 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Kim van Rooij; Saskia Poels; Jos Bloemers; Irwin Goldstein; Jeroen Gerritsen; Diana van Ham; Frederiek van Mameren; Meredith Chivers; Walter Everaerd; Hans Koppeschaar; Berend Olivier; Adriaan Tuiten Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Jos Bloemers; Kim van Rooij; Leo de Leede; Henderik W Frijlink; Hans P F Koppeschaar; Berend Olivier; Adriaan Tuiten Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Adriaan Tuiten; Frits Michiels; Koen Be Böcker; Daniël Höhle; Jack van Honk; Robert Pj de Lange; Kim van Rooij; Rob Kessels; Jos Bloemers; Jeroen Gerritsen; Paddy Janssen; Leo de Leede; John-Jules Meyer; Walter Everaerd; Henderik W Frijlink; Hans Pf Koppeschaar; Berend Olivier; James G Pfaus Journal: Womens Health (Lond) Date: 2018 Jan-Dec
Authors: Jeroen Gerritsen; Jos Bloemers; Kim van Rooij; Leo de Leede; Ronald van der Geest; Henderik W Frijlink; Hans P F Koppeschaar; Berend Olivier; Adriaan Tuiten Journal: Sex Med Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 2.491