Linda S Elting1, Ying Xu2, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor2, Sharon H Giordano2. 1. Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd. Unit 1444, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. lelting@mdanderson.org. 2. Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd. Unit 1444, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The efficacy of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) among elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) receiving CHOP-based chemotherapy has been demonstrated in clinical trials, and G-CSFs are recommended in guidelines. We studied guideline adherence and the effectiveness of G-CSFs in the general population. METHODS: We used inpatient and outpatient claims from nationally representative databases linked to cancer information from tumor registries. Patients (N = 5884) diagnosed with NHL between 2001 and 2007 who were older than 65 years and who received CHOP-based chemotherapy were included. Adherence to guidelines was measured as the use of G-CSFs within 7 days of the first dose of chemotherapy. The measures of effectiveness were fever, infection, and death during cycle 1 of chemotherapy and time to cycle 2. Multiple-variable models of these outcomes were developed using logistic regression, controlling for demographic, clinical, and provider factors. RESULTS: G-CSF use increased from 32 % in 2001 to 72 % in 2007. Patients who received G-CSFs were significantly less likely to have outpatient encounters for infection than those who did not receive early G-CSFs (35 vs 47 %; p < 0.0001). Inpatient encounters for infection were similarly prevalent among patients who did or did not receive early G-CSFs (5 vs 4 %; p = 0.2). There was no association between G-CSF use and death during cycle 1. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to guidelines increased after publication of clinical trials and exceeded 70 % after publication of guidelines. G-CSFs were effective in preventing outpatient encounters for fever or infection, but not inpatient encounters or deaths during cycle 1.
PURPOSE: The efficacy of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) among elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) receiving CHOP-based chemotherapy has been demonstrated in clinical trials, and G-CSFs are recommended in guidelines. We studied guideline adherence and the effectiveness of G-CSFs in the general population. METHODS: We used inpatient and outpatient claims from nationally representative databases linked to cancer information from tumor registries. Patients (N = 5884) diagnosed with NHL between 2001 and 2007 who were older than 65 years and who received CHOP-based chemotherapy were included. Adherence to guidelines was measured as the use of G-CSFs within 7 days of the first dose of chemotherapy. The measures of effectiveness were fever, infection, and death during cycle 1 of chemotherapy and time to cycle 2. Multiple-variable models of these outcomes were developed using logistic regression, controlling for demographic, clinical, and provider factors. RESULTS:G-CSF use increased from 32 % in 2001 to 72 % in 2007. Patients who received G-CSFs were significantly less likely to have outpatient encounters for infection than those who did not receive early G-CSFs (35 vs 47 %; p < 0.0001). Inpatient encounters for infection were similarly prevalent among patients who did or did not receive early G-CSFs (5 vs 4 %; p = 0.2). There was no association between G-CSF use and death during cycle 1. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to guidelines increased after publication of clinical trials and exceeded 70 % after publication of guidelines. G-CSFs were effective in preventing outpatient encounters for fever or infection, but not inpatient encounters or deaths during cycle 1.
Authors: G B Donnelly; J Glassman; C Long; P Torres; D J Straus; J P O'Brien; J Bertino; C H Moskowitz; A D Zelenetz; C S Portlock Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2000-09
Authors: Thomas J Smith; James Khatcheressian; Gary H Lyman; Howard Ozer; James O Armitage; Lodovico Balducci; Charles L Bennett; Scott B Cantor; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; George Demetri; Christopher E Desch; Philip A Pizzo; Charles A Schiffer; Lee Schwartzberg; Mark R Somerfield; George Somlo; James C Wade; James L Wade; Rodger J Winn; Antoinette J Wozniak; Antonio C Wolff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R I Fisher; E R Gaynor; S Dahlberg; M M Oken; T M Grogan; E M Mize; J H Glick; C A Coltman; T P Miller Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1993-04-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: V A Morrison; V Picozzi; S Scott; B Pohlman; E Dickman; M Lee; G Lawless; R Kerr; V Caggiano; D Delgado; M Fridman; J Ford; W B Carter Journal: Clin Lymphoma Date: 2001-06
Authors: Eva Osby; Hans Hagberg; Stein Kvaløy; Lasse Teerenhovi; Harald Anderson; Eva Cavallin-Stahl; Harald Holte; John Myhre; Hannu Pertovaara; Magnus Björkholm Journal: Blood Date: 2003-01-16 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Gary H Lyman; David C Dale; Jonathan Friedberg; Jeffrey Crawford; Richard I Fisher Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L Repetto; L Biganzoli; C H Koehne; A S Luebbe; P Soubeyran; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; M S Aapro Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Thuy Koll; Mackenzi Pergolotti; Holly M Holmes; Huibrie C Pieters; G J van Londen; Zachary A Marcum; Amy R MacKenzie; Christopher B Steer Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 5.075