Literature DB >> 2553292

Blockade of cardiac sodium channels by lidocaine. Single-channel analysis.

A O Grant1, M A Dietz, F R Gilliam, C F Starmer.   

Abstract

The mechanism of interaction of lidocaine with cardiac sodium channels during use-dependent block is not well defined. We examined the blockade of single cardiac sodium channels by lidocaine and its hydrophobic derivative RAD-242 in rabbit ventricular myocytes. Experiments were performed in cell-attached and inside-out patches. Use-dependent block was assessed with trains of ten 200-msec pulses with interpulse intervals of 500 msec and test potentials of -60 to -40 mV. Single-channel kinetics sometimes showed time-dependent change in the absence of drug. During exposure to 80 microM lidocaine, use-dependent block during the trains was associated with a decrease in the average number of openings per step. At -60 mV, mean open time was not significantly changed (control, 1.4 +/- 0.6 msec; lidocaine, 1.2 +/- 0.3 msec, p greater than 0.05). Greater block developed during trains of 200-msec pulses compared with trains of 20-msec pulses at the same interpulse interval at test potentials during which openings were uncommon later than 20 msec (-50 and -40 mV). Prolonged bursts of channels showing slow-gating kinetics were observed both in control and the presence of 80 microM lidocaine. However, lidocaine may decrease the late sodium current by altering the kinetics of slow gating. The hydrophobic lidocaine derivative RAD-242, which has a 10-fold greater lipid solubility than lidocaine, decreased the peak averaged current during pulse train stimulation by 60% without a change in the mean open time. Our results suggest that the major effect of lidocaine during use-dependent block involves the interaction with a nonconducting state of the sodium channel followed by a failure to open during subsequent depolarization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2553292     DOI: 10.1161/01.res.65.5.1247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Res        ISSN: 0009-7330            Impact factor:   17.367


  27 in total

1.  Blockade of cardiac sodium channels. Competition between the permeant ion and antiarrhythmic drugs.

Authors:  M J Barber; D J Wendt; C F Starmer; A O Grant
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Rate-dependent activation failure in isolated cardiac cells and tissue due to Na+ channel block.

Authors:  Anthony Varghese; Anthony J Spindler; David Paterson; Denis Noble
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Na+ channel blockade by cyclic AMP and other 6-aminopurines in neonatal rat heart.

Authors:  J W Herzig; M Kohlhardt
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  Lidocaine induces a slow inactivated state in rat skeletal muscle sodium channels.

Authors:  Z Chen; B H Ong; N G Kambouris; E Marbán; G F Tomaselli; J R Balser
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Block of wild-type and inactivation-deficient cardiac sodium channels IFM/QQQ stably expressed in mammalian cells.

Authors:  A O Grant; R Chandra; C Keller; M Carboni; C F Starmer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Sodium channel molecular conformations and antiarrhythmic drug affinity.

Authors:  Michael F Sheets; Harry A Fozzard; Gregory M Lipkind; Dorothy A Hanck
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.677

7.  Block of voltage-dependent sodium currents by the substance P receptor antagonist (+/-)-CP-96,345 in neurones cultured from rat cortex.

Authors:  M Caeser; G R Seabrook; J A Kemp
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Direct quantification of apparent binding indices from quinidine-induced in vivo conduction delay in canine myocardium.

Authors:  F N Haugland; S B Johnson; D L Packer
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 9.  Computational approaches to understand cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias.

Authors:  Byron N Roberts; Pei-Chi Yang; Steven B Behrens; Jonathan D Moreno; Colleen E Clancy
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.733

10.  Responsiveness of cardiac Na+ channels to antiarrhythmic drugs: the role of inactivation.

Authors:  I Benz; M Kohlhardt
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.