Yuzo Yamasaki1, Michinobu Nagao2, Takeshi Kamitani3, Torahiko Yamanouchi3, Satoshi Kawanami2, Kenichiro Yamamura4, Ichiro Sakamoto5, Hidetake Yabuuchi6, Hiroshi Honda3. 1. Departments of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. yyama@radiol.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp. 2. Molecular Imaging & Diagnosis, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan. 3. Departments of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. 4. Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan. 5. Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan. 6. Health SciencesGraduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the utility of eccentricity index (EI) using cardiac cine MRI for the assessment of right ventricular (RV) hemodynamics in congenital heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Fifty-five patients with CHD (32 women; mean age, 40.7 ± 20.9 years) underwent both cardiac MRI and right heart catheterization. EI was defined as the ratio of the distance between the anterior-posterior wall and the septal-lateral wall measured in the short-axis of mid-ventricular cine MRI. Correlations between EIs and RV hemodynamic parameters were analyzed. EIs were compared between patients with and without late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). RESULTS: A strong correlation between mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and systolic EI (r = 0.81, p < 0.0001) and a moderate negative correlation between diastolic EI and RV ejection fraction (EF) (r = -0.62, p < 0.0001) were observed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed optimal EI thresholds for detecting patients with mean PAP ≥40 mmHg with C-statistics of 0.90 and patients with RVEF <40 % with C-statistics of 0.78. Systolic EIs were significantly greater for patients with LGE (1.45 ± 0.05) than for those without LGE (1.15 ± 0.07; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: EI offers a simple, comprehensive index that can predict pulmonary hypertension and RV dysfunction in CHD. KEY POINTS: • EI offers a simple and comprehensive index of RV hemodynamics. • EI could predict pulmonary hypertension and RV dysfunction. • Left ventricular deformation expressed as high EI is related to myocardial fibrosis.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the utility of eccentricity index (EI) using cardiac cine MRI for the assessment of right ventricular (RV) hemodynamics in congenital heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Fifty-five patients with CHD (32 women; mean age, 40.7 ± 20.9 years) underwent both cardiac MRI and right heart catheterization. EI was defined as the ratio of the distance between the anterior-posterior wall and the septal-lateral wall measured in the short-axis of mid-ventricular cine MRI. Correlations between EIs and RV hemodynamic parameters were analyzed. EIs were compared between patients with and without late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). RESULTS: A strong correlation between mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and systolic EI (r = 0.81, p < 0.0001) and a moderate negative correlation between diastolic EI and RV ejection fraction (EF) (r = -0.62, p < 0.0001) were observed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed optimal EI thresholds for detecting patients with mean PAP ≥40 mmHg with C-statistics of 0.90 and patients with RVEF <40 % with C-statistics of 0.78. Systolic EIs were significantly greater for patients with LGE (1.45 ± 0.05) than for those without LGE (1.15 ± 0.07; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: EI offers a simple, comprehensive index that can predict pulmonary hypertension and RV dysfunction in CHD. KEY POINTS: • EI offers a simple and comprehensive index of RV hemodynamics. • EI could predict pulmonary hypertension and RV dysfunction. • Left ventricular deformation expressed as high EI is related to myocardial fibrosis.
Authors: Ronald J Raymond; Alan L Hinderliter; Park W Willis; David Ralph; Edgar J Caldwell; William Williams; Neil A Ettinger; Nicholas S Hill; Warren R Summer; Bennett de Boisblanc; Todd Schwartz; Gary Koch; Linda M Clayton; Maria M Jöbsis; James W Crow; Walker Long Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-04-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Peter M Engelfriet; Marielle G J Duffels; Thomas Möller; Eric Boersma; Jan G P Tijssen; Erik Thaulow; Michael A Gatzoulis; Barbara J M Mulder Journal: Heart Date: 2006-12-12 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Francois Haddad; Julien Guihaire; Mehdi Skhiri; Andre Y Denault; Olaf Mercier; Shadi Al-Halabi; Bojan Vrtovec; Elie Fadel; Roham T Zamanian; Ingela Schnittger Journal: Echocardiography Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 1.724
Authors: Christian Schoenfeld; Jan B Hinrichs; Karen M Olsson; Martin-Alexander Kuettner; Julius Renne; Till Kaireit; Christoph Czerner; Frank Wacker; Marius M Hoeper; Bernhard C Meyer; Jens Vogel-Claussen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 5.315