| Literature DB >> 26798386 |
Ju Youn Kim1, Woo-Seung Shin1, Tae-Seok Kim1, Sung-Hwan Kim1, Ji-Hoon Kim1, Sung-Won Jang1, Hui-Nam Pak2, Gi-Byoung Nam3, Man Young Lee1, Tai-Ho Rho1, Yong Seog Oh1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Identifying the critical isthmus of slow conduction is crucial for successful treatment of scar-related ventricular tachycardia. Current 3D mapping is not designed for tracking the critical isthmus and may lead to a risk of extensive ablation. We edited the algorithm to track the delayed potential in order to visualize the isthmus and compared the edited map with a conventional map. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We marked every point that showed delayed potential with blue color. After substrate mapping, we edited to reset the annotation from true ventricular potential to delayed potential and then changed the window of interest from the conventional zone (early, 50-60%; late, 40-50% from peak of QRS) to the edited zone (early, 80-90%; late, 10-20%) for every blue point. Finally, we compared the propagation maps before and after editing.Entities:
Keywords: Delayed potential; Electroanatomical mapping; Scar-related ventricular tachycardia
Year: 2015 PMID: 26798386 PMCID: PMC4720850 DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.1.56
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean Circ J ISSN: 1738-5520 Impact factor: 3.243
Fig. 112-lead ECG of clinical VT and that of VT that was induced and targeted during the induction study. Nonclinical VT showed different axis and cycle lengths. VTs that were documented in the ICD electrograms showed similar cycle lengths and could not be terminated by anti-tachycardial pacing. ECG: electrocardiogram, VT: ventricular tachycardia, ICD: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Fig. 2Editing the annotation and the window of interest. (A) In conventional mapping, annotation was set to the maximum ventricular potential (arrow), and the window of interest was set to 5:5. (B) After we reset the conventional map, annotation was set to the local delayed potential (arrow), and the window of interest was reset to 9:1.
Baseline characteristics
| Pt | Age | Sex | LVEF (%) | Drugs | Scar location | VT CL (ms) | No. of induced VTs | Additional induced VT (nonclinical) | Map points | Substrate volume (cm3) | EAM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46 | M | 23 | Amio+BB | Apex | 250 | 1 | No | 195 | 145 | C |
| 2 | 71 | M | 34 | Amio+BB | Septal | 397 | 3 | Yes | 233 | 84 | C+R |
| 3 | 55 | M | 20 | None | Antero-septal | 330 | 4 | Yes | 300 | 245 | C+R |
| 4 | 61 | M | 40 | BB | Apex | 344 | 3 | No | 312 | 149 | C+R |
| 5 | 70 | M | 18 | None | Apex | 357 | 4 | Yes | 292 | 195 | C+R |
RPt: patient, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, VT: ventricular tachycardia, CL: cycle length, Amio: amiodarone, BB: beta blocker, C: CARTO, R: remote magnetic navigation system
Fig. 3Voltage map showing the locations of delayed potentials (AP view). Blue dots denote delayed potentials, which are noted along the scar border zone. Tracing of the diastolic potentials (black arrow) and entrainment of the exit and bystander sites were shown. Entrainment showed concealed fusion. AP: anterior-posterior, S-QRS: stim to QRS, PPI: post-pacing interval, VTCL: ventricular tachycardia cycle length.
Fig. 4Activation map before (A) and after (B) editing. Voltage map showing the locations of the delayed potentials (C). Delayed potentials are tagged with blue dots, and scar sites are tagged with grey dots. After editing, the activation map shows the area where the early zone meets the late zone, which represents the reentry mechanism.
Fig. 5Propagation map before (A) and after (B) editing. Delayed potentials are tagged with blue dots, and scar sites are tagged with grey dots. The white arrow shows the direction of propagation. (A) from apex to base; (B) figure 8 reentry through the isthmus.