Literature DB >> 26800299

The Effect of the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations on Mammography Rates.

Natallia Gray1, Gabriel Picone2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a change in U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) screening guidelines on mammography rates in the United States. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: In 2010, the year following the change in guidelines, 12-month mammography prevalence among women aged 40-49 years fell by 2.09 percentage points (95 percent confidence interval [CI]: -2.87 to -1.31) from 54.63 percent in 2008. For women aged 50-74 years, and aged 75 years and older, 12-month screening rates were 2.21 (95 percent CI: -2.65 to -1.77) and 3.60 (95 percent CI: -4.48 to -2.70) percentage points lower than those in 2008. In 2012, for women aged 40-49 years, 12-month prevalence fell to 52.51 percent, a decline of 2.12 percentage points (95 percent CI: -2.79 to -1.32) relative to screening rates prior the USPSTF announcement. For women aged 50-74 years and aged 75 years and older screening rates were 2.45 (95 percent CI: -2.96 to -2.07) and 5.71 (95 percent CI: -6.61 to -4.81) percentage points lower, respectively, in 2012 than in 2008.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates an immediate and lasting reduction in the rates of breast cancer screening among women of all age groups after the 2009 revision of screening guidelines by the USPSTF. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mammography; change in guidelines; screening prevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26800299      PMCID: PMC4946042          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  10 in total

1.  The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening.

Authors:  Linda B Squiers; Debra J Holden; Suzanne E Dolina; Annice E Kim; Carla M Bann; Jeanette M Renaud
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Mammography rates after the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening recommendation.

Authors:  David H Howard; E Kathleen Adams
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Longitudinal and cross-sectional sequences in the study of age and generation effects.

Authors:  P B Baltes
Journal:  Hum Dev       Date:  1968

4.  Mammography use after the 2009 debate.

Authors:  Nengliang Yao; Cathy J Bradley; Patricia Y Miranda
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Changes in U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations: effect on mammography screening in Olmsted County, MN 2004-2013.

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; Jon O Ebbert; Debra J Jacobson; Linda B Squiers; Chun Fan; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Véronique L Roger; Jennifer L St Sauver
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Mammography self-report and mammography claims: racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic discrepancies among elderly women.

Authors:  Kathleen Holt; Peter Franks; Sean Meldrum; Kevin Fiscella
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Mammography use among women ages 40-49 after the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.

Authors:  Lauren D Block; Marian P Jarlenski; Albert W Wu; Wendy L Bennett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Disparities in preventive procedures: comparisons of self-report and Medicare claims data.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Kathleen Holt; Sean Meldrum; Peter Franks
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Impact of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines on screening mammography rates on women in their 40s.

Authors:  Amy T Wang; Jiaquan Fan; Holly K Van Houten; Jon C Tilburt; Natasha K Stout; Victor M Montori; Nilay D Shah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Lack of Impact of the 2009 USPSTF Guidelines on Rates of Mammography Screening.

Authors:  Clare Brown; Adrienne Nevola; Bradley C Martin
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Hongyuan Gao; Melissa L Anderson; Tracy Onega; Susan Brandzel; Melissa A Rabelhofer; Susan Carol Bradford; Erin J Aiello Bowles
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Change in Breast Cancer Screening Intervals Since the 2009 USPSTF Guideline.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Robert F Arao; Rebecca A Hubbard; Brian L Sprague; Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Jennifer S Haas; Louise Henderson; Deidre Hill; Christoph I Lee; Anna N A Tosteson; Tracy Onega
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Examining Breast Cancer Screening Behavior Among Southern Black Women After the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force Mammography Guideline Revisions.

Authors:  Deeonna E Farr; Heather M Brandt; Swann Arp Adams; Venice E Haynes; Andrea S Gibson; Dawnyéa D Jackson; Kimberly C Rawlinson; John R Ureda; James R Hébert
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2020-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.