Literature DB >> 26791967

Using a Cardiac Event Recorder in Children with Potentially Arrhythmia-Related Symptoms.

Murat Saygi1, Yakup Ergul1, Isa Ozyilmaz1, Fatma Sevinc Sengul1, Osman Guvenc1, Eyup Aslan1, Alper Guzeltas1, Celal Akdeniz1, Volkan Tuzcu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, we reported our experience with the use of cardiac event recorders in pediatric patients.
METHODS: We evaluated 583 patients fitted with an event recorder (15-30 days) between March 2010 and November 2014 at our clinic. Excluded from the study were 117 patients with no recorded events and six with records contaminated by electrocardiogram artifacts. All of the patients received electrocardiograms, Holter monitoring, and echocardiography before the cardiac event recording.
RESULTS: The patient sample consisted of 460 patients (64% female). The mean age was 12.8 ± 4.1 years. The median number of recorded events was 7. The indications included palpitations in 336 (73%) patients, syncope in 27 (6%) patients, and chest pain and palpitations in 97 (21%) patients. Whereas 64 patients (14%) had structural heart disease according to echocardiographic examination, the remaining patients had normal echocardiographic examination results. The most frequent cardiac comorbidities were mitral valve prolapse (6%), operated tetralogy of Fallot (1.5%), and complicated congenital heart diseases with single ventricle physiology (1%). The recorded events were sinus tachycardia in 113 (25%) patients, supraventricular tachycardia in 35 (8%) patients, ventricular extrasystole in 20 (4%) patients, supraventricular extrasystole in nine (2%) patients, and ventricular tachycardia in two (0.4%) patients. Based on the event recorder and follow-up electrocardiogram findings, 46 patients received an electrophysiology study/ablation. The symptom-rhythm correlation was 39%.
CONCLUSION: In the presence of possible arrhythmia-related symptoms in children, a cardiac event recorder can be considered a useful primary diagnostic method. More research on this topic is needed.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arrhythmia; cardiac event recorder; children; palpitation; syncope

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26791967      PMCID: PMC6931635          DOI: 10.1111/anec.12339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  17 in total

Review 1.  Ambulatory arrhythmia monitoring: choosing the right device.

Authors:  Peter Zimetbaum; Alena Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Use of the implantable loop recorder in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Matthias Gass; Christian Apitz; Schahriar Salehi-Gilani; Gerhard Ziemer; Michael Hofbeck
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.093

3.  Evaluation rhythm problems in unexplained syncope etiology with implantable loop recorder.

Authors:  Yakup Ergul; Ibrahim Cansaran Tanidir; Isa Ozyilmaz; Celal Akdeniz; Volkan Tuzcu
Journal:  Pediatr Int       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 1.524

4.  Analysis of 2017 Holter records in pediatric patients.

Authors:  C Ayabakan; S Ozer; A Celiker; S Ozme
Journal:  Turk J Pediatr       Date:  2000 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.552

5.  A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope.

Authors:  Soori Sivakumaran; Andrew D Krahn; George J Klein; Jane Finan; Raymond Yee; Suzanne Renner; Allan C Skanes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Are implantable loop recorders useful in detecting arrhythmias in children with unexplained syncope?

Authors:  Khalid N Al Dhahri; James E Potts; Christine C Chiu; Robert M Hamilton; Shubhayan Sanatani
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Limited clinical utility of Holter monitoring in patients with palpitations or altered consciousness: analysis of 8973 recordings in 7394 patients.

Authors:  Sreekumar Sulfi; Dauda Balami; Neha Sekhri; Abdel Suliman; Akhil Kapur; R Andrew Archbold; Kulasegaram Ranjadayalan; Adam D Timmis
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Transtelephonic electrocardiographic monitors for evaluation of children and adolescents with suspected arrhythmias.

Authors:  Elizabeth Vickers Saarel; Christopher B Stefanelli; Peter S Fischbach; Gerald A Serwer; Amnon Rosenthal; Macdonald Dick
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Using a Cardiac Event Recorder in Children with Potentially Arrhythmia-Related Symptoms.

Authors:  Murat Saygi; Yakup Ergul; Isa Ozyilmaz; Fatma Sevinc Sengul; Osman Guvenc; Eyup Aslan; Alper Guzeltas; Celal Akdeniz; Volkan Tuzcu
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 1.468

10.  The value of Holter monitoring in the assessment of Pediatric patients.

Authors:  Ranya A Hegazy; Wael N Lotfy
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2007-10-22
View more
  1 in total

1.  Using a Cardiac Event Recorder in Children with Potentially Arrhythmia-Related Symptoms.

Authors:  Murat Saygi; Yakup Ergul; Isa Ozyilmaz; Fatma Sevinc Sengul; Osman Guvenc; Eyup Aslan; Alper Guzeltas; Celal Akdeniz; Volkan Tuzcu
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 1.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.