Literature DB >> 26796990

JOURNAL CLUB: Quantification of Fetal Dose Reduction if Abdominal CT Is Limited to the Top of the Iliac Crests in Pregnant Patients With Trauma.

Michael T Corwin1, J Anthony Seibert1, Ghaneh Fananapazir1, Ramit Lamba1, John M Boone1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to correlate fetal z-axis location within the maternal abdomen on CT with gestational age and estimate fetal dose reduction of a study limited to the abdomen only, with its lower aspect at the top of the iliac crests, compared with full abdominopelvic CT in pregnant trauma patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a study of pregnant patients who underwent CT of the abdomen and pelvis for trauma at a single institution over a 10-year period. The inferior aspect of maternal liver, spleen, gallbladder, pancreas, adrenals, and kidneys was recorded as above or below the iliac crests. The distance from the iliac crest to the top of the fetus or gestational sac was determined. The CT images of the limited and full scanning studies were independently reviewed by two blinded radiologists to identify traumatic injuries. Fetal dose profiles, including both scatter and primary radiation, were computed analytically along the central axis of the patient to estimate fetal dose reduction. Linear regression analysis was performed between gestational age and distance of the fetus to the iliac crests.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included (mean age, 26.2 years). Gestational age ranged from 5 to 38 weeks, with 5, 19, and 11 gestations in the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. All solid organs were above the iliac crests in all patients. In three of six patients, traumatic findings in the pelvis would have been missed with the limited study. There was high correlation between gestational age and distance of the fetus to the iliac crests (R(2) = 0.84). The mean gestational age at which the top of the fetus was at the iliac crest was 17.3 weeks. Using the limited scanning study, fetuses at 5, 20, and 40 weeks of gestation would receive an estimated 4.3%, 26.2%, and 59.9% of the dose, respectively, compared with the dose for the full scanning study.
CONCLUSION: In pregnant patients in our series with a history of trauma, CT of the abdomen only was an effective technique to reduce fetal radiation exposure compared with full abdomen and pelvis CT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; fetal dose; pregnant; radiation dose; trauma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26796990      PMCID: PMC5015436          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.14770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  24 in total

1.  GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Victor Montori; Gunn Vist; Regina Kunz; Jan Brozek; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Ben Djulbegovic; David Atkins; Yngve Falck-Ytter; John W Williams; Joerg Meerpohl; Susan L Norris; Elie A Akl; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Imaging of trauma in a pregnant patient.

Authors:  Ajay Puri; Paryssa Khadem; Salman Ahmed; Parul Yadav; Khaldoon Al-Dulaimy
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 3.  GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Nancy Santesso; Mark Helfand; Gunn Vist; Regina Kunz; Jan Brozek; Susan Norris; Joerg Meerpohl; Ben Djulbegovic; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Piet N Post; Jason W Busse; Paul Glasziou; Robin Christensen; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Accuracy and radiation dose reduction of a limited abdominopelvic CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Michael T Corwin; Melanie Chang; Ghaneh Fananapazir; Anthony Seibert; Ramit Lamba
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-06

5.  Imaging in pregnant patients: examination appropriateness.

Authors:  Karen M Wieseler; Puneet Bhargava; Kalpana M Kanal; Sandeep Vaidya; Brent K Stewart; Manjiri K Dighe
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Do all patients with left costal margin injuries require radiographic evaluation for intraabdominal injury?

Authors:  James F Holmes; Hien Ngyuen; Robert C Jacoby; John P McGahan; Hormozd Bozorgchami; David H Wisner
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Trauma in pregnancy.

Authors:  Y Baerga-Varela; S P Zietlow; M P Bannon; W S Harmsen; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Utilization of imaging in pregnant patients: 10-year review of 5270 examinations in 3285 patients--1997-2006.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lazarus; Carolynn Debenedectis; David North; Patricia K Spencer; William W Mayo-Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Clinical prediction rules for identifying adults at very low risk for intra-abdominal injuries after blunt trauma.

Authors:  James F Holmes; David H Wisner; John P McGahan; William R Mower; Nathan Kuppermann
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 5.721

10.  Radiation dose to the fetus from body MDCT during early gestation.

Authors:  Lynne M Hurwitz; Terry Yoshizumi; Robert E Reiman; Philip C Goodman; Erik K Paulson; Donald P Frush; Greta Toncheva; Giao Nguyen; Lottie Barnes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.