OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the determinants of ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence in patients who underwent VT ablation for post-infarction VT. BACKGROUND: The factors that predict recurrence of VT after catheter ablation in patients with prior infarctions are not well described. METHODS: Catheter ablation was performed in 98 consecutive patients (88 males [90%]; mean age 67 ± 10 years; ejection fraction 27 ± 13%) with post-infarction VT. Electrograms from the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator were analyzed, and VTs were classified as clinical, nonclinical, or new clinical. RESULTS: A total of 725 VTs were induced during the ablation procedure. All VTs were targeted. In 76 patients, 105 clinical VTs were inducible. Critical sites were identified with entrainment mapping and pace-mapping (≥10 of 12 matching leads) for 75 of 105 clinical VTs (71%) and for 278 of 620 nonclinical VTs (45%). Post-ablation, the clinical VT was not inducible in any patient, and all VTs were rendered noninducible in 63% of the patients. Over a mean follow-up period of 35 ± 23 months, 65 of 98 patients (66%) had no recurrent VTs and 33 (34%) had VT recurrence. A new VT occurred in 26 of 33 patients (79%), and a prior clinical VT recurred in 7 patients (21%). Patients with recurrent VT had a larger scar area as assessed by electroanatomic mapping compared with patients without recurrent VTs (93 ± 40 cm(2) vs. 69 ± 30 cm(2); p = 0.002). In patients with repeat procedures, the majority of inducible VTs for which a critical area could be identified were at a distance of 6 ± 3 mm to the prior ablation lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with recurrent VTs have a larger scar as assessed by electroanatomic mapping. Most recurrent VTs were new, and the majority of these VTs were mapped to the vicinity of prior ablation lesions in patients with repeat procedures.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the determinants of ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence in patients who underwent VT ablation for post-infarction VT. BACKGROUND: The factors that predict recurrence of VT after catheter ablation in patients with prior infarctions are not well described. METHODS: Catheter ablation was performed in 98 consecutive patients (88 males [90%]; mean age 67 ± 10 years; ejection fraction 27 ± 13%) with post-infarction VT. Electrograms from the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator were analyzed, and VTs were classified as clinical, nonclinical, or new clinical. RESULTS: A total of 725 VTs were induced during the ablation procedure. All VTs were targeted. In 76 patients, 105 clinical VTs were inducible. Critical sites were identified with entrainment mapping and pace-mapping (≥10 of 12 matching leads) for 75 of 105 clinical VTs (71%) and for 278 of 620 nonclinical VTs (45%). Post-ablation, the clinical VT was not inducible in any patient, and all VTs were rendered noninducible in 63% of the patients. Over a mean follow-up period of 35 ± 23 months, 65 of 98 patients (66%) had no recurrent VTs and 33 (34%) had VT recurrence. A new VT occurred in 26 of 33 patients (79%), and a prior clinical VT recurred in 7 patients (21%). Patients with recurrent VT had a larger scar area as assessed by electroanatomic mapping compared with patients without recurrent VTs (93 ± 40 cm(2) vs. 69 ± 30 cm(2); p = 0.002). In patients with repeat procedures, the majority of inducible VTs for which a critical area could be identified were at a distance of 6 ± 3 mm to the prior ablation lesions. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with recurrent VTs have a larger scar as assessed by electroanatomic mapping. Most recurrent VTs were new, and the majority of these VTs were mapped to the vicinity of prior ablation lesions in patients with repeat procedures.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Konstantinos C Siontis; Hyungjin Myra Kim; William G Stevenson; Akira Fujii; Paolo Della Bella; Pasquale Vergara; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Roderick Tung; Duc H Do; Emile G Daoud; Toshimasa Okabe; Katja Zeppenfeld; Marta de Riva Silva; Gerhard Hindricks; Arash Arya; Alexander Weber; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Andreas Metzner; Shibu Mathew; Johannes Riedl; Miki Yokokawa; Krit Jongnarangsin; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Fred Morady; Frank M Bogun Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2016-12
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Eric Sung; Adityo Prakosa; Konstantinos N Aronis; Shijie Zhou; Stefan L Zimmerman; Harikrishna Tandri; Saman Nazarian; Ronald D Berger; Jonathan Chrispin; Natalia A Trayanova Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2020-11-16
Authors: Vishal Luther; Shahnaz Jamil-Copley; Michael Koa-Wing; Matthew Shun-Shin; Sajat Hayat; Nicholas W Linton; Phang Boon Lim; Zachary Whinnett; Ian J Wright; David Lefroy; Nicholas S Peters; D Wyn Davies; Prapa Kanagaratnam Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2015-04-11 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: David Calvo; Felipe Atienza; Javier Saiz; Laura Martínez; Pablo Ávila; José Rubín; Benito Herreros; Ángel Arenal; Javier García-Fernández; Ana Ferrer; Rafael Sebastián; Pablo Martínez-Camblor; José Jalife; Omer Berenfeld Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2015-08-07