| Literature DB >> 26798341 |
Saverio Massimo Lepore1, Valeria Maria Morittu1, Marilena Celano1, Francesca Trimboli1, Manuela Oliverio1, Antonio Procopio1, Carla Di Loreto2, Giuseppe Damante2, Domenico Britti1, Stefania Bulotta1, Diego Russo1.
Abstract
The high consumption of olive tree products in the Mediterranean diet has been associated with a lower incidence of metabolic disorders and cardiovascular diseases. In particular, the protective effects of olive oil have been attributed to the presence of polyphenols such as oleuropein (Ole) and its derivatives. We have synthesized a peracetylated derivative of Ole (Ac-Ole) which has shown in vitro antioxidant and growth-inhibitory activity higher than the natural molecule. In this study, male C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice were fed with a standard (std), cafeteria (caf) diet, and caf diet supplemented with Ole (0.037 mmol/kg/day) and Ac-Ole (0.025 mmol/kg/day) for 15 weeks. We observed a significant reduction in the caf diet-induced body weight gain and increase of abdominal adipose tissue. Also, Ole and Ac-Ole prevented the development of hepatic steatosis. Finally, Ole and Ac-Ole determined a lower increase of HDL and LDL-cholesterol levels and corrected caf diet-induced elevation of plasma glucose concentrations by improving insulin sensitivity. The observed beneficial properties of Ole and Ac-Ole make these compounds and in particular Ac-Ole promising candidates for a potential pharmaceutic use in metabolic disorders.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26798341 PMCID: PMC4700197 DOI: 10.1155/2015/431453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol ISSN: 1687-8337 Impact factor: 3.257
Composition of the standard and cafeteria diets.
| STD | CAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy density (kcal/g) | 3.1 | 4.9 |
|
| ||
| Protein (%) | 18.6 | 8.4 |
|
| ||
| Fat (%) | 6.2 | 26.0 |
|
| ||
| Carbohydrate (%) | 44.2 | 52.7 |
|
| ||
| Fiber (%) | 3.5 | 1.8 |
|
| ||
| Salt (%) | 0.2 | 0.3 |
|
| ||
| Iron (%) | 0.02 | 0.004 |
|
| ||
| Calcium (%) | 1.0 | 0.2 |
|
| ||
| Potassium (%) | 0.6 | 0.2 |
|
| ||
| Phosphorus (%) | 0.7 | 0.2 |
|
| ||
| Zinc (%) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
|
| ||
| B1 (%) | 0.0017 | 0.0003 |
|
| ||
| B2 (%) | 0.0015 | 0.0003 |
Effects of Ole and Ac-Ole on hematological parameters.
| Parameter | Units | STD | CAF | OLE | Ac-OLE | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBC | (103/mm3) | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 0.8 | 3.8 ± 1.2 | 4.0 ± 1.0 | 2.3–7.7 |
| RBC | (106/mm3) | 8.6 ± 1.1 | 9.6 ± 0.2 | 9.0 ± 0.3 | 9.3 ± 0.4 | 8.4–10.2 |
| HGB | (g/dL) | 13.4 ± 0.2 | 14.1 ± 0.5 | 12.4 ± 0.4 | 12.8 ± 0.4 | 12.6–14.6 |
| HCT | (%) | 41.9 ± 6.3 | 46.5 ± 2.1 | 43.7 ± 1.5 | 44.3 ± 2.1 | 41.9–49.9 |
| MCV | (fL) | 48.3 ± 1.2 | 48.3 ± 1.5 | 48.4 ± 1.1 | 47.4 ± 0.6 | 48.0–52.0 |
| MCH | (pg) | 14.6 ± 0.1 | 14.7 ± 0.4 | 13.8 ± 0.2 | 13.7 ± 0.1 | 14.3–15.3 |
| MCHC | (%) | 30.4 ± 0.7 | 30.4 ± 0.5 | 28.4 ± 0.4 | 29.0 ± 0.4 | 28.6–30.8 |
| Platelets | (103/ | 1183.2 ± 71.4 | 1097.0 ± 316.8 | 1170.2 ± 160.0 | 1041.2 ± 317.7 | 980–1390 |
| Neutrophils | (%) | 7.4 ± 1.8 | 13.1 ± 6.4 | 9.8 ± 1.8 | 11.4 ± 2.1 | 2–34 |
| Lymphocytes | (%) | 87.6 ± 1.1 | 81.4 ± 7.3 | 86.2 ± 2.3 | 80.9 ± 5.6 | 59–97 |
| Monocytes | (%) | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.9 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 1.7 | 0–6 |
| Eosinophils | (%) | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 2.1 ± 0.8 | 1.4 ± 0.8 | 2.3 ± 1.4 | 0–2 |
Blood samples were collected at the end of treatments and analysed using Hematology Analyzer ADVIA 2120 (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics s.r.l., Milan, Italy) to obtain hematology parameters. STD: mice fed with STD diet; CAF: mice fed with CAF diet; OLE = mice fed with CAF diet plus OLE at 0.037 mmol/kg/day; Ac-OLE: mice fed with CAF diet plus Ac-OLE at 0.025 mmol/kg/day. WBC: white blood cells; RBC: red blood cells; HGB: hemoglobin; HCT: hematocrit; MCV: mean corpuscular volume; MCH: mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC: mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration.
Figure 1Effects of Ole and Ac-Ole on body weight and girth waist. (a) Body weight and (b) N-A length and girth waist are relative to the end of treatment (15 weeks). (c) Abdominal fat tissue weight. Values are mean ± SD. P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 compared to mice fed with std diet; °P < 0.05 and °°P < 0.01 compared to mice fed with caf diet.
Effects of Ole and Ac-Ole on food and energy intake.
| STD | CAF | OLE | Ac-OLE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food intake (g/week) | 20.8 ± 0.8 | 22.8 ± 2.8 | 22.1 ± 2.4 | 21.6 ± 2.1 |
| Energy intake (kcal/week) | 64.5 ± 2.6 | 103.0 ± 9.2 | 101.2 ± 10.8 | 99.9 ± 6.2 |
STD: mice fed with STD diet; CAF: mice fed with CAF diet; OLE = mice fed with CAF diet plus Ole at 0.037 mmol/kg/day; Ac-OLE = mice fed with CAF diet plus Ac-Ole at 0.025 mmol/kg/day. Values are mean ± SD. P < 0.001 versus STD.
Figure 2Effects of Ole and Ac-Ole on liver weight and liver histology. (a) Liver weight was significantly reduced in mice fed with a caf diet supplemented with Ole or Ac-Ole. (b) Relative liver weight. (c) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of liver sections (10x magnification). The liver of mice CAF was rich in fat vacuoles (indicated by the arrow). (d) Quantification of steatosis was expressed as mean of percentage of vacuolated cells calculated for each mouse liver. Values are mean ± SD. P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 compared to STD; °P < 0.05 and °°P < 0.01 compared to CAF.
Figure 3Histologic analysis of aorta, lung, and kidney. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of aorta, lung, and kidney sections (10x magnification) from mice fed with std or caf diet.
Effects of Ole and Ac-Ole on serum parameters.
| Parameter | Units | STD | CAF | OLE | Ac-OLE | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cholesterol | mg/dL | 108.7 ± 6.2 | 183.0 ± 13.4 | 158.2 ± 23.4 | 158.5 ± 18.5 | 43.7–126.2 |
| HDL | mg/dL | 94.7 ± 3.8 | 136.0 ± 7.5 | 121.0 ± 12.3 | 123.2 ± 19.5 | 51.1–102.5 |
| LDL | mg/dL | 14.0 ± 2.7 | 47.0 ± 7 | 29.3 ± 4.7 | 30.7 ± 3.4 | 13.8–31.0 |
| Triglycerides | mg/dL | 47.0 ± 8.9 | 52.6 ± 3.5 | 39.0 ± 6.5 | 57.5 ± 6.5 | 47.1–254.9 |
| ALT | U/L | 36.5 ± 1.9 | 41.7 ± 2.2 | 28.7 ± 0.9°°° | 31.0 ± 7.8°°° | 13.3–80.2 |
| AST | U/L | 97.7 ± 11.1 | 169.3 ± 10.7 | 128.8 ± 7.4° | 90.0 ± 8.5°°° | 40.8–510.6 |
STD: mice fed with STD diet; CAF: mice fed with CAF diet; OLE: mice fed with CAF diet plus Ole at 0.037 mmol/kg/day; Ac-OLE: mice fed with CAF diet plus Ac-Ole at 0.025 mmol/kg/day; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; HDL: high density lipoproteins; LDL: low density lipoproteins. Reference range calculated on the data published in Mouse Database Phenomena (Jackson Laboratory) (http://phenome.jax.org). Values are mean ± SD. P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 compared to STD; °P < 0.05, °°P < 0.01, and °°°P < 0.001 compared to CAF.
Figure 4Effects on plasma levels of glucose, insulin, and leptin and evaluation of insulin resistance after treatment with Ole and Ac-Ole. Blood samples were collected as indicated in Methods. Glucose and hormones levels were significantly lower after treatment with Ole and Ac-Ole in animals fed with caf diet. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated as indicated in Methods. Values are mean ± SD. P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 compared to STD; °°P < 0.01 and °°°P < 0.001 compared to CAF.