Active and silent chromophore isoforms for phytochrome Pr photoisomerization: An alternative evolutionary strategy to optimize photoreaction quantum yields.

Photoisomerization of a protein bound chromophore is the basis of light sensing of many photoreceptors. We tracked Z-to-E photoisomerization of Cph1 phytochrome chromophore PCB in the Pr form in real-time. Two different phycocyanobilin (PCB) ground state geometries with different ring D orientations have been identified. The pre-twisted and hydrogen bonded PCB(a) geometry exhibits a time constant of 30 ps and a quantum yield of photoproduct formation of 29%, about six times slower and ten times higher than that for the non-hydrogen bonded PCB(b) geometry. This new mechanism of pre-twisting the chromophore by protein-cofactor interaction optimizes yields of slow photoreactions and provides a scaffold for photoreceptor engineering.

The photochemical event that initiates light detection in vision, triggering ion transport through membranes and negative phototaxis, is a cis-to-trans or trans-to-cis isomerization of the chromophore, which is part of a photoreceptor. The process is known to occur very quickly with time constant typically between 200 fs and 3 ps for rhodopsin and photoactive yellow protein, respectively. This very fast process is accompanied with a high photoreaction quantum yield typically above 40%, because alternative reaction pathways with slower time constants have a lower probability to occur. Photoisomerization dynamics observed for the photoreceptor phytochrome in its Pr form show longer time constants and a low quantum yield of about 12%, suggesting poor optimization by nature.

Phytochromes are a family of dimeric chromoproteins that absorb light by means of a bound bilin (or linear tetrapyrrole) chromophore, and regulate numerous photoresponses in plants, bacteria, and fungi. They sense red and far-red light by means of two relatively stable conformers: a red light absorbing Pr form with ZZZssa (C5-Z, C10-Z, C15-Z, C5-syn, C10-syn, C15-anti, Figure 1) chromophore geometry and a far-red light absorbing Pfr form with a ZZEssa chromophore conformation. By photointerconversion between active and inactive forms, phytochromes act as light-regulated master switches for measuring the fluence, direction, and color of the ambient light. Light absorption by the stable Pr conformer triggers an ultrafast Z-to-E isomerization (cis-to-trans) of the C15 = C16 methine bridge between the C and D rings of the bilin chromophore accompanied by rotation of ring D. The structural switch, initially localized at the bilin chromophore, is cascaded via intermolecular couplings to slower and widespread structural changes which finally lead to the Pfr form. The initial quantum yield determines the efficiency, of all successive reaction steps. Therefore, to design synthetic light sensing and light harvesting systems with optimized efficacy it is essential to determine the exact molecular reaction mechanism of ultrafast photoisomerization.

FIG. 1.

PCB chromophore of Cph1Δ2 phytochrome with ZZZssa (C5-Z, C10-Z, C15-Z, C5-syn, C10-syn, C15-anti) geometry. Absorption spectrum of Cph1Δ2 Pr form (black line) and applied excitation pulse profile (red line).

Unfortunately, only a few spectroscopic methods allow direct tracking of fast structural changes in biomolecules on a nanosecond time scale. From direct and indirect methods, it is known that the chromophore in photoreceptors such as rhodopsin, bacteriorhodopsin, and photoactive yellow protein isomerize around a C=C double bond on a time scale of 0.2 to 3 ps with yields of 40% to 65%, a reaction process much faster and five to ten times more efficient in the protein than in solution. The primary photoisomerization of the Pr phytochrome has been investigated by means of ultrafast electronic and vibrational spectroscopy of plant and bacterial phytochromes. From these studies, isomerization time constants in the range of 3 ps to 16 ps and 25 ps to 40 ps were reported, followed by lumi-R photoproduct formation with quantum yields in the range of 7% to 16%.

The low photoproduct quantum yield in phytochrome was proposed to result from photoreceptor heterogeneity. Different geometries of phycocyanobilin (PCB) chromophores in solution were reported with time constants in the range of 3 ps to 500 ps, not detectable in phytochrome Pr photoreaction. Despite the kinetic insight gained from these electronic and vibrational investigations, it was not possible to establish when the C15=C16 double bond isomerization and ring D rotation occur, let alone determine the influence of chromophore heterogeneity in phytochromes or the structural orientation of ring D in the photoproduct lumi-R. A nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) study by Song et al. reported two PCB geometries in the Pr ground state Pr-I and Pr-II with different ring D orientations but unknown photoreactive properties. Although traditional femtosecond time resolved infrared and Raman spectroscopic methods provide important information on structural dynamics, they are not able to track orientational changes of vibrational transition dipole moments (tdm) in real time directly.

In this study, we used polarization resolved femtosecond visible pump infrared probe (prfs VIS-IR) spectroscopy to determine the frequency position and orientation of the vibrational modes on a femtosecond time scale from excitation to formation of the first photoproduct lumi-R. Prfs VIS-IR spectroscopy provides direct transient information on the relative angle between the excited electronic transition dipole moment (tdm) and the probed vibrational tdm. The tdms are fixed within the molecular scaffold of the chromophore, and their properties depend on the electronically excited state. To solely obtain signals from the chromophore's ν(C=O) and ν(C=C) stretching vibrations, we used the phycocyanobilin (PCB) chromophore bound to 13C/15N labeled Cph1Δ2 protein in D2O, shifting all ν(C=O), ν(C=C), and ν(C=N) stretching vibrations of the protein to longer wavelengths and all significant protein vibrations out of our spectral window of 1660–1745 cm−1.

Our technique allows us to directly address and answer questions concerning the timing of the chromophore isomerization and ring D rotation, the heterogeneity of chromophore structures and their photoreaction quantum yields, the ZZZssa Pr and the ZZEssa lumi-R ground state geometry (with the help of calculated structures), and the low average quantum yield of the photoreaction compared to that of other photoreceptors. The direct marker bands for Z-to-E isomerization in the 1700 cm−1 spectral region were monitored by prfs VIS-IR spectroscopy at a spectral resolution of 1.5 cm−1 and a time resolution better than 400 fs, sufficient to resolve sample heterogeneities and dynamics on the time scale believed to govern the S1-S0 transition.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Structural changes initiated by the photoexcitation are reflected in changes in the chromophores' vibrational spectrum. Upon excitation, isotropic transient absorption signals Aiso were determined by the absorption signals with parallel A‖ and perpendicular A⊥ polarization, with respect to the pump pulse polarization according to Aiso = (A‖ + 2A⊥)/3. All transients were best fitted by a biexponential decay of (4.7 ± 1.4) ps and (30 ± 5) ps. The error margins represent 1σ standard deviations as determined by exhaustive search analysis (ExSeAn).

In Figure 2(a), the ground state recovery at 1631 cm−1 represents signals of the PCB delocalized mode comprising the C15 = C16 methine bridge and the C17 = C18 double bond of the D ring, superimposed with signals from 13C labeled carbonyl modes of the protein. Frequencies above 1670 cm−1 originate exclusively from chromophore ν(C=O) stretching vibrations. The decay of the ν(C19=O)* stretching vibration of ring D in the electronically excited state of Pr (Fig. 2(a)) has its maximum at 1680 cm−1 and is red-shifted with respect to its ground state absorption. The decay is dominated by the 30 ps time constant (80%). Two distinct bleaching signals of the ν(C19=O) stretching vibration in the Pr ground state, at 1701 cm−1 and 1708 cm−1, are presented in Figure 2(b). The ν(C19=Oa) bleaching signal at 1701 cm−1 has only a negligible 4.7 ps contribution of 5% (Fig. S3(b)), while the ν(C19=Ob) bleaching signal at 1708 cm−1 exhibits a pronounced 4.7 ps contribution of 30%. The bleaching recovery at 100 ps is more than seven times greater for ν(C19=Ob) than for ν(C19=Oa). Since the difference between the time constants of the two bleaching bands cannot originate from overlap with the ν(C19=O)* vibrational band of Pr, two distinct ν(C19=O) vibrations must exist, resulting from at least two different chromophore ground state geometries in Cph1Δ2. Additional support is given by the analysis of the perturbed free induction decay (PFID) signal. The exponential rise of the PFID signal is related to the Lorentzian line width of the absorption band as its Fourier transform. The optimal fit gives a dephasing time constant of τdep = 1620 fs with a 1σ error margin from 1350 fs to 2000 fs (Fig. S1). This translates to a Lorentzian line width range of 6 cm−1 to 8 cm−1. Given this line width the bleaching band at ∼1705 cm−1 in the decay associated spectrum (DAS) at time zero (Fig. 4) cannot be explained by a single absorption band, but can well be simulated with two absorption bands at 1701 cm−1 and 1708 cm−1. Exhaustive search analysis of the positions of the two absorption bands shows that their frequencies exhibit distinct values (Fig. S2). Analysis of the polarization resolved DAS (Fig. 4) provides relative angles between the vibrational transition dipole moments of these two vibrations with the electronic transition dipole moment (tdm) of the S0→S1 transition. We find distinct angles of 29° and 16° for ν(C19=O)a and ν(C19=O)b, respectively. The frequency position of the ν(C19=O) vibrational band of PCB was reported to be in the spectral region of 1696 cm−1 to 1707 cm−1. In previous studies, no direct indications for two ν(C19=O) vibrational bands had been reported. With our higher spectral resolution of 1.5 cm−1 and the time resolved spectroscopic method, we are able to assign two distinct vibrational bands located at 1701 cm−1 and 1708 cm−1, each having a width of 8 cm−1. Those frequency positions are known to result from the ν(C19=O) stretching vibration in the presence or absence of a hydrogen bond, respectively. However, hot ground states or hot electronic excited states would contribute as positive signals with the same relative angles as the ground state or electronic excited state, respectively. Hence, neither a hot ground state nor a hot electronic excited state contribution can account for the negative signal at 1701 cm−1 with a relative angle of 29°. Additionally, careful analysis of the data show that the second bleaching band signal at 1701 cm−1 cannot origin from overlapping of the electronic excited state signal and the ground state bleaching signal (Fig. S8).

FIG. 2.

Transient dynamics at frequency positions of marker bands calculated for isotropic conditions. (a) Bleaching signal of ν(C15 = C16) and ν(C17 = C18) stretching vibrations (open red circles), absorption of ν(C19 = O)* stretching vibration in the electronically excited state. (b) Bleaching signals of ν(C19 = Oa) and ν(C19=Ob) stretching vibrations in the Pr state (solid and open red circles, respectively). (c) Bleaching signal of ν(C1=O) stretching vibration and ν(C19=O) absorption of lumi-R.

FIG. 4.

Decay associated spectrum at time zero and simulation for polarizations parallel (‖) and perpendicular (⊥) to the pump pulse polarization. The DAS at time zero is the sum of all DAS components. Negative peak at 1724 cm−1, ν(C1=O) stretching vibration; positive signals around 1715 cm−1, ν(C1=O)* stretching vibration in the electronically excited state; negative peak at 1708 cm−1, ν(C19=O)b stretching vibration; shoulder at 1701 cm−1, ν(C19=O)a stretching vibration; positive peak at 1680 cm−1, ν(C19=O)* stretching vibration.

Thus, these findings demonstrate the heterogeneity of the chromophore structure in phytochromes and shed new light on the analysis of phytochrome infrared spectra in the spectral region around 1700 cm−1.

As it turns out, the crystal structure exhibits only the hydrogen bonded chromophore geometry PCBa (Fig. 6(a)). Thus, we modeled the second chromophore geometry (Fig. 6(b)), which exhibits a ν(C19=Ob) vibrational tdm vector more parallel to the μel (16°), than the PCBa geometry (29°). We rotate ring D to the β facial chromophore side and optimized the geometry by density functional theory (DFT). In this position, the C19=O group of ring D is not able to form a hydrogen bond. Calculations show a small frequency blue shift of 1 cm−1 (Table I), while experiments provide a frequency blue shift of a 7 cm−1. This is due to the missing hydrogen bond of the more planar geometry PCBb.

FIG. 6.

Calculated PCB chromophore geometries with Pr S0→S1 transition dipole moment μ (black arrow) and vibrational tdms of ν(C19=O)a and ν(C1=O) (red arrows). μ and μ show negligible components in the z direction, in contrast to μ. (a) PCBa geometry, (b) PCBb geometry, and (c) lumi-R geometry (α-facial ring D position). Note, tdm arrows can point in either direction.

TABLE I.

Assignment of vibrational modes, their experimental frequencies νexp, their calculated frequencies νcalc, their experimental angles θexp relative to the excited electronic tdm, 1σ angle error ranges, calculated angles θcalc relative to the excited electronic tdm. Chromophore geometries are given.

Vibrational mode	νexp (cm−1)	νcalc (cm−1)	θexp (°)	1 σ (°)	θcalc (°)	Geom.
Pr μC19=O*	1680	…	30	27–33	…	ZZZssa
Pr μC19=Oa	1701	1709	29	12–46	21.3	ZZZssa
Pr μC19=Ob	1708	1710	16	6–25 a	11.6	ZZZssa
Pr μC1=O*	1715	…	60	48–72	…	ZZZssa
Pr μC1=O	1724	1719	43	36–50	42.4	ZZZssa
Lumi-R μC19=O	1718	1707	54 b	46–58	61	ZZEssa

Error range determined by combination of a covariance method and polarization resolved perturbed free induction decay measurements.

Lumi-R angle calculated from DAS offset contribution (Fig. S4).

At 1724 cm−1, the ground state recovery of the ν(C1=O) vibration of ring A is detected (Fig. 2(c)). Here, we see the strongest contribution of the fast 4.7 ps time constant (40%). The bleaching signal is superimposed with lumi-R photoproduct absorption that arises after 40 ps. Since ring A is not involved in the photoisomerization process, the fast 4.7 ps time constant is attributed to a deactivation pathway.

Polarization resolved transients provide information on the angle between the S0-S1 electronic transition dipole moment vector (μel) and the probed vibrational transition dipole moment vectors (μvib). As depicted in Figs. 3(a)–3(c), all three bleaching bands exhibit different dichroic ratios (DRs), which are the ratios of parallel and perpendicular absorption signals (DR = A‖/A⊥). From the dichroic ratio DR, the angle θ between μel and μvib can be calculated as θ = a cos[(2 DR − 1)/(DR + 2)]½.

FIG. 3.

Polarization resolved transients for parallel (‖) and perpendicular (⊥) probe polarization, with respect to the pump pulse polarization. Angles are calculated at a 0.5 ps delay time from the dichroic ratio DR. (a) Ring D ν(C19=O) stretch vibration in PCB geometry a; (b) Ring D ν(C19=O) stretch vibration in PCB geometry b; (c) Ring A ν(C1=O) stretch vibration and Ring D ν(C19=O) stretch vibration of lumi-R; (d) Ring D ν(C19=O)* stretch vibration in the electronically excited state. Reproduced with permission from Yang et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 1408–1411 (2012). Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.

Since some of the bleaching transients are partially superimposed on vibrational bands of the electronically excited state, the angles given in Figure 3 provide only a reasonable estimate. A more precise determination can be made from the DAS at time zero. The DAS spectra at time zero for each polarization are presented in Fig. 4. These are derived by biexponential global fits of the transients, and simulated with a sum of five Lorentzian line shapes. The time constants, positions, linewidths, and heights of ν(C=O) vibrational bands used for the polarization resolved DAS simulation were obtained by exhaustive search analysis of the complete set of measured data at isotropic polarization, including perturbed free induction decay analysis. The frequency position of the ring A ν(C1=O) vibrational bleaching band is found at 1724 cm−1 with a width of 8 cm−1 (FWHM).

In the electronically excited state, absorption bands are centered at 1715 cm−1 and 1680 cm−1 for the ν(C1=O)* and ν(C19=O)* vibrations, respectively. The ν(C19=O)* vibration is most strongly influenced by the electronic excitation and exhibits an absorption line width of 27 cm−1 (FWHM) with pronounced transient signals. In contrast, the absorption band of the ν(C1=O)* vibration exhibits a very small signal and is located at 1715 cm−1 with a line width of 8 cm−1 FWHM (Fig. S3). The ν(C1=O)* vibration is only detectable by its dichroic ratio, which is below one and results in a positive peak in the spectrum for perpendicular polarization at around 1715 cm−1 (Fig. 4). The small contribution of the ν(C1=O)* vibration to the signal is attributed to weak anharmonic coupling, which is made possible by negligible structural change in ring A during photoisomerization.

Analysis of polarization resolved DAS spectra at time zero yields the angles between μel and the investigated vibrational tdms (Table I). Additionally, the angle (μel, μC19=O*) between the S0-S1 tdm and the ν(C19=O)* stretching vibrational tdm was analyzed by ExSeAn and an angle of 30° (1σ range of 18° to 42°) was determined. Error margins given in Table I were derived by the covariance matrix method. All determined angles are compatible with the values directly deduced from the kinetic traces, except the angle (μel, μC1=O*), which is not observable in the transients.

The polarization resolved decay of the ν(C19=O) vibration in both its electronically excited state and its ground state is presented in Figs. 5(a) and 5(b) on a logarithmic scale. While the two decaying polarization resolved transients of the ν(C19=Ob) bleaching band in Fig. 5(a) show identical slopes, the slopes of the two polarization resolved transients for the ν(C19=O)* stretching band in the electronically excited state are different (Fig. 5(b)). This was interpreted as ring D orientational change in the electronic excited state to the transition state (90° twist) with a time constant of 30 ps and a quantum yield of about 16%. The time dependent dichroic ratio change (Fig. 5(c)) shows a negligible increase up to 3 ps, followed by a decrease on the time scale of tens of picoseconds. The average angle increases steadily up to 30 ps, supporting the argument that the fast time component of 4.7 ps is associated with C=C bond order reduction, a prerequisite for ring D rotation, and relaxation processes that lead to the initial ground state.

FIG. 5.

Polarization resolved transient signals and simulations of the ν(C19=O) stretching vibration. (a) ν(C19=O)b vibration in the Pr ground state plotted on a logarithmic scale: Identical slopes for parallel (‖) and perpendicular (⊥) polarization indicate no change in dichroic behavior. (b) ν(C19=O)* vibration in the Pr excited state plotted on a logarithmic scale: Transient for parallel polarization (‖) exhibits a steeper slope than that for perpendicular (⊥) polarization, demonstrating a change to greater angles. (c) DR calculated by the data (circles) and simulations (blue line) of the ν(C19=O)* vibrational data presented in (b). The simulation shows a negligible increase up to 3 ps, followed by a decrease on the time scale of tens of picoseconds. Reproduced with permission from Yang et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 1408–1411 (2012). Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.

Thus, our data support an isomerization mechanism with a single isomerization around the C15=C16 double bond via a strongly twisted transition state. An isomerization mechanism including an additional rotation around the C14-C15 single bond in the electronically excited state would result in negligible dichroic ratio changes and is therefore less likely. The initial negligible increase of the dichroic signal (Fig. 5(c)) over time, followed by a delayed dichroic signal decrease can be explained by two models: (I) Ring D rotates away from His290 to smaller twisting angles (clockwise rotation) for PCBa chromophore geometries with α-facial disposition, while the non-isomerizing PCBb chromophores with β-facial disposition rattle around their average orientation. The α-facial disposition is defined by ring D lying on the α-face of the coplanar B- and C-rings. This implies ring D to be located on the β-facial side after isomerization, in contrast to the Pfr structure reported by Song et al. on Cph1. (II) A significant part of the PCBa chromophores with α-facial disposition show counter-clockwise rotation of ring D, thereby slowly passing His290 resulting in a slow dichroic decrease. Another part of PCBa chromophores with β-facial disposition rotate clockwise to smaller twisting angles on a faster time scale, but do not isomerize, thereby increasing the dichroic ratio (Fig. 5(c)). Non-isomerizing PCBb chromophores rattle around their average orientation and decay to the ground state. This implies ring D to be located on the α-facial side after isomerization, in agreement with the Pfr structure presented by Song et al. on Cph1. This is the model we favor.

Combining measured relative angles for the Pr ground state (see Table I) with calculated angles, we are able to verify structural models of the chromophore in the protein binding pocket. The calculated angles of the ZZZssa structural model shown in Fig. 6 are in complete agreement with the experimentally determined ones (Table I). The chromophore structures with orientation of ring D for PCBa and PCBb match very well with the Pr-II and Pr-I geometries reported by Song et al., respectively.

Lumi-R formation was estimated with a quantum yield of about 12% and an angle (μel, μC19=O) of ±54°, matching the calculated angle of 61° for the ZZEssa geometry shown in Fig. 6(c) (see also Figs. S4, S6, and S7). From one relative angle alone one cannot determine whether lumi-R adopts a α-facial or β-facial geometry of ring D. Circular dichroism (CD) experiments showed opposite rotational strengths of Pr and Pfr in the longest wavelength band, suggesting a reversal of chirality upon photoisomerization, and thus supporting model II. But heterogeneity of Pr ground states complicate interpretation of CD spectra, since PCBa and PCBb geometries show opposite rotational strengths with a twofold calculated intensity strength for PCBa (Fig. S5).

Using transients and difference spectra, the individual quantum yields of PCBa and PCBb geometries were determined. The more planar PCBb geometry without hydrogen bonding exhibits a ninefold lesser quantum yield of 3%, and has a twofold population as compared to the hydrogen bonded PCBa geometry with quantum yield of 29%. This indicates that pre-twisting of ring D in the electronic ground state via a single hydrogen bond increases the quantum yield for lumi-R formation significantly.

On the basis of the Cph1 crystal structure, previously reported models, and our data, we propose a detailed model for counter-clockwise Pr photoisomerization. Photoexcitation of the chromophore to the electronically excited state S1 shifts the positive charge from ring B and ring C toward C14 = C15 methine bridge of ring D. Reduction of negative charge at ring D breaks the hydrogen bond between His290 and the ring D C19=O group. This enables His290 to move away and open the door for counter-clockwise rotation of ring D. Additionally, the positive charge at C14 = C15 methine bridge alters the hydrogen bond of the water between ring B and ring C, and the hydrogen bond of amino acids Asp207 and Tyr263 in the vicinity of rings C and D. Changes in the hydrogen bond network can induce displacement of Asp207 and Tyr263 reducing steric hindrance for counter-clockwise rotation of PCBa ring D with α-facial disposition. Tyr176 is not directly involved in a hydrogen bond network in the Pr state, but is expected to induce steric hindrance for clockwise rotation of PCBb ring D with β-facial disposition. In the electronically excited state, the double bond character of the C14=C15 methine bridge is reduced, and potential energy from the distorted chromophore ring D is transformed to rotational energy. A part of the PCBa chromophores passes His290, rotate counter-clockwise to the transition state, and isomerizes, while the remaining PCBa chromophores rotate clockwise, do not overcome the potential barriers, and relax back to the ground state.

Only about 3% of the chromophores with PCBb geometry overcome the potential barrier in the electronic excited state and isomerize to lumi-R (Figs. 7(a) and 7(b), blue lines), while 97% relax back to the Pr ground state.

FIG. 7.

Schematic potential energy surface as a function of the angle between ring C and ring D plane for model II. Reaction pathways (black arrows) and quantum yields (black numbers) of PCBa. Time constants are given for both PCB geometries. PCBb reaction pathways (blue arrows) and quantum yields (blue numbers). Excitation of PCBb (blue arrow) show small excess energies too low to overcome the barriers efficiently. After PCBa excitation to the S1 state (black arrow) the hydrogen bond to His290 breaks and His290 moves away, resulting in a potential barrier reduction (red arrow). The PCBa chromophores are able to rotate counter-clockwise to the twisted transition state with a −90° distortion angle. With a quantum yield of 29% the forward reaction to lumi-R occurs. Only a small fraction (3%) of the chromophores with PCBb geometry overcomes the barrier and photoisomerizes to a photoproduct.

Whether the two Pr isoforms n class="Chemical">PCBa and PCBb undergo interconversion between the silent and the active forms can be tested by temperature dependent measurements.

Rotation of ring D to a more planar geometry is suggested by a dichroic ratio increase in the ν(C19=O)* vibrational band within the first 3 ps (Fig. 5(c)) and a fluorescence red-shift on the same timescale. A more planar geometry between ring C and ring D reduces the strain in the C14-C15=C16 moiety and induces dramatic changes in the C15-H hydrogen out of plane mode due to increased steric interaction between ring C and ring D within the first picoseconds, as also reported by femtosecond time resolved Raman experiments. Intramolecular steric interactions between the C13 methyl of ring C and the N-H of ring D prevent planarity of the C14-C15=C16 moiety, resulting in a barrier in the electronic excited state (Fig. 7). In most cases, the rotational energy of the chromophores is too low to pass the potential barrier separating the two geometries. PCBa chromophores passing His290 experience a shallow excited state potential surface allowing ring D rotation to higher distortion angles and the formation of a transition state in which ring D is twisted by 90°. The increase in distortion angle of ring D is reflected by the decrease in dichroic ratio over time (Fig. 5(c)). After passing the His290, changes in the C15-H hydrogen out of plane mode due to steric interaction between ring C and ring D are negligible. As a result of the shallow excited state potential energy surface ring D rotation occurs on a time scale of tens of ps. From there, relaxation to the electronic ground state Pr is observed with the same time constant as lumi-R formation (30 ps).

PCBb chromophores without a hydrogen bond to His290 exhibit a more planar geometry and lower potential energy on the excited state surface as presented in Figure 7, resulting in a lower probability for reaching the transition state and forming lumi-R. As depicted in Figure 7, the stronger the pre-twisting the higher the potential energy and the higher the lumi-R quantum yield. Consequently, phytochromes with amino acids blocking the space needed for ring D rotation, as shown for the Cph1-Y263F mutant, or in which ring D is fixed with additional hydrogen bonds, would exhibit a reduced quantum yield for lumi-R formation. Such observations have been reported by other groups, thus corroborating our model.

CONCLUSION

In Cph1 phytochrome, Pr photoisomerization and rotation of ring D occurs in the electronic excited state via a 90° twisted transition state with a time constant of 30 ± 5 ps. A sixfold faster relaxation time constant of 4.7 ± 1.4 ps is also present. This would normally lead to a poor quantum yield. However, heterogeneity, that is, two possible chromophore geometries PCBa and PCBb, leads to two photoreactions with differing efficiencies. We identified PCBa and PCBb geometries with distinct quantum yields of 29% and 3%, respectively. The PCBa and PCBb geometries match the Pr-II and Pr-I geometries determined by NMR studies, respectively. PCBa (Pr-II) has a strongly pre-twisted ring D geometry induced by a hydrogen bond between ring D's carbonyl group and His290. The pre-twisting of PCBa (Pr-II) allows a higher potential energy in the electronic excited state to be reached, permitting potential barriers induced by steric hindrance to be overcome. This chromophore geometry exhibits a ninefold higher quantum yield than PCBb (Pr-I), but a sixfold longer time constant of 30 ± 5 ps. The high quantum yield in combination with a long time constant is very unusual for photoreceptors.

This demonstrates an alternative evolutionary strategy to improve photoreactions. Pre-twisting of the chromophore by strong steric interactions and hydrogen bonding in the ground and electronic excited states enhance the photoreaction quantum yield by separating reaction pathways for differing geometries in the electronic excited state. This mechanism optimizes yields of slow photoreactions by large structural rearrangements and provides a scaffold for photoreceptor engineering.

METHODS

Pump and probe pulses were generated using nonlinear optical methods. By difference frequency mixing in various steps, we obtained mid-IR pulses of 200 fs (FWHM) or shorter at a repetition rate of 1.088 kHz. Simultaneously, laser pulses of 200 fs duration at 660 nm were generated and used to photoexcite the sample in the absorption maximum of the Pr form, thus initiating the photoreaction (Fig. 1). Photoselection experiments were performed using focal pump pulse diameters of 500 μm, sample thicknesses of 50 μm, focal probe pulse diameters of 180 μm, and pump pulse energies of 30 nJ. This results in excitation coefficients of below 3% and in relative signal strengths in agreement with electronic extinction coefficient of PCB (∼82 000 (Mcm)−1) and extinction coefficient of C=O stretching vibrations (∼2000 (Mcm)−1). The transient absorption was simultaneously probed by two mid-IR pulses with polarizations oriented parallel and perpendicular, with respect to the pump pulse polarization at various delay times. Probe pulses were dispersed with an imaging spectrograph and recorded with a 2 × 32 element MCT array detector. We prepared the 13C/15N labeled Cph1Δ2 phytochrome holoprotein (non-labelled PCB chromophore) in 2H2O solution at an optical density of 0.4 optical density at 660 nm, as described previously. Background illumination at wavelengths longer than 715 nm ensures that the sample remains in the Pr form. The high repetition rate requires that the sample be moved across the focused laser beams with a Lissajous sample cell in order to avoid multiple excitation of a specific sample volume. For comparison, the vibrational tdms were determined theoretically at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level of theory. The structures of the different chromophores were obtained as described.