| Literature DB >> 26793743 |
Chun-Ho Yun1, Chris T Longenecker2, Hui-Ru Chang3, Greta S P Mok4, Jing-Yi Sun5, Chuan-Chuan Liu6, Jen-Yuan Kuo7, Chung-Lieh Hung8, Tung-Hsin Wu5, Hung-I Yeh7, Fei-Shih Yang9, Jason Jeun-Shenn Lee5, Charles Jia-Yin Hou7, Ricardo C Cury10, Hiram G Bezerra2.
Abstract
In this data, we present the details of the cross-sectional study from Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan that examined the relationship between three-dimensional (3D) peri-aortic root fat (PARF) volumes, cardiometabolic risk profiles, carotid artery morphology and remodeling. Our sample is composed of a total 1492 adults who underwent an annual cardiovascular risk survey in Taiwan. PARF was measured using images of gated non-contrast cardiac computed tomography (CT) and a dedicated workstation (Aquarius 3D Workstation, TeraRecon, San Mateo, CA, USA). The stratified analyses were performed in order to assess the association between carotid morphology, remodeling and PARF by tertile. For further analyses and discussion, please see "The Association among Peri-Aortic Root Adipose Tissue, Metabolic derangements and Burden of Atherosclerosis in Asymptomatic Population" by Yun et al. (2015) [1].Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26793743 PMCID: PMC4689113 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2015.11.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1(a) Tracing of the pericardium (in red) at the level of left main coronary artery (LM) in the axial view. This is the caudal limit of peri-aortic root fat (PARF); (b) the pericardium is then traced (in red) in each of eight slices extending 24 mm (8×3 mm2 slices) cranially from the level of LM; (c) the cranial and caudal limits of PARF (arrow) are shown in the coronal view on the top of the pericardial fat and heart (arrow head); (d) three dimensional (3D) reconstruction of PARF, shown in relationship to the thoracic spine and ribs. The volume quantification of PARF of this case is 18.6 ml. (For interpretation of the reference to color in this figure legend, the reader is reffered to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 2Comparison of two study subjects—one with a larger volume of peri-aortic root fat (PARF). Red lines indicate the 24 mm caudal to cranial limits of PARF. The orange color indicates adipose tissue surrounding the aortic root in sagittal (a) and axial (b) views. High resolution carotid ultrasound in the study subject with a larger volume of PARF (33.1 ml) showed greater intima-media thickness (2.1 mm) and plaque existence (c). (For interpretation of the reference to color in this figure legend, the reader is reffered to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Comparison of two study subjects—one with a relatively small amount of PARF. Red lines indicate the 24 mm caudal to cranial limits of PARF. The orange color indicates adipose tissue surrounding the aortic root in sagittal (a) and axial (b) views. The relatively healthy subject with smaller PARF (7.99 ml) had thinner IMT and no carotid plaque (c). (For interpretation of the reference to color in this figure legend, the reader is reffered to the web version of this article.)
| Subject area | Radiology |
| More specific subject area | Multi-detector computer tomography |
| Type of data | Peri-aortic root fat volume |
| How data was acquired | Multi-detector computer tomography (MDCT) (Sensation 16, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany) and post processing workstation (Aquarius 3D Workstation, TeraRecon, San Mateo, CA, USA) |
| Data format | 3D volume reconstructions |
| Experimental factors | MDCT imaging was performed as described |
| Experimental features | Peri-aortic root fat was quantified using a post processing workstation (Aquarius 3D Workstation, TeraRecon, San Mateo, CA, USA) |
| Data source location | Taiwan |
| Data accessibility | Data are provided with this article |