Hong-Gang Wang1, Wandi Zhu2, Ronald J Kanter3, Jonathan R Silva2, Christina Honeywell4, Robert M Gow4, Geoffrey S Pitt5. 1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States; Ion Channel Research Unit, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, United States. 3. Division of Cardiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL, United States. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada. 5. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States; Ion Channel Research Unit, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: geoffrey.pitt@duke.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inherited autosomal dominant mutations in cardiac sodium channels (NaV1.5) cause various arrhythmias, such as long QT syndrome and Brugada syndrome. Although dozens of mutations throughout the protein have been reported, there are few reported mutations within a voltage sensor S4 transmembrane segment and few that are homozygous. Here we report analysis of a novel lidocaine-sensitive recessive mutation, p.R1309H, in the NaV1.5 DIII/S4 voltage sensor in a patient with a complex arrhythmia syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: We expressed the wild type or mutant NaV1.5 heterologously for analysis with the patch-clamp and voltage clamp fluorometry (VCF) techniques. p.R1309H depolarized the voltage-dependence of activation, hyperpolarized the voltage-dependence of inactivation, and slowed recovery from inactivation, thereby reducing the channel availability at physiologic membrane potentials. Additionally, p.R1309H increased the "late" Na(+) current. The location of the mutation in DIIIS4 prompted testing for a gating pore current. We observed an inward current at hyperpolarizing voltages that likely exacerbates the loss-of-function defects at resting membrane potentials. Lidocaine reduced the gating pore current. CONCLUSIONS: The p.R1309H homozygous NaV1.5 mutation conferred both gain-of-function and loss-of-function effects on NaV1.5 channel activity. Reduction of a mutation-induced gating pore current by lidocaine suggested a therapeutic mechanism.
BACKGROUND: Inherited autosomal dominant mutations in cardiac sodium channels (NaV1.5) cause various arrhythmias, such as long QT syndrome and Brugada syndrome. Although dozens of mutations throughout the protein have been reported, there are few reported mutations within a voltage sensor S4 transmembrane segment and few that are homozygous. Here we report analysis of a novel lidocaine-sensitive recessive mutation, p.R1309H, in the NaV1.5 DIII/S4 voltage sensor in a patient with a complex arrhythmia syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: We expressed the wild type or mutant NaV1.5 heterologously for analysis with the patch-clamp and voltage clamp fluorometry (VCF) techniques. p.R1309H depolarized the voltage-dependence of activation, hyperpolarized the voltage-dependence of inactivation, and slowed recovery from inactivation, thereby reducing the channel availability at physiologic membrane potentials. Additionally, p.R1309H increased the "late" Na(+) current. The location of the mutation in DIIIS4 prompted testing for a gating pore current. We observed an inward current at hyperpolarizing voltages that likely exacerbates the loss-of-function defects at resting membrane potentials. Lidocaine reduced the gating pore current. CONCLUSIONS: The p.R1309H homozygous NaV1.5 mutation conferred both gain-of-function and loss-of-function effects on NaV1.5 channel activity. Reduction of a mutation-induced gating pore current by lidocaine suggested a therapeutic mechanism.
Authors: Connie R Bezzina; Martin B Rook; W Antoinette Groenewegen; Lucas J Herfst; Allard C van der Wal; Jan Lam; Habo J Jongsma; Arthur A M Wilde; Marcel M A M Mannens Journal: Circ Res Date: 2003-02-07 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: M Noda; S Shimizu; T Tanabe; T Takai; T Kayano; T Ikeda; H Takahashi; H Nakayama; Y Kanaoka; N Minamino Journal: Nature Date: 1984 Nov 8-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Zoltan Varga; Wandi Zhu; Angela R Schubert; Jennifer L Pardieck; Arie Krumholz; Eric J Hsu; Mark A Zaydman; Jianmin Cui; Jonathan R Silva Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2015-08-17
Authors: William P McNair; Lisa Ku; Matthew R G Taylor; Pam R Fain; Dmi Dao; Eugene Wolfel; Luisa Mestroni Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-10-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Elisa Passini; Oliver J Britton; Hua Rong Lu; Jutta Rohrbacher; An N Hermans; David J Gallacher; Robert J H Greig; Alfonso Bueno-Orovio; Blanca Rodriguez Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Michelle M Monasky; Emanuele Micaglio; Giuseppe Ciconte; Sara Benedetti; Chiara Di Resta; Gabriele Vicedomini; Valeria Borrelli; Andrea Ghiroldi; Marco Piccoli; Luigi Anastasia; Vincenzo Santinelli; Maurizio Ferrari; Carlo Pappone Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Wandi Zhu; Taylor L Voelker; Zoltan Varga; Angela R Schubert; Jeanne M Nerbonne; Jonathan R Silva Journal: J Gen Physiol Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 4.086