| Literature DB >> 26803744 |
Muhammad Izani Aznan1, Omaid Hayat Khan2, Allah Obhayo Unar1, Sharifah Emilia Tuan Sharif3, Amer Hayat Khan2, Syed Hassan Syed Abd Aziz1, Andee Dzulkarnaen Zakaria4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Honey has long been used for the treatment of number of ailments and diseases including surgical wounds. Current study evaluates the effectiveness of Tualang honey (TH) for large bowel anastomotic healing in Wistar rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26803744 PMCID: PMC4724403 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1003-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Histological grading scale [22]
| Grade | Histologic analysis |
|---|---|
| 0 | No evidence |
| 1+ | Occasional evidence |
| 2+ | Light scattering |
| 3+ | Abundant evidence |
| 4+ | Confluence cells or fibres |
Results of manometric studies among the two studied groups
| Mean (SD) | Mean Difference (95 % CI) | t-statistics (df)* |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control ( | Oral Tualang Honey ( | ||||
| Tensile Strength | 187.33 (16.24) | 241.33 (17.27) | -54.00 (-66.54, -41.56) | -8.82 (28) | <0.001 |
| Histology Test: Histopathological grading among the two groups at day 7 after colonic anastomosis according to Ehrlich-Hunt numerical scale [ | |||||
| Fibroblast count | 1.93 (0.46) | 2.87 (0.35) | -0.93 (-1.24, -0.63) | -6.26 (28) | <0.001 |
| Inflammatory cells | 2.87 (0.52) | 2.27 (0.46) | -0.60 (-0.97, -0.24) | -3.37 (28) | 0.002 |
| Neovascularization | 1.73 (0.59) | 1.8 (0.86) | -0.07 (-0.62, 0.49) | -0.25 (28) | 0.807 |
* Independent t test
Fig. 1Comparison of bursting pressure (tensile strength) between groups treated with TH and control group
Fig. 2Lack of fibroblast count and abundance of inflammatory cells infiltration in control group [black arrows], H&E stain, X20(a), digitally zoomed 2× (b) (Courtesy of Pathology Department, HUSM)
Fig. 3An increased fibroblast [black arrow] and less inflammatory cells infiltration in the TH group, H&E stain, X40 (Courtesy of Pathology Department, HUSM)