Literature DB >> 26791000

Induction of micronuclei and superoxide production in neuroblastoma and glioma cell lines exposed to weak 50 Hz magnetic fields.

Kavindra Kumar Kesari1, Jukka Juutilainen2, Jukka Luukkonen2, Jonne Naarala2.   

Abstract

Extremely low-frequency (ELF) magnetic fields (MF) have been associated with adverse health effects in epidemiological studies. However, there is no known mechanism for biological effects of weak environmental MFs. Previous studies indicate MF effects on DNA integrity and reactive oxygen species, but such evidence is limited to MFs higher (greater than or equal to 100 µT) than those generally found in the environment. Effects of 10 and 30 µT fields were studied in SH-SY5Y and C6 cells exposed to 50-Hz MFs for 24 h. Based on earlier findings, menadione (MQ) was used as a cofactor. Responses to MF were observed in both cell lines, but the effects differed between the cell lines. Micronuclei were significantly increased in SH-SY5Y cells at 30 µT. This effect was largest at the highest MQ dose used. Increased cytosolic and mitochondrial superoxide levels were observed in C6 cells. The effects on superoxide levels were independent of MQ, enabling further mechanistic studies without co-exposure to MQ. The micronucleus and mitochondrial superoxide data were consistent with a conventional rising exposure-response relationship. For cytosolic superoxide, the effect size was unexpectedly large at 10 µT. The results indicate that the threshold for biological effects of ELF MFs is 10 µT or less.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  exposure–response relationship; extremely low-frequency magnetic field; genotoxicity; reactive oxygen species

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26791000      PMCID: PMC4759805          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  32 in total

Review 1.  Non-ionizing radiation, Part 1: static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  2002

2.  Magnetically sensitive light-induced reactions in cryptochrome are consistent with its proposed role as a magnetoreceptor.

Authors:  Kiminori Maeda; Alexander J Robinson; Kevin B Henbest; Hannah J Hogben; Till Biskup; Margaret Ahmad; Erik Schleicher; Stefan Weber; Christiane R Timmel; P J Hore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Do extremely low frequency magnetic fields enhance the effects of environmental carcinogens? A meta-analysis of experimental studies.

Authors:  Jukka Juutilainen; Timo Kumlin; Jonne Naarala
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  Potential health impacts of residential exposures to extremely low frequency magnetic fields in Europe.

Authors:  James Grellier; Paolo Ravazzani; Elisabeth Cardis
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  Role of NADPH oxidase in endothelial ischemia/reperfusion injury in humans.

Authors:  Stavros P Loukogeorgakis; Merlijn J van den Berg; Reecha Sofat; Dorothea Nitsch; Marietta Charakida; Bu'Hussein Haiyee; Eric de Groot; Raymond J MacAllister; Taco W Kuijpers; John E Deanfield
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  The effects of weak magnetic fields on radical pairs.

Authors:  Frank S Barnes; Ben Greenebaum
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.010

7.  Menadione-induced DNA fragmentation without 8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine formation in isolated rat hepatocytes.

Authors:  A Fischer-Nielsen; G B Corcoran; H E Poulsen; L M Kamendulis; S Loft
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1995-05-17       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 8.  ELF magnetic fields: animal studies, mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Isabelle Lagroye; Yann Percherancier; Jukka Juutilainen; Florence Poulletier De Gannes; Bernard Veyret
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 9.  Signal transduction by reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Toren Finkel
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Reactive oxygen species: role in the development of cancer and various chronic conditions.

Authors:  Gulam Waris; Haseeb Ahsan
Journal:  J Carcinog       Date:  2006-05-11
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Magnetocarcinogenesis: is there a mechanism for carcinogenic effects of weak magnetic fields?

Authors:  Jukka Juutilainen; Mikko Herrala; Jukka Luukkonen; Jonne Naarala; P J Hore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  ER stress and genomic instability induced by gamma radiation in mice primary cultured glial cells.

Authors:  Jit Chatterjee; Rajesha K Nairy; Jaldeep Langhnoja; Ashutosh Tripathi; Rajashekhar K Patil; Prakash P Pillai; Mohammed S Mustak
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 3.584

3.  Direction-Dependent Effects of Combined Static and ELF Magnetic Fields on Cell Proliferation and Superoxide Radical Production.

Authors:  Jonne Naarala; Kavindra Kumar Kesari; Ian McClure; Cristina Chavarriaga; Jukka Juutilainen; Carlos F Martino
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields and Redox-Responsive Pathways Linked to Cancer Drug Resistance: Insights from Co-Exposure-Based In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Stefano Falone; Silvano Santini; Valeria Cordone; Giovanna Di Emidio; Carla Tatone; Marisa Cacchio; Fernanda Amicarelli
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-02-23

Review 5.  Cellular stress response to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF): An explanation for controversial effects of ELF-EMF on apoptosis.

Authors:  Mojdeh Barati; Behrad Darvishi; Mohammad Amin Javidi; Ali Mohammadian; Seyed Peyman Shariatpanahi; Mohammad Reza Eisavand; Alireza Madjid Ansari
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 6.  Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics.

Authors:  Massimo E Maffei
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Field exposure to 50 Hz significantly affects wild-type and unfolded p53 expression in NB69 neuroblastoma cells.

Authors:  María Antonia Martínez; Alejandro Úbeda; Javier Martínez-Botas; María Ángeles Trillo
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.111

8.  Cryptochrome: The magnetosensor with a sinister side?

Authors:  Lukas Landler; David A Keays
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 9.  30 Hz, Could It Be Part of a Window Frequency for Cellular Response?

Authors:  Olga García-Minguillán; Ceferino Maestú
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.