Literature DB >> 26795675

Engaging hospitalized patients in clinical care: Study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Ruth Masterson Creber1, Jennifer Prey2, Beatriz Ryan3, Irma Alarcon2, Min Qian4, Suzanne Bakken1, Steven Feiner5, George Hripcsak2, Fernanda Polubriaginof2, Susan Restaino6, Rebecca Schnall1, Philip Strong7, David Vawdrey3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients who are better informed and more engaged in their health care have higher satisfaction with health care and better health outcomes. While patient engagement has been a focus in the outpatient setting, strategies to engage inpatients in their care have not been well studied. We are undertaking a study to assess how patients' information needs during hospitalization can be addressed with health information technologies. To achieve this aim, we developed a personalized inpatient portal that allows patients to see who is on their care team, monitor their vital signs, review medications being administered, review current and historical lab and test results, confirm allergies, document pain scores and send questions and comments to inpatient care providers. The purpose of this paper is to describe the protocol for the study. METHODS/
DESIGN: This pragmatic randomized controlled trial will enroll 426 inpatient cardiology patients at an urban academic medical center into one of three arms receiving: 1) usual care, 2) iPad with general internet access, or 3) iPad with access to the personalized inpatient portal. The primary outcome of this trial is patient engagement, which is measured through the Patient Activation Measure. To assess scalability and potential reach of the intervention, we are partnering with a West Coast community hospital to deploy the patient engagement technology in their environment with an additional 160 participants.
CONCLUSION: This study employs a pragmatic randomized control trial design to test whether a personalized inpatient portal will improve patient engagement. If the study is successful, continuing advances in mobile computing technology should make these types of interventions available in a variety of clinical care delivery settings.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inpatient portal; Medical informatics; Patient activation; Patient engagement; Patient-centered care; Pragmatic clinical trial; Randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26795675      PMCID: PMC4818160          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  60 in total

1.  Patient education through record sharing.

Authors:  D L Bronson; A S Rubin; H M Tufo
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1978-12

2.  Patient access to electronic health records during hospitalization.

Authors:  Jonathan Michael Pell; Mary Mancuso; Shelly Limon; Kathy Oman; Chen-Tan Lin
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Psychometric properties of the patient activation measure among multimorbid older adults.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Ariel Frank Green; Daniel Scharfstein; Chad Boult; Lisa Reider; Stephen T Wegener
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  What are pragmatic trials?

Authors:  M Roland; D J Torgerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-24

5.  Validation of the patient activation measure in a multiple sclerosis clinic sample and implications for care.

Authors:  Lara Stepleman; Marie-Christine Rutter; Judith Hibbard; Lisa Johns; Dustin Wright; Mary Hughes
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.033

6.  The relationship between meeting patients' information needs and their satisfaction with hospital care and general health status outcomes.

Authors:  C O Larson; E C Nelson; D Gustafson; P B Batalden
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.038

7.  Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians' participatory decision-making style. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  S H Kaplan; B Gandek; S Greenfield; W Rogers; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Impact of an EMR-Based Daily Patient Update Letter on Communication and Parent Engagement in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Jonathan P Palma; Heather Keller; Margie Godin; Karen Wayman; Ronald S Cohen; William D Rhine; Christopher A Longhurst
Journal:  J Particip Med       Date:  2012-12-31

9.  Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  T F Hack; L F Degner; D G Dyck
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Awareness of the Care Team in Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  David K Vawdrey; Lauren G Wilcox; Sarah Collins; Steven Feiner; Olena Mamykina; Daniel M Stein; Suzanne Bakken; Matthew R Fred; Peter D Stetson
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.342

View more
  19 in total

1.  Understanding Secure Messaging in the Inpatient Environment: A New Avenue for Communication and Patient Engagement.

Authors:  Cynthia J Sieck; Daniel M Walker; Jennifer L Hefner; Jaclyn Volney; Timothy R Huerta; Ann Scheck McAlearney
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Use of a Patient Portal During Hospital Admissions to Surgical Services.

Authors:  Jamie R Robinson; Sharon E Davis; Robert M Cronin; Gretchen P Jackson
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

3.  Sharing Clinical Notes with Hospitalized Patients via an Acute Care Portal.

Authors:  Lisa V Grossman; Ruth Masterson Creber; Susan Restaino; David K Vawdrey
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

4.  Engaging hospitalized patients with personalized health information: a randomized trial of an inpatient portal.

Authors:  Ruth M Masterson Creber; Lisa V Grossman; Beatriz Ryan; Min Qian; Fernanda C G Polubriaginof; Susan Restaino; Suzanne Bakken; George Hripcsak; David K Vawdrey
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Leveraging Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Data Visualization.

Authors:  Lisa V Grossman; Steven K Feiner; Elliot G Mitchell; Ruth M Masterson Creber
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Providers' Perspectives on Sharing Health Information through Acute Care Patient Portals.

Authors:  Lisa V Grossman; Ruth M Masterson Creber; Beatriz Ryan; Susan Restaino; Irma Alarcon; Fernanda Polubriaginof; Suzanne Bakken; David K Vawdrey
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

7.  Technology Access, Technical Assistance, and Disparities in Inpatient Portal Use.

Authors:  Lisa V Grossman; Ruth M Masterson Creber; Jessica S Ancker; Beatriz Ryan; Fernanda Polubriaginof; Min Qian; Irma Alarcon; Susan Restaino; Suzanne Bakken; George Hripcsak; David K Vawdrey
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  Visual analogies, not graphs, increase patients' comprehension of changes in their health status.

Authors:  Meghan Reading Turchioe; Lisa V Grossman; Annie C Myers; Dawon Baik; Parag Goyal; Ruth M Masterson Creber
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Inpatients Sign On: An Opportunity to Engage Hospitalized Patients and Caregivers Using Inpatient Portals.

Authors:  Michelle M Kelly; Peter L T Hoonakker; Ryan J Coller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Reliability and validity of the patient activation measure in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Jennifer E Prey; Min Qian; Susan Restaino; Judith Hibbard; Suzanne Bakken; Rebecca Schnall; Gloria Rothenberg; David K Vawdrey; Ruth Masterson Creber
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.