Literature DB >> 26791209

Dopamine D3 Receptors Modulate the Ability of Win-Paired Cues to Increase Risky Choice in a Rat Gambling Task.

Michael M Barrus1, Catharine A Winstanley1.   

Abstract

Similar to other addiction disorders, the cues inherent in many gambling procedures are thought to play an important role in mediating their addictive nature. Animal models of gambling-related behavior, while capturing dimensions of economic decision making, have yet to address the impact that these salient cues may have in promoting maladaptive choice. Here, we determined whether adding win-associated audiovisual cues to a rat gambling task (rGT) would influence decision making. Thirty-two male Long-Evans rats were tested on either the cued or uncued rGT. In these tasks, animals chose between four options associated with different magnitudes and frequencies of reward and punishing time-out periods. As in the Iowa Gambling Task, favoring options associated with smaller per-trial rewards but smaller losses and avoiding the tempting "high-risk, high-reward" decks maximized profits. Although the reinforcement contingencies were identical in both task versions, rats' choice of the disadvantageous risky options was significantly greater on the cued task. Furthermore, a D3 receptor agonist increased choice of the disadvantageous options, whereas a D3 antagonist had the opposite effects, only on the cued task. These findings are consistent with the reported role of D3 receptors in mediating the facilitatory effects of cues in addiction. Collectively, these results indicate that the cued rGT is a valuable model with which to study the mechanism by which salient cues can invigorate maladaptive decision making, an important and understudied component of both gambling and substance use disorders. Significance statement: We used a rodent analog of the Iowa Gambling Task to determine whether the addition of audiovisual cues would affect choice preferences. Adding reward-concurrent cues significantly increased risky choice. This is the first clear demonstration that reward-paired cues can bias cost/benefit decision making against a subject's best interests in a manner concordant with elevated addiction susceptibility. Choice on the cued task was uniquely sensitive to modulation by D3 receptor ligands, yet these drugs did not alter decision making on the uncued task. The relatively unprecedented sensitivity of choice on the cued task to D3-receptor-mediated neurotransmission data suggest that similar neurobiological processes underlie the ability of cues to both bias animals toward risky options and facilitate drug addiction.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/360785-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D3; addiction; cues; decision making; dopamine; impulsivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26791209      PMCID: PMC6602008          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2225-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  29 in total

1.  Monoaminergic modulation of decision-making under risk of punishment in a rat model.

Authors:  Shelby L Blaes; Caitlin A Orsini; Marci R Mitchell; Megan S Spurrell; Sara M Betzhold; Kenneth Vera; Jennifer L Bizon; Barry Setlow
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Prior Exposure to Salient Win-Paired Cues in a Rat Gambling Task Increases Sensitivity to Cocaine Self-Administration and Suppresses Dopamine Efflux in Nucleus Accumbens: Support for the Reward Deficiency Hypothesis of Addiction.

Authors:  Jacqueline-Marie N Ferland; Tristan J Hynes; Celine D Hounjet; David Lindenbach; Cole Vonder Haar; Wendy K Adams; Anthony G Phillips; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Pharmacological evidence that 5-HT2C receptor blockade selectively improves decision making when rewards are paired with audiovisual cues in a rat gambling task.

Authors:  Wendy K Adams; Chris Barkus; Jacqueline-Marie N Ferland; Trevor Sharp; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Noradrenergic contributions to cue-driven risk-taking and impulsivity.

Authors:  Chloe S Chernoff; Tristan J Hynes; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Reinforcement learning models of risky choice and the promotion of risk-taking by losses disguised as wins in rats.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.478

6.  Understanding Addiction Using Animal Models.

Authors:  Brittany N Kuhn; Peter W Kalivas; Ana-Clara Bobadilla
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 7.  Sex differences in animal models of decision making.

Authors:  Caitlin A Orsini; Barry Setlow
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  The effects of buspirone on occupancy of dopamine receptors and the rat gambling task.

Authors:  Patricia Di Ciano; Patrick Mc Cormick; Cristiana Stefan; Ernest Wong; Aaron Kim; Gary Remington; Bernard Le Foll
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  Cued for risk: Evidence for an incentive sensitization framework to explain the interplay between stress and anxiety, substance abuse, and reward uncertainty in disordered gambling behavior.

Authors:  Samantha N Hellberg; Trinity I Russell; Mike J F Robinson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Increased motor impulsivity in a rat gambling task during chronic ropinirole treatment: potentiation by win-paired audiovisual cues.

Authors:  Melanie Tremblay; Michael M Barrus; Paul J Cocker; Christelle Baunez; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.