Literature DB >> 26794665

Readability of discharge summaries: with what level of information are we dismissing our patients?

Asad J Choudhry1, Yaser M K Baghdadi1, Amy E Wagie2, Elizabeth B Habermann2, Stephanie F Heller1, Donald H Jenkins1, Daniel C Cullinane3, Martin D Zielinski4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed the health literacy of trauma discharge summaries and hypothesize that they are written at higher-than-recommended grade levels.
METHODS: The Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FKGL) and Flesch reading ease scores (FRES), 2 universally accepted scales for evaluating readability of medical information, were used.
RESULTS: A total of 497 patients were included. The mean patient age was 56 ± 22 years. Average FKGL and FRES were 10 ± 1 and 44 ± 7, including 132 summaries classified as very or fairly difficult to read. A total of 204 (65%) patients had functional reading skills at grade levels below the FKGL of their dismissal note; only 74 patients (24%) had the reading skills to adequately comprehend their dismissal summary. Total 30-day readmissions were 40, 65% of whom were patients with inadequate literacy for dismissal summary comprehension.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient discharge notes are written at too advanced of an educational level. To ensure patient comprehension, dismissal notes should be rewritten to a 6th-grade level.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Educational disparities; Flesch–Kincaid grade level; Health literacy; Readability; Trauma readmissions

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26794665      PMCID: PMC5245984          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  6 in total

Review 1.  Health literacy: an important issue for communicating health information to patients.

Authors:  B D Weiss
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei)       Date:  2001-11

Review 2.  Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Sameer Badarudeen; Sanjeev Sabharwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Text-to-speech technology effects on reading rate and comprehension by adults with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Judy Harvey; Karen Hux; Nikki Scott; Jeffry Snell
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 4.  Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy D Berkman; Stacey L Sheridan; Katrina E Donahue; David J Halpern; Karen Crotty
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Understanding the health literacy of America: results of the National Assessment of Adult Literacy.

Authors:  Carolyn Crane Cutilli; Ian M Bennett
Journal:  Orthop Nurs       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.913

Review 6.  The costs of limited health literacy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Klaus Eichler; Simon Wieser; Urs Brügger
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.380

  6 in total
  9 in total

1.  Targeted areas for improving health literacy after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Megan Moore; Taniga Kiatchai; Rajiv C Ayyagari; Monica S Vavilala
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Readability of Orthopaedic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Is There a Fundamental Failure to Communicate?

Authors:  Jorge L Perez; Zachary A Mosher; Shawna L Watson; Evan D Sheppard; Eugene W Brabston; Gerald McGwin; Brent A Ponce
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  What Happened to Me while I Was in the Hospital? Challenges and Opportunities for Generating Patient-Friendly Hospitalization Summaries.

Authors:  Sabita Acharya; Andrew D Boyd; Richard Cameron; Karen Dunn Lopez; Pamela Martyn-Nemeth; Carolyn Dickens; Amer Ardati; Jose D Flores; Matt Baumann; Betty Welland; Barbara Di Eugenio
Journal:  J Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2018-10-12

4.  Impact of Patient Access to Online VA Notes on Healthcare Utilization and Clinician Documentation: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Amanda C Blok; Daniel J Amante; Timothy P Hogan; Rajani S Sadasivam; Stephanie L Shimada; Susan Woods; Kim M Nazi; Thomas K Houston
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Structure, content, unsafe abbreviations, and completeness of discharge summaries: A retrospective analysis in a University Hospital in Austria.

Authors:  Christine Maria Schwarz; Magdalena Hoffmann; Christian Smolle; Michael Eiber; Bianca Stoiser; Gudrun Pregartner; Lars-Peter Kamolz; Gerald Sendlhofer
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.336

6.  Attitudes of physicians towards target groups and content of the discharge summary: a cross-sectional analysis in Styria, Austria.

Authors:  Magdalena Hoffmann; Christine Maria Schwarz; Gudrun Pregartner; Maximilian Weinrauch; Lydia Jantscher; Lars Kamolz; Gernot Brunner; Gerald Sendlhofer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Improving best practise for patients receiving hospital discharge letters: a realist review protocol.

Authors:  Katharine Weetman; Geoffrey Wong; Emma Scott; Stephanie Schnurr; Jeremy Dale
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Quality analysis of discharge instruction among 602 hospitalized patients in China: a multicenter, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Miao-Miao Yang; Wei Liang; Hui Hua Zhao; Ying Zhang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Planning for the Discharge, not for Patient Self-Management at Home - An Observational and Interview Study of Hospital Discharge.

Authors:  Maria Flink; Mirjam Ekstedt
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.120

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.