| Literature DB >> 26800189 |
Anna M Kauppi1, Alicia Edin1, Ingrid Ziegler2, Paula Mölling3, Anders Sjöstedt1, Åsa Gylfe1, Kristoffer Strålin4, Anders Johansson1.
Abstract
A metabolomics approach for prediction of bacteremic sepsis in patients in the emergency room (ER) was investigated. In a prospective study, whole blood samples from 65 patients with bacteremic sepsis and 49 ER controls were compared. The blood samples were analyzed using gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Multivariate and logistic regression modeling using metabolites identified by chromatography or using conventional laboratory parameters and clinical scores of infection were employed. A predictive model of bacteremic sepsis with 107 metabolites was developed and validated. The number of metabolites was reduced stepwise until identifying a set of 6 predictive metabolites. A 6-metabolite predictive logistic regression model showed a sensitivity of 0.91(95% CI 0.69-0.99) and a specificity 0.84 (95% CI 0.58-0.94) with an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.89-1.01). Myristic acid was the single most predictive metabolite, with a sensitivity of 1.00 (95% CI 0.85-1.00) and specificity of 0.95 (95% CI 0.74-0.99), and performed better than various combinations of conventional laboratory and clinical parameters. We found that a metabolomics approach for analysis of acute blood samples was useful for identification of patients with bacteremic sepsis. Metabolomics should be further evaluated as a new tool for infection diagnostics.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26800189 PMCID: PMC4723089 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147670
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics and clinical variables of patients.
| Work set | Test set | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable (no. analyzed) | 42 with bacteremic sepsis | 30 ER controls | 23 with bacteremic sepsis | 19 ER controls | |||
| Patient characteristics | |||||||
| Age in y (114) | 71 ± 17 | 68 ± 17 | 71 ± 14 | 67 ± 19 | .850 | ||
| Percent males (114) | 52 | 50 | 57 | 53 | .768 | ||
| No. with diabetes (113) | 8 | 4 | 3 | 5 | .999 | ||
| No. with cardiovascular disease (114) | 11 | 8 | 10 | 4 | .409 | ||
| No. with malignancy (111) | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | .255 | ||
| No. with COPD (110) | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 | .185 | ||
| Clinical parameters | |||||||
| Temperature in °C (108) | 39.0 ± 1.1 | 37.9 ± 0.7 | 38.6 ± 0.9 | 38 ± 1 | < .001 | ||
| Systolic blood pressure in mmHg (104) | 133 ± 29 | 142± 26 | 125 ± 29 | 143 ± 32 | .051 | ||
| Respiration rate per minute (91) | 23 ± 8 | 22 ± 7 | 26 ± 13 | 22 ± 6 | .690 | ||
| Percent with SIRS ≥ 2 (102) | 80 | 42 | 80 | 50 | < .001 | ||
| No. with severe sepsis (107)) | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0 | < .001 | ||
| No. dead within 30 days (112) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .398 | ||
| MEDS score | 3.2 ± 4.0 | 2.6 ± 2.2 | 4.7 ± 3.9 | 3.0 ± 2.9 | .083 | ||
| MEWS score (107) | 2.5 ± 3.9 | 2.0 ± 2.0 | 3.6 ± 2.7 | 2.4 ± 2.3 | < .001 | ||
| CRB-65 score (107) | 1.1 ± 0.9 | 0.8 ± 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.9 | 0.7 ± 0.6 | .064 | ||
| Charlson score (112) | 1.3 ± 1.3 | 1.5 ± 1.7 | 2.0 ± 1.9 | 1.5 ± 1.8 | .641 | ||
| Days in hospital (112) | 12 ± 14 | 4 ± 4 | 7 ± 6 | 4 ± 2 | .002 | ||
| Days in Intensive Care (112) | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | .134 | ||
| Clinical Chemistry | |||||||
| C-reactive protein in mg/L (114) | 175 ± 128 | 50. ± 54 | 157 ± 112 | 79 ± 74 | < .001 | ||
| Hemoglobin concentration in g/L (114) | 125 ± 16 | 132 ± 19 | 120 ± 14 | 130 ± 17 | .027 | ||
| White blood cell concentration ×109/L (114) | 14 ± 5 | 9 ± 4 | 16 ± 10 | 9 ± 3 | < .001 | ||
| Thrombocyte concentration ×109/L (114) | 222 ± 90 | 274 ± 91 | 245 ± 106 | 260 ± 83 | .023 | ||
| Creatinine in μmol/L (114) | 107 ± 45 | 78 ± 25 | 95 ± 49 | 93 ± 49 | .022 | ||
a Data are presented as mean with standard deviations.
b MEDS, mortality in emergency department sepsis; MEWS, modified early warning score; CRB-65, pneumonia severity score.
AUC and model performance for work set and test set.
| Performance variables | Six metabolites | 4 clinical variables | SIRS score | White blood cell count | C-reactive protein | Myristic acid | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (%) | 93.1 | 95.5 | 71.9 | 76.4 | 76.4 | 81.8 | |
| Sensitivity | 0.952 | 0.976 | 0.800 | 0.857 | 0.762 | 0.905 | |
| Specificity | 0.900 | 0.920 | 0.583 | 0.633 | 0.767 | 0.700 | |
| PPV | 0.930 | 0.953 | 0.762 | 0.766 | 0.821 | 0.809 | |
| NPV | 0.931 | 0.958 | 0.636 | 0.760 | 0.697 | 0.840 | |
| AUC | 0.979 | 0.967 | 0.692 | 0.820 | 0.842 | 0.855 | |
| Accuracy (%) | 88.1 | 70.7 | 65.8 | 69.0 | 64.3 | 97.6 | |
| Sensitivity | 0.913 | 0.826 | 0.800 | 0.652 | 0.739 | 1.000 | |
| Specificity | 0.842 | 0.556 | 0.500 | 0.737 | 0.526 | 0.947 | |
| PPV | 0.875 | 0.704 | 0.640 | 0.750 | 0.654 | 0.958 | |
| NPV | 0.889 | 0.714 | 0.692 | 0.636 | 0.625 | 1.000 | |
| AUC | 0.931 | 0.817 | 0.650 | 0.731 | 0.737 | 0.977 | |
a Model performances were calculated with Fischer’s exact test using 2x2 tables of predicted probabilities obtained via logistic regression.