OBJECTIVE: Based on the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM), the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) was developed to measure patients' perceptions of their chronic medical illness. Such a measure does not exist for dental conditions. This study describes psychometric properties of the IPQ-R for Dental (IPQ-RD) for parent/caregivers of children under 6 years of age. METHODS: Parent/caregivers (n=160) of children aged <6 years attending a pediatric dental clinic completed the IPQ-RD and a questionnaire assessing their socio-demographics, dental anxiety, oral health self-efficacy, and child's preventive dental visits. Dental charts were abstracted for child's decayed, missing, filled teeth (dmft) information. The 33-item IPQ-RD was tested for internal (construct, discriminant) and external validity (concurrent, convergent, discriminant) and reliability (internal consistency). RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the eight-factor model in accordance with the CSM framework (identity, consequences-child, consequences-caregiver, control-child, control-caregiver, timeline, illness coherence, emotional representations) had good construct validity based on significant factor loadings and acceptable to excellent model fit (RMSEA=0.078, CFI=0.951). Concurrent validity was demonstrated by significant negative correlations and higher mean factor scores for five constructs for children without dental visits indicating inaccurate caregiver perception of cavities. Discriminant validity was suggested by non-relationship with external measures (dental anxiety, self-efficacy). Internal consistency of six IPQ-RD constructs was excellent (Cronbach's alpha >0.74). CONCLUSION: The IPQ-RD is a valid and reliable measure to assess parent/caregivers' representation of young children's cavities with potential to be a valuable risk assessment tool for oral health behavioral research.
OBJECTIVE: Based on the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM), the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) was developed to measure patients' perceptions of their chronic medical illness. Such a measure does not exist for dental conditions. This study describes psychometric properties of the IPQ-R for Dental (IPQ-RD) for parent/caregivers of children under 6 years of age. METHODS: Parent/caregivers (n=160) of children aged <6 years attending a pediatric dental clinic completed the IPQ-RD and a questionnaire assessing their socio-demographics, dental anxiety, oral health self-efficacy, and child's preventive dental visits. Dental charts were abstracted for child's decayed, missing, filled teeth (dmft) information. The 33-item IPQ-RD was tested for internal (construct, discriminant) and external validity (concurrent, convergent, discriminant) and reliability (internal consistency). RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the eight-factor model in accordance with the CSM framework (identity, consequences-child, consequences-caregiver, control-child, control-caregiver, timeline, illness coherence, emotional representations) had good construct validity based on significant factor loadings and acceptable to excellent model fit (RMSEA=0.078, CFI=0.951). Concurrent validity was demonstrated by significant negative correlations and higher mean factor scores for five constructs for children without dental visits indicating inaccurate caregiver perception of cavities. Discriminant validity was suggested by non-relationship with external measures (dental anxiety, self-efficacy). Internal consistency of six IPQ-RD constructs was excellent (Cronbach's alpha >0.74). CONCLUSION: The IPQ-RD is a valid and reliable measure to assess parent/caregivers' representation of young children's cavities with potential to be a valuable risk assessment tool for oral health behavioral research.
Authors: Abdul-Razak Abubakari; Martyn C Jones; William Lauder; Alison Kirk; Devasenan Devendra; John Anderson Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2011-12-03 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: M J Davies; S Heller; T C Skinner; M J Campbell; M E Carey; S Cradock; H M Dallosso; H Daly; Y Doherty; S Eaton; C Fox; L Oliver; K Rantell; G Rayman; K Khunti Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-02-14
Authors: Sultan M Mosleh; Christine M Bond; Amanda J Lee; Alice Kiger; Neil C Campbell Journal: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 3.908
Authors: Anne Maguire; Jan E Clarkson; Gail Va Douglas; Vicky Ryan; Tara Homer; Zoe Marshman; Elaine McColl; Nina Wilson; Luke Vale; Mark Robertson; Alaa Abouhajar; Richard D Holmes; Ruth Freeman; Barbara Chadwick; Christopher Deery; Ferranti Wong; Nicola Pt Innes Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 4.014