Literature DB >> 26803828

Introduction to special section on patient-reported outcomes in nonstandard settings.

Carolyn E Schwartz1,2, Dennis A Revicki3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID： 26803828     DOI： 10.1007/s11136-016-1228-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN： 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Internet option in a mail survey: more harm than good?

Authors:  Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Timothy J Beebe; Enrique Rey; Cathy Schleck; G Richard Locke; Nicholas J Talley
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 2.  Mode of administration does not cause bias in patient-reported outcome results: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Rutherford; Daniel Costa; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Holly Rice; Liam Gabb; Madeleine King
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Ambulatory and diary methods can facilitate the measurement of patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Evaluating a new methodology for providing individualized feedback in healthcare on quality of life and its importance, using the WHOQOL-BREF in a community population.

Authors:  Alison M Llewellyn; Suzanne M Skevington
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Evaluation of point-of-care PRO assessment in clinic settings: integration, parallel-forms reliability, and patient acceptability of electronic QOL measures during clinic visits.

Authors:  Pranav Sharma; Rodney L Dunn; John T Wei; James E Montie; Scott M Gilbert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Evaluation of pedometry as a patient-centered outcome in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT): a comparison of pedometry and patient reports of symptoms, health, and quality of life.

Authors:  Antonia V Bennett; Bryce B Reeve; Ethan M Basch; Sandra A Mitchell; Mathew Meeneghan; Claudio L Battaglini; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Brett Phillips; Thomas C Shea; William A Wood
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Implementation of the Kids-CAT in clinical settings: a newly developed computer-adaptive test to facilitate the assessment of patient-reported outcomes of children and adolescents in clinical practice in Germany.

Authors:  D Barthel; K I Fischer; S Nolte; C Otto; A-K Meyrose; S Reisinger; M Dabs; U Thyen; M Klein; H Muehlan; T Ankermann; O Walter; M Rose; U Ravens-Sieberer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Advantages and psychometric validation of proximal intensive assessments of patient-reported outcomes collected in daily life.

Authors:  Eve B Carlson; Nigel P Field; Josef I Ruzek; Richard A Bryant; Constance J Dalenberg; Terrence M Keane; David A Spain
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Evaluating PROMIS® instruments and methods for patient-centered outcomes research: Patient and provider voices in a substance use treatment setting.

Authors:  Kelly L Johnston; Suzanne M Lawrence; Nathan E Dodds; Lan Yu; Dennis C Daley; Paul A Pilkonis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Patients' and health professionals' understanding of and preferences for graphical presentation styles for individual-level EORTC QLQ-C30 scores.

Authors:  W Kuijpers; J M Giesinger; A Zabernigg; T Young; E Friend; I M Tomaszewska; N K Aaronson; B Holzner
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.147
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.