A Tekes1, E M Jackson2, J Ogborn3, S Liang4, M Bledsoe4, D J Durand5, G Jallo2, T A G M Huisman5. 1. From the Division of Pediatric Radiology and Pediatric Neuroradiology (A.T., D.J.D., T.A.G.M.H.) atekes1@jhmi.edu. 2. Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery (E.M.J., G.J.). 3. Department of Pediatrics (J.O.), The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Radiology (S.L., M.B.), Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science. 5. From the Division of Pediatric Radiology and Pediatric Neuroradiology (A.T., D.J.D., T.A.G.M.H.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lean Six Sigma methodology is increasingly used to drive improvement in patient safety, quality of care, and cost-effectiveness throughout the US health care delivery system. To demonstrate our value as specialists, radiologists can combine lean methodologies along with imaging expertise to optimize imaging elements-of-care pathways. In this article, we describe a Lean Six Sigma project with the goal of reducing the relative use of pediatric head CTs in our population of patients with hydrocephalus by 50% within 6 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We applied a Lean Six Sigma methodology using a multidisciplinary team at a quaternary care academic children's center. The existing baseline imaging practice for hydrocephalus was outlined in a Kaizen session, and potential interventions were discussed. An improved radiation-free workflow with ultrafast MR imaging was created. Baseline data were collected for 3 months by using the departmental radiology information system. Data collection continued postintervention and during the control phase (each for 3 months). The percentage of neuroimaging per technique (head CT, head ultrasound, ultrafast brain MR imaging, and routine brain MR imaging) was recorded during each phase. RESULTS: The improved workflow resulted in a 75% relative reduction in the percentage of hydrocephalus imaging performed by CT between the pre- and postintervention/control phases (Z-test, P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our lean interventions in the pediatric hydrocephalus care pathway resulted in a significant reduction in head CT orders and increased use of ultrafast brain MR imaging.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lean Six Sigma methodology is increasingly used to drive improvement in patient safety, quality of care, and cost-effectiveness throughout the US health care delivery system. To demonstrate our value as specialists, radiologists can combine lean methodologies along with imaging expertise to optimize imaging elements-of-care pathways. In this article, we describe a Lean Six Sigma project with the goal of reducing the relative use of pediatric head CTs in our population of patients with hydrocephalus by 50% within 6 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We applied a Lean Six Sigma methodology using a multidisciplinary team at a quaternary care academic children's center. The existing baseline imaging practice for hydrocephalus was outlined in a Kaizen session, and potential interventions were discussed. An improved radiation-free workflow with ultrafast MR imaging was created. Baseline data were collected for 3 months by using the departmental radiology information system. Data collection continued postintervention and during the control phase (each for 3 months). The percentage of neuroimaging per technique (head CT, head ultrasound, ultrafast brain MR imaging, and routine brain MR imaging) was recorded during each phase. RESULTS: The improved workflow resulted in a 75% relative reduction in the percentage of hydrocephalus imaging performed by CT between the pre- and postintervention/control phases (Z-test, P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our lean interventions in the pediatric hydrocephalus care pathway resulted in a significant reduction in head CT orders and increased use of ultrafast brain MR imaging.
Authors: Esther L Yue; Garth D Meckler; Ross J Fleischman; Nathan R Selden; Dianna M E Bardo; Amity K Chu O'Connor; Eugene T Vu; Rongwei Fu; David M Spiro Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Jonathan Pindrik; Thierry A G M Huisman; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Aylin Tekes; Edward S Ahn Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2013-09-20 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Bruce E Lehnert; Habib Rahbar; Annemarie Relyea-Chew; David H Lewis; Michael L Richardson; James R Fink Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2011-04-27
Authors: Tamara D Simon; Jay Riva-Cambrin; Raj Srivastava; Susan L Bratton; J Michael Dean; John R W Kestle Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: B D Niederhauser; R J McDonald; L J Eckel; G F Keating; E M Broomall; N M Wetjen; F E Diehn; K M Schwartz; C H Hunt; K M Welker; D F Kallmes Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Brent R O'Neill; Sumit Pruthi; Harmanjeet Bains; Ryan Robison; Keiko Weir; Jeff Ojemann; Richard Ellenbogen; Anthony Avellino; Samuel R Browd Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2012-10-27 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Mark S Pearce; Jane A Salotti; Mark P Little; Kieran McHugh; Choonsik Lee; Kwang Pyo Kim; Nicola L Howe; Cecile M Ronckers; Preetha Rajaraman; Alan W Sir Craft; Louise Parker; Amy Berrington de González Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Corina Noje; Eric M Jackson; Isam W Nasr; Philomena M Costabile; Marcelo Cerullo; Katherine Hoops; Lindsey Rasmussen; Eric Henderson; Susan Ziegfeld; Lisa Puett; Courtney L Robertson Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Rachel Flynn; Amanda S Newton; Thomas Rotter; Dawn Hartfield; Sarah Walton; Michelle Fiander; Shannon D Scott Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2018-09-11