Line Vikingsson1, María Sancho-Tello2, Amparo Ruiz-Saurí2, Santos Martínez Díaz3, José A Gómez-Tejedor1,4, Gloria Gallego Ferrer1,4, Carmen Carda2, Joan C Monllau3, José L Gómez Ribelles1,4. 1. Center for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering (CBIT), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia - Spain. 2. Department of Pathology, University of Valencia and INCLIVA University Clinic Hospital, Valencia - Spain. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital del Mar, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona - Spain. 4. Biomedical Research Networking Center on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Valencia - Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Articular cartilage has limited repair capacity. Two different implant devices for articular cartilage regeneration were tested in vivo in a sheep model to evaluate the effect of subchondral bone anchoring for tissue repair. METHODS: The implants were placed with press-fit technique in a cartilage defect after microfracture surgery in the femoral condyle of the knee joint of the sheep and histologic and mechanical evaluation was done 4.5 months later. The first group consisted of a biodegradable polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffold with double porosity. The second test group consisted of a PCL scaffold attached to a poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) pin anchored to the subchondral bone. RESULTS: For both groups most of the defects (75%) showed an articular surface that was completely or almost completely repaired with a neotissue. Nevertheless, the surface had a rougher appearance than controls and the repair tissue was immature. In the trials with solely scaffold implantation, severe subchondral bone alterations were seen with many large nodular formations. These alterations were ameliorated when implanting the scaffold with a subchondral bone anchoring pin. DISCUSSIONS: The results show that tissue repair is improved by implanting a PCL scaffold compared to solely microfracture surgery, and most importantly, that subchondral bone alterations, normally seen after microfracture surgery, were partially prevented when implanting the PCL scaffold with a fixation system to the subchondral bone.
PURPOSE:Articular cartilage has limited repair capacity. Two different implant devices for articular cartilage regeneration were tested in vivo in a sheep model to evaluate the effect of subchondral bone anchoring for tissue repair. METHODS: The implants were placed with press-fit technique in a cartilage defect after microfracture surgery in the femoral condyle of the knee joint of the sheep and histologic and mechanical evaluation was done 4.5 months later. The first group consisted of a biodegradable polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffold with double porosity. The second test group consisted of a PCL scaffold attached to a poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) pin anchored to the subchondral bone. RESULTS: For both groups most of the defects (75%) showed an articular surface that was completely or almost completely repaired with a neotissue. Nevertheless, the surface had a rougher appearance than controls and the repair tissue was immature. In the trials with solely scaffold implantation, severe subchondral bone alterations were seen with many large nodular formations. These alterations were ameliorated when implanting the scaffold with a subchondral bone anchoring pin. DISCUSSIONS: The results show that tissue repair is improved by implanting a PCL scaffold compared to solely microfracture surgery, and most importantly, that subchondral bone alterations, normally seen after microfracture surgery, were partially prevented when implanting the PCL scaffold with a fixation system to the subchondral bone.
Authors: James M Friedman; Mackenzie L Sennett; Marcelo B Bonadio; Kerry O Orji; Alexander L Neuwirth; Niobra Keah; James L Carey; Franklin T Moutos; Bradley T Estes; Farshid Guilak; Henning Madry; Robert L Mauck; George R Dodge Journal: Cartilage Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Jay M Patel; Mackenzie L Sennett; Anthony R Martin; Kamiel S Saleh; Michael R Eby; Blair S Ashley; Liane M Miller; George R Dodge; Jason A Burdick; James L Carey; Robert L Mauck Journal: Cartilage Date: 2020-10-09 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: M Drobnic; Francesco Perdisa; E Kon; F Cefalì; M Marcacci; G Filardo Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-10-11 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Hadi Eftekhari; Alireza Jahandideh; Ahmad Asghari; Abolfazl Akbarzadeh; Saeed Hesaraki Journal: J Vet Res Date: 2018-12-10 Impact factor: 1.744
Authors: María Sancho-Tello; Francisco Forriol; José J Martín de Llano; Carmen Antolinos-Turpin; José A Gómez-Tejedor; José L Gómez Ribelles; Carmen Carda Journal: Int J Artif Organs Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 1.595