Literature DB >> 26797232

The Cost of Increasing Physical Activity and Maintaining Weight for Midlife Sedentary African American Women.

Tricia J Johnson1, Michael E Schoeny2, Louis Fogg2, JoEllen Wilbur2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the marginal costs of increasing physical activity and maintaining weight for a lifestyle physical activity program targeting sedentary African American women.
METHODS: Outcomes included change in minutes of total moderate to vigorous physical activity, leisure-time moderate to vigorous physical activity and walking per week, and weight stability between baseline and maintenance at 48 weeks. Marginal cost-effectiveness ratios (MCERs) were calculated for each outcome, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using a bootstrap method. The analysis was carried out from the societal perspective and calculated in 2013 US dollars.
RESULTS: For the 260 participants in the analysis, program costs were $165 ± $19, and participant costs were $164 ± $35, for a total cost of $329 ± $49. The MCER for change in walking was $1.50/min/wk (95% CI 1.28-1.87), for change in moderate to vigorous physical activity was $1.73/min/wk (95% CI 1.41-2.18), and for leisure-time moderate to vigorous physical activity was $1.94/min/wk (95% CI 1.58-2.40). The MCER for steps based on the accelerometer was $0.46 per step (95% CI 0.30-0.85) and weight stability was $412 (95% CI 399-456).
CONCLUSIONS: The Women's Lifestyle Physical Activity Program is a relatively low-cost strategy for increasing physical activity. The marginal cost of increasing physical activity is lower than for weight stability. The participant costs related to time in the program were nearly half the total costs, suggesting that practitioners and policymakers should consider the participant cost when disseminating a lifestyle physical activity program into practice.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African American women; economic evaluation; marginal cost-effectiveness; physical activity; weight stability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26797232      PMCID: PMC4724643          DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  37 in total

1.  The anatomy of stages of change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

2.  Cost-effectiveness of alternative approaches for motivating activity in sedentary adults: results of Project STRIDE.

Authors:  Mary Ann Sevick; Melissa A Napolitano; George D Papandonatos; Adam J Gordon; Lorraine M Reiser; Bess H Marcus
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Changes in diet and lifestyle and long-term weight gain in women and men.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian; Tao Hao; Eric B Rimm; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Cost-effectiveness of exercise on prescription with telephone support among women in general practice over 2 years.

Authors:  C Raina Elley; Sue Garrett; Sally B Rose; Des O'Dea; Beverley A Lawton; Simon A Moyes; Anthony C Dowell
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Effect of aerobic exercise on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

Authors:  Seamus P Whelton; Ashley Chin; Xue Xin; Jiang He
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Surveillance of health status in minority communities - Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health Across the U.S. (REACH U.S.) Risk Factor Survey, United States, 2009.

Authors:  Youlian Liao; David Bang; Shannon Cosgrove; Rick Dulin; Zachery Harris; April Taylor; Shannon White; Graydon Yatabe; Leandris Liburd; Wayne Giles
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2011-05-20

7.  Cost-effectiveness of lifestyle and structured exercise interventions in sedentary adults: results of project ACTIVE.

Authors:  M A Sevick; A L Dunn; M S Morrow; B H Marcus; G J Chen; S N Blair
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Effectiveness, efficiency, duration, and costs of recruiting for an African American women's lifestyle physical activity program.

Authors:  Joellen Wilbur; Susan W Buchholz; Diana M Ingram; Lynne T Braun; Tricia J Johnson; Louis Fogg; Arlene M Miller; Annabelle S Volgman; Judith McDevitt
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 9.  Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dena M Bravata; Crystal Smith-Spangler; Vandana Sundaram; Allison L Gienger; Nancy Lin; Robyn Lewis; Christopher D Stave; Ingram Olkin; John R Sirard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a Web-based or print-delivered tailored intervention to promote physical activity among adults aged over fifty: an economic evaluation of the Active Plus intervention.

Authors:  Rianne Hj Golsteijn; Denise A Peels; Silvia Maa Evers; Catherine Bolman; Aart N Mudde; Hein de Vries; Lilian Lechner
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  2 in total

1.  A study protocol for MindMoves: A lifestyle physical activity and cognitive training intervention to prevent cognitive impairment in older women with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Shannon Halloway; Michael E Schoeny; Lisa L Barnes; Zoe Arvanitakis; Susan J Pressler; Lynne T Braun; Annabelle Santos Volgman; Charlene Gamboa; JoEllen Wilbur
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Cost-effectiveness of telephone coaching for physically inactive ambulatory care hospital patients: economic evaluation alongside the Healthy4U randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephen Barrett; Stephen Begg; Paul O'Halloran; Michael Kingsley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.