Literature DB >> 14556916

EORTC Cancer in the Elderly Task Force guidelines for the use of colony-stimulating factors in elderly patients with cancer.

L Repetto1, L Biganzoli, C H Koehne, A S Luebbe, P Soubeyran, V C G Tjan-Heijnen, M S Aapro.   

Abstract

Increasing age is not, in itself, a contraindication to cancer chemotherapy. Myelosuppression, however, a common adverse consequence of the administration of many standard-dose chemotherapy regimens to both young and elderly patients with cancer, increases with age. The risk of development of febrile neutropenia may contribute to a reluctance to administer chemotherapy in the elderly patient population. We conducted a detailed literature search (1992-2002) to derive evidence-based conclusions on the value of prophylactic colony-stimulating factor (CSF) administration in elderly patients receiving chemotherapy. Sufficient evidence allows us to affirm that prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the incidence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and infections in elderly patients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) or urothelial tumours. Lack of available trial data does not allow similar conclusions to be drawn for other cancers studied, but it is likely that similar benefits would accrue from the use of prophylactic G-CSF. There is insufficient evidence to extend this recommendation to include the use of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). There are insufficient data available to allow the evaluation of the impact of prophylactic CSF on the incidence of toxic deaths in elderly patients with cancer and this is a crucial question for geriatric oncology practice. There is no evidence in elderly patients that the delivery of standard-dose chemotherapy on schedule improves efficacy measures. The data show that febrile neutropenic events are more likely to occur during the first and second cycles of chemotherapy, thus prophylactic measures should be considered early in the course of treatment. Furthermore, since systematic dose reduction can impact on outcome, primary prophylactic use of G-CSF for all elderly patients receiving curative myelotoxic chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP) or CHOP-like) is indicated and we suggest a risk-adapted strategy with primary prophylactic G-CSF administration in high-risk patients. Dose intensification, through dose interval reduction, facilitated by prophylactic G-CSF, improved survival in elderly patients with some specific diseases. There is a need for further well-designed studies to identify the elderly patients who will benefit most from prophylactic G-CSF. To achieve this, we strongly urge the design of and participation in further trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14556916     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(03)00662-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  33 in total

1.  Senior adult oncology.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Ilene S Browner; Harvey Jay Cohen; Crystal S Denlinger; Mollie deShazo; Martine Extermann; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Jimmie C Holland; Holly M Holmes; Mohana B Karlekar; Nancy L Keating; June McKoy; Bruno C Medeiros; Ewa Mrozek; Tracey O'Connor; Stephen H Petersdorf; Hope S Rugo; Rebecca A Silliman; William P Tew; Louise C Walter; Alva B Weir; Tanya Wildes
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Managing neutropenia in older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy in a community setting.

Authors:  Irene Q Flores; William Ershler
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.027

Review 3.  Older adults and cancer treatment.

Authors:  Barbara Given; Charles W Given
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: where are we now?

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Jeffrey Crawford; Didier Kamioner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Analysis of cytopenia in geriatric inpatients.

Authors:  G Röhrig; I Becker; K Pappas; M C Polidori; R J Schulz
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 1.281

6.  Change in cycle 1 to cycle 2 haematological counts predicts toxicity in older patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Kelly Brogan; Katherine S Panageas; Ann Jakubowski; Marjorie Zauderer; Carol Pearce; Larry Norton; Jane Howard; Clifford Hudis
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Multivariate analysis of febrile neutropenia occurrence in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: data from the INC-EU Prospective Observational European Neutropenia Study.

Authors:  Ruth Pettengell; André Bosly; Thomas D Szucs; Christian Jackisch; Robert Leonard; Robert Paridaens; Manuel Constenla; Matthias Schwenkglenks
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 6.998

8.  Neutropenia occurrence and predictors of reduced chemotherapy delivery: results from the INC-EU prospective observational European neutropenia study.

Authors:  Ruth Pettengell; Matthias Schwenkglenks; Robert Leonard; André Bosly; Robert Paridaens; Manuel Constenla; Thomas D Szucs; Christian Jackisch
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Advanced-stage follicular lymphoma in the rituximab era: when should patients receive anthracycline-based chemotherapy?

Authors:  Ruth Pettengell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Clinical uses of GM-CSF, a critical appraisal and update.

Authors:  Martha Arellano; Sagar Lonial
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2008-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.