Robert W McGarrah1, Damian M Craig2, Carol Haynes2, Z Elaine Dowdy2, Svati H Shah3, William E Kraus4. 1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: robert.mcgarrah@dm.duke.edu. 2. Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA. 4. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent failures of HDL cholesterol (HDL-C)-raising therapies to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD) events have tempered the interest in the role of HDL-C in clinical risk assessment. Emerging data suggest that the atheroprotective properties of HDL depend on specific HDL particle characteristics not reflected by HDL-C. The purpose of this study was to determine the association of HDL particle concentration (HDL-P) and HDL subclasses with mortality in a high-risk cardiovascular population and to examine the clinical utility of these parameters in mortality risk discrimination and reclassification models. METHODS: Using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, we measured HDL-P and HDL subclasses in 3972 individuals enrolled in the CATHGEN coronary catheterization biorepository; tested for association with all-cause mortality in robust clinical models; and examined the utility of HDL subclasses in incremental mortality risk discrimination and reclassification. RESULTS: Over an average follow-up of eight years, 29.6% of the individuals died. In a multivariable model adjusted for ten CVD risk factors, HDL-P [HR, 0.71 (0.67-0.76), p = 1.3e-24] had a stronger inverse association with mortality than did HDL-C [HR 0.93 (0.87-0.99), p = 0.02]. Larger HDL size conferred greater risk and the sum of medium- and small-size HDL particles (MS-HDL-P) conferred less risk. Furthermore, the strong inverse relation of HDL-P levels with mortality was accounted for entirely by MS-HDL-P; HDL-C was not associated with mortality after adjustment for MS-HDL-P. Addition of MS-HDL-P to the GRACE Risk Score significantly improved risk discrimination and risk reclassification. CONCLUSION: HDL-P and smaller HDL subclasses were independent markers of residual mortality risk and incremental to HDL-C in a high-risk CVD population. These measures should be considered in risk stratification and future development of HDL-targeted therapies in high-risk populations.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent failures of HDL cholesterol (HDL-C)-raising therapies to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD) events have tempered the interest in the role of HDL-C in clinical risk assessment. Emerging data suggest that the atheroprotective properties of HDL depend on specific HDL particle characteristics not reflected by HDL-C. The purpose of this study was to determine the association of HDL particle concentration (HDL-P) and HDL subclasses with mortality in a high-risk cardiovascular population and to examine the clinical utility of these parameters in mortality risk discrimination and reclassification models. METHODS: Using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, we measured HDL-P and HDL subclasses in 3972 individuals enrolled in the CATHGEN coronary catheterization biorepository; tested for association with all-cause mortality in robust clinical models; and examined the utility of HDL subclasses in incremental mortality risk discrimination and reclassification. RESULTS: Over an average follow-up of eight years, 29.6% of the individuals died. In a multivariable model adjusted for ten CVD risk factors, HDL-P [HR, 0.71 (0.67-0.76), p = 1.3e-24] had a stronger inverse association with mortality than did HDL-C [HR 0.93 (0.87-0.99), p = 0.02]. Larger HDL size conferred greater risk and the sum of medium- and small-size HDL particles (MS-HDL-P) conferred less risk. Furthermore, the strong inverse relation of HDL-P levels with mortality was accounted for entirely by MS-HDL-P; HDL-C was not associated with mortality after adjustment for MS-HDL-P. Addition of MS-HDL-P to the GRACE Risk Score significantly improved risk discrimination and risk reclassification. CONCLUSION: HDL-P and smaller HDL subclasses were independent markers of residual mortality risk and incremental to HDL-C in a high-risk CVD population. These measures should be considered in risk stratification and future development of HDL-targeted therapies in high-risk populations.
Authors: Rachel H Mackey; Philip Greenland; David C Goff; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Christopher T Sibley; Samia Mora Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Anand Rohatgi; Amit Khera; Jarett D Berry; Edward G Givens; Colby R Ayers; Kyle E Wedin; Ian J Neeland; Ivan S Yuhanna; Daniel R Rader; James A de Lemos; Philip W Shaul Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William E Boden; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Todd Anderson; Bernard R Chaitman; Patrice Desvignes-Nickens; Kent Koprowicz; Ruth McBride; Koon Teo; William Weintraub Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stephen J Nicholls; H Bryan Brewer; John J P Kastelein; Kathryn A Krueger; Ming-Dauh Wang; Mingyuan Shao; Bo Hu; Ellen McErlean; Steven E Nissen Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-11-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Rachel H Mackey; Samia Mora; Alain G Bertoni; Christina L Wassel; Mercedes R Carnethon; Christopher T Sibley; David C Goff Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: James D Otvos; John R Guyton; Margery A Connelly; Sydney Akapame; Vera Bittner; Steven L Kopecky; Megan Lacy; Santica M Marcovina; Joseph B Muhlestein; William E Boden Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 4.766
Authors: Robert W McGarrah; Jacob P Kelly; Damian M Craig; Carol Haynes; Ryan C Jessee; Kim M Huffman; William E Kraus; Svati H Shah Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Robert W McGarrah; Scott B Crown; Guo-Fang Zhang; Svati H Shah; Christopher B Newgard Journal: Circ Res Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: L Liu; M Han; R Qie; Q Li; X Zhang; J Zhang; S Zhan; L Zhang; Z Xu; C Zhang; F Hong Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2021-10-21 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Daniel Seung Kim; Yatong K Li; Griffith A Bell; Amber A Burt; Tomas Vaisar; Patrick M Hutchins; Clement E Furlong; James D Otvos; Joseph F Polak; Martinson Kweku Arnan; Joel D Kaufman; Robyn L McClelland; W T Longstreth; Gail P Jarvik Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 5.501