Literature DB >> 26801234

Double-Blind Comparison of Ultrasonic and Conventional Osteotomy in Terms of Early Postoperative Edema and Ecchymosis.

A Emre Ilhan1, Betul Cengiz1, Basak Caypinar Eser1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Edema and ecchymosis are common complications of rhinoplasty. Modifications to osteotomy may reduce edema and ecchymosis and ameliorate postoperative discomfort in patients who undergo rhinoplasty.
OBJECTIVES: The authors performed osteotomy with conventional instruments or with an ultrasonic device and compared these methods with respect to the severities of ecchymosis and edema in the early postoperative period.
METHODS: Fifty-six patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty with medial oblique, low-to-high internal osteotomy performed conventionally or with an ultrasonic device were evaluated in a prospective study. Photographs of the patients on postoperative days 3 and 7 were scored for ecchymosis and edema by 2 physicians who did not perform the operations and were blinded to the osteotomy procedure.
RESULTS: Ecchymosis scores on postoperative days 3 and 7 and edema scores on postoperative day 3 were significantly higher for the 22 patients who underwent conventional osteotomy than for the 34 patients who underwent ultrasonic osteotomy, as scored by both examiners. Edema scores on postoperative day 7 were significantly higher for conventional than for ultrasonic osteotomy as assessed by 1 examiner but were not significantly different as determined by the other examiner.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this comparative study suggest that rhinoplasty with ultrasonic osteotomy is associated with less edema and ecchymosis in the early postoperative period than is rhinoplasty with conventional osteotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Therapeutic.
© 2016 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26801234     DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjv260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J        ISSN: 1090-820X            Impact factor:   4.283


  8 in total

1.  A comparison of piezosurgery with conventional techniques for internal osteotomy.

Authors:  I Koçak; R Doğan; O Gökler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The comparison of edema and ecchymosis after piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Ümit Taşkın; Timur Batmaz; Mehmet Erdil; Salih Aydın; Kadir Yücebaş
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  [Advantages of piezoelectric technology in rhinoplasty].

Authors:  M San Nicoló; A Berghaus
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  A Comparison Between Piezosurgery and Conventional Osteotomies in Rhinoplasty on Post-Operative Oedema and Ecchymosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Janneta Kisel; Manaf Khatib; Naveen Cavale
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 5.  Modalities of Post-Rhinoplasty Edema and Ecchymosis Measurement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marc Levin; Hedyeh Ziai; Michael Roskies
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 0.558

6.  [Comparison of piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty : A systematic review].

Authors:  M Wähmann; F Riedel; M Kovacevic; A Hopf; A E Albers
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Comments on "Double-Blind Comparison of Ultrasonic and Conventional Osteotomy in Terms of Early Postoperative Edema and Ecchymosis".

Authors:  Can Alper Çagici
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 4.283

8.  Comparison of edema and ecchymosis in rhinoplasty candidates after lateral nasal osteotomy using piezosurgery and external osteotomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Ghavimi; Saeed Nezafati; Javad Yazdani; Tannaz Pourlak; Masoumeh Amini; Tala Pourlak; Arezu Ghoreishizadeh; Ramin Negahdari
Journal:  J Adv Pharm Technol Res       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.